Impact of height-induced postural threat and arm movement strategies while performing a semi-static balance task: comparison of postural control and emotional state outcomes between children and young adultsRunning head: Postural threat and arm movem

Previous evidence suggests that children compared to young adults show a potentially ineffective postural adaptation strategy in response to a height-induced threat during quite standing. However, it is unknown whether this behavior is also evident in a more difficult (semi-static) balance task and how this is altered by the applied arm movement strategy. This work compared the effects of different arm movement strategies on subjective and objective indicators related to performing a semi-static balance task at or above ground-level in children versus young adults. Twenty-five children [mean (SD) age: 11.7 (0.5) years] and 23 young adults [mean (SD) age: 21.8 (3.4) years] performed a continuous contralateral leg swing whilst standing on one leg at both ground-level (no threat) and 80 cm above ground (threat). In both conditions, participants completed the task under free and restricted arm movements. Subjective indicators related to postural control—including balance confidence, fear of falling, perceived instability, and conscious balance processing—were assessed via self-report questionnaires. Objective measures related to the balance included sway amplitude and frequency. Children significantly differed from young adults in subjective and objective outcomes by showing more pronounced emotional responses (i.e., fear of falling, perceived instability, and conscious balance processing) and greater sway frequency (i.e., AP COP MPF) when standing at height, especially when arm movements were restricted. The findings complement previous research related to postural threat and arm restriction while using a more difficult semi-static balance task. Future studies should examine when the transition from a child to an adult-like pattern in balance control during height-induced postural threat occurs. • Effect of arm movement on height-induced postural threat while standing was tested. • Standing at height with restricted arms worsened balance in children and adults. • Children exhibited stronger emotional responses to height than young adults.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gait & Posture
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2026.110212
Primary Topic
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of height-induced postural threat and arm movement strategies while performing a semi-static balance task: comparison of postural control and emotional state outcomes between children and young adultsRunning head: Postural threat and arm movem

Thomas Muehlbauer, Johanna Lambrich, Mathew W. Hill, Anna M. Wissmann
Gait & Posture
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
article

Impact of height-induced postural threat and arm movement strategies while performing a semi-static balance task: comparison of postural control and emotional state outcomes between children and young adultsRunning head: Postural threat and arm movem

Thomas Muehlbauer, Johanna Lambrich, Mathew W. Hill, Anna M. Wissmann
article en

Abstract

Previous evidence suggests that children compared to young adults show a potentially ineffective postural adaptation strategy in response to a height-induced threat during quite standing. However, it is unknown whether this behavior is also evident in a more difficult (semi-static) balance task and how this is altered by the applied arm movement strategy. This work compared the effects of different arm movement strategies on subjective and objective indicators related to performing a semi-static balance task at or above ground-level in children versus young adults. Twenty-five children [mean (SD) age: 11.7 (0.5) years] and 23 young adults [mean (SD) age: 21.8 (3.4) years] performed a continuous contralateral leg swing whilst standing on one leg at both ground-level (no threat) and 80 cm above ground (threat). In both conditions, participants completed the task under free and restricted arm movements. Subjective indicators related to postural control—including balance confidence, fear of falling, perceived instability, and conscious balance processing—were assessed via self-report questionnaires. Objective measures related to the balance included sway amplitude and frequency. Children significantly differed from young adults in subjective and objective outcomes by showing more pronounced emotional responses (i.e., fear of falling, perceived instability, and conscious balance processing) and greater sway frequency (i.e., AP COP MPF) when standing at height, especially when arm movements were restricted. The findings complement previous research related to postural threat and arm restriction while using a more difficult semi-static balance task. Future studies should examine when the transition from a child to an adult-like pattern in balance control during height-induced postural threat occurs. • Effect of arm movement on height-induced postural threat while standing was tested. • Standing at height with restricted arms worsened balance in children and adults. • Children exhibited stronger emotional responses to height than young adults.

Gait & Posture
University of Leicester (GB), University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.