Understanding Civic Participation of Older Adults: A Scoping Review

• Concept of participation become increasingly prominent in the United Nations’ discussion of international aging policy since the 2000s. Older adults actively participated in civic activities were seen as building social capital. • Civic participation among older citizens is driven by multiple and shifting motivations yet hindered by personal and structural barriers. • Society must honour the diverse ways people age. The choice to participate, or not, must be acknowledged and respected. • Addressing barriers to civic participation requires a comprehensive approach that integrates health support, socioeconomic assistance, community development, cultural adaptation programs, and policy initiatives. • North American and European studies still dominate the literature on civic participation and older adults. More research is needed on civic participation and representation of older adults not only at national or regional levels, but also globally. Despite growing policy and research interest, definitions of civic participation remain inconsistent and evidence concerning older adults’ participation fragmented. The review questions included: (a) What is the current state of knowledge on older adults’ civic participation? (b) What factors influence their participation? A scoping review was conducted following Arksey and O’Malley’s framework and reported using PRISMA-ScR guidelines. The protocol was registered with the Open Science Framework. Thirty-one global electronic databases were searched in 2023 and updated in 2025. Data were analysed using descriptive and thematic synthesis. Most included studies were from North America, with the fewest from South America (N=174). Civic participation among older adults included volunteering, advocacy, political engagement, and informal helping, shaped by individual (health, motivation, education) and contextual (socioeconomic, cultural, institutional) factors. Facilitators included social networks, education, and supportive policies, while barriers involved poor health, ageism, limited access, and organizational rigidity. The literature revealed temporal shifts in how policy makers and researchers perceived civic participation, and with limited attention to subgroups such as the oldest-old and nursing home residents. A wide array of factors either facilitated or acted as barriers to civic engagement among older adults, reflecting their personal circumstances and socio-political contexts. Civic engagement can be maintained and strengthened through inclusive, meaningful strategies and policies. However, active participation should not be regarded as a measure of successful aging or a means to develop social capital. The decision of older adults to participate, or not, should be respected.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2026.106291
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding Civic Participation of Older Adults: A Scoping Review

A Ashcraft, CKY Lai, C Annichiarico, C Jones et al.
Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
Health disparities and outcomes
article

Understanding Civic Participation of Older Adults: A Scoping Review

A Ashcraft, CKY Lai, C Annichiarico, C Jones, JR Montayre, ML Harris
article en

Abstract

• Concept of participation become increasingly prominent in the United Nations’ discussion of international aging policy since the 2000s. Older adults actively participated in civic activities were seen as building social capital. • Civic participation among older citizens is driven by multiple and shifting motivations yet hindered by personal and structural barriers. • Society must honour the diverse ways people age. The choice to participate, or not, must be acknowledged and respected. • Addressing barriers to civic participation requires a comprehensive approach that integrates health support, socioeconomic assistance, community development, cultural adaptation programs, and policy initiatives. • North American and European studies still dominate the literature on civic participation and older adults. More research is needed on civic participation and representation of older adults not only at national or regional levels, but also globally. Despite growing policy and research interest, definitions of civic participation remain inconsistent and evidence concerning older adults’ participation fragmented. The review questions included: (a) What is the current state of knowledge on older adults’ civic participation? (b) What factors influence their participation? A scoping review was conducted following Arksey and O’Malley’s framework and reported using PRISMA-ScR guidelines. The protocol was registered with the Open Science Framework. Thirty-one global electronic databases were searched in 2023 and updated in 2025. Data were analysed using descriptive and thematic synthesis. Most included studies were from North America, with the fewest from South America (N=174). Civic participation among older adults included volunteering, advocacy, political engagement, and informal helping, shaped by individual (health, motivation, education) and contextual (socioeconomic, cultural, institutional) factors. Facilitators included social networks, education, and supportive policies, while barriers involved poor health, ageism, limited access, and organizational rigidity. The literature revealed temporal shifts in how policy makers and researchers perceived civic participation, and with limited attention to subgroups such as the oldest-old and nursing home residents. A wide array of factors either facilitated or acted as barriers to civic engagement among older adults, reflecting their personal circumstances and socio-political contexts. Civic engagement can be maintained and strengthened through inclusive, meaningful strategies and policies. However, active participation should not be regarded as a measure of successful aging or a means to develop social capital. The decision of older adults to participate, or not, should be respected.

Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
Bond University (AU), Texas Tech University (US), Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK), Shandong University (CN), University of Arkansas Medical Center (US), University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US), Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Health disparities and outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.