Developing a patient reported measure on out-of-pocket healthcare expenditure among Aboriginal patients: a formative study

Healthcare costs not subsidized by the government and are covered by patients, are known as out-of-pocket healthcare expenditure (OOPHE). In Australia, OOPHE disproportionately impacts Aboriginal households, particularly in rural and remote regions. Currently no patient reported measures (PRM) to assess OOPHE exist, despite being an identified priority in Aboriginal communities. This study developed and psychometrically evaluated (validity and test-retest reliability) of an OOPHE PRM for Aboriginal households in outer regional to remote areas. This Aboriginal led study was governed by an Aboriginal Governance Group, which involved a 4-stage process: (i) identification of community-derived OOPHE themes; (ii) item development and expert judgment quantification; (iii) exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to determine factor structure through pilot testing with Aboriginal participants; and (iv) assessment of reliability and stability through test-retest methods. Stage 1 identified OOPHE themes (i.e. barriers, financial strain), informing development of a 15 item PRM in Stage 2. In Stage 3, 39 Aboriginal participants completed Test 1, with EFA revealing a two-factor model; Factor 1 (8 items, internal consistency = 0.91) and Factor 2 (6 items, internal consistency = 0.85). In Stage 4, 32 participants completed Test 2, with over 60% of items showing substantial to perfect agreement (κ = 0.61-0.87) and scale-level reliability as good to excellent (ICC = 0.75-0.92). Two items performed poorly and were removed, resulting in a final 13-item PRM. The OOPHE PRM demonstrates promising psychometric properties as a culturally grounded measure of OOPHE burden among Aboriginal families, supporting advocacy for equitable policy, funding, and health system reform.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Promotion International
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daag058
Primary Topic
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing a patient reported measure on out-of-pocket healthcare expenditure among Aboriginal patients: a formative study

Jaquelyne T. Hughes, Nayia Cominos, Shane D’Angelo, Pip Henderson et al.
Health Promotion International
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
article

Developing a patient reported measure on out-of-pocket healthcare expenditure among Aboriginal patients: a formative study

Jaquelyne T. Hughes, Nayia Cominos, Shane D’Angelo, Pip Henderson, Billie Bonevski, Talia Johnson, Julieann Coombes, Candice Oster, Ray Mahoney, Courtney Ryder, Claire Drummond, Lavender Otieno, Shanti Omodei-James, Jonathan Karnon, Georga Sallows, Andrew Goodman, Patrick Sharpe, Jessie Sleep, Odette Pearson
article en

Abstract

Healthcare costs not subsidized by the government and are covered by patients, are known as out-of-pocket healthcare expenditure (OOPHE). In Australia, OOPHE disproportionately impacts Aboriginal households, particularly in rural and remote regions. Currently no patient reported measures (PRM) to assess OOPHE exist, despite being an identified priority in Aboriginal communities. This study developed and psychometrically evaluated (validity and test-retest reliability) of an OOPHE PRM for Aboriginal households in outer regional to remote areas. This Aboriginal led study was governed by an Aboriginal Governance Group, which involved a 4-stage process: (i) identification of community-derived OOPHE themes; (ii) item development and expert judgment quantification; (iii) exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to determine factor structure through pilot testing with Aboriginal participants; and (iv) assessment of reliability and stability through test-retest methods. Stage 1 identified OOPHE themes (i.e. barriers, financial strain), informing development of a 15 item PRM in Stage 2. In Stage 3, 39 Aboriginal participants completed Test 1, with EFA revealing a two-factor model; Factor 1 (8 items, internal consistency = 0.91) and Factor 2 (6 items, internal consistency = 0.85). In Stage 4, 32 participants completed Test 2, with over 60% of items showing substantial to perfect agreement (κ = 0.61-0.87) and scale-level reliability as good to excellent (ICC = 0.75-0.92). Two items performed poorly and were removed, resulting in a final 13-item PRM. The OOPHE PRM demonstrates promising psychometric properties as a culturally grounded measure of OOPHE burden among Aboriginal families, supporting advocacy for equitable policy, funding, and health system reform.

Health Promotion InternationalVol. 41(3)
Flinders University (AU), La Trobe University (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), Health Sciences and Nutrition (AU), The George Institute for Global Health (AU), South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (AU), Community Partners (US), The University of Adelaide (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.