ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1976 SIMULATION-ASSISTED TRAINING FOR ULTRASOUND-GUIDED PERIPHERAL IV ACCESS IN NURSES: A RANDOMIZED EDUCATIONAL STUDY

Abstract Background and aims Ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter (PIV) placement is increasingly performed by nurses and requires the acquisition of complex visuomotor and cognitive skills. Advanced simulation technologies have been developed to facilitate learning, yet their educational benefit when integrated into existing training curricula remains uncertain. Methods We conducted a single-center, randomized educational study comparing standard training with simulation-assisted training for ultrasound-guided PIV placement among nurses. Twenty nurses were randomized to a control group or a simulation group. Within three months, each nurse performed ten consecutive ultrasound-guided PIV placements in clinical settings. In the simulation group, the first five procedures were performed with simulation support and the last five without, to assess skill transfer. The primary outcome was procedural success rate. Results A total of 200 clinical procedures were analyzed. The overall success rate was 78.0%, with no significant difference between the control and simulation groups (77.9% vs 78.1%, p=1.000). Procedures in the simulation group were associated with longer completion times compared with the control group (12.23 vs 10.99 minutes, p=0.021). Learning curve analyses showed numerical improvements in procedure time over successive attempts in both groups, but no significant acceleration of learning in the simulation group. Self-perceived mastery did not differ between groups and remained stable over time. Conclusions Integrating advanced simulation tools into an existing nurse training curriculum did not improve procedural success and was associated with longer procedure times. These findings suggest that the educational impact of simulation depends less on technology alone than on its curricular integration and support for skill transfer. Conflict of interest Lucas di Meglio: nothing to disclose

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Stroke Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.927
Primary Topic
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1976 SIMULATION-ASSISTED TRAINING FOR ULTRASOUND-GUIDED PERIPHERAL IV ACCESS IN NURSES: A RANDOMIZED EDUCATIONAL STUDY

Lucas Di Meglio, Mikaël Mazighi, Estelle Dubus, Rachel Sossa et al.
European Stroke Journal
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1976 SIMULATION-ASSISTED TRAINING FOR ULTRASOUND-GUIDED PERIPHERAL IV ACCESS IN NURSES: A RANDOMIZED EDUCATIONAL STUDY

Lucas Di Meglio, Mikaël Mazighi, Estelle Dubus, Rachel Sossa, Anas Halouia, Fanny Timera
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims Ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter (PIV) placement is increasingly performed by nurses and requires the acquisition of complex visuomotor and cognitive skills. Advanced simulation technologies have been developed to facilitate learning, yet their educational benefit when integrated into existing training curricula remains uncertain. Methods We conducted a single-center, randomized educational study comparing standard training with simulation-assisted training for ultrasound-guided PIV placement among nurses. Twenty nurses were randomized to a control group or a simulation group. Within three months, each nurse performed ten consecutive ultrasound-guided PIV placements in clinical settings. In the simulation group, the first five procedures were performed with simulation support and the last five without, to assess skill transfer. The primary outcome was procedural success rate. Results A total of 200 clinical procedures were analyzed. The overall success rate was 78.0%, with no significant difference between the control and simulation groups (77.9% vs 78.1%, p=1.000). Procedures in the simulation group were associated with longer completion times compared with the control group (12.23 vs 10.99 minutes, p=0.021). Learning curve analyses showed numerical improvements in procedure time over successive attempts in both groups, but no significant acceleration of learning in the simulation group. Self-perceived mastery did not differ between groups and remained stable over time. Conclusions Integrating advanced simulation tools into an existing nurse training curriculum did not improve procedural success and was associated with longer procedure times. These findings suggest that the educational impact of simulation depends less on technology alone than on its curricular integration and support for skill transfer. Conflict of interest Lucas di Meglio: nothing to disclose

European Stroke JournalVol. 11(Supplement_1)
Inserm (FR), Institut Universitaire de France (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR), Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Hôpital Lariboisière (FR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.