ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A192 GENERAL ANESTHESIA VERSUS CONSCIOUS SEDATION DURING ENDOVASCULAR THROMBECTOMY FOR ACUTE ISCHEMIC STROKE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS

Abstract Background and aims The optimal anesthetic strategy during endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) remains uncertain. While general anesthesia (GA) offers immobility, conscious sedation (CS) may expedite the procedure and reduce hemodynamic instability. We aimed to compare functional, technical, and safety outcomes of GA versus CS during EVT using an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs comparing GA with CS in adults undergoing EVT for AIS (PROSPERO CRD420251168437). We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Central from inception to 15 October 2025. The clinical outcome was functional independence (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-2) at 90 days. The technical outcome was successful reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction [mTICI] 2b-3). The safety outcome was 90-day mortality. Random-effects models with the Hartung–Knapp–Sidik–Jonkman method were used. Results Nine RCTs comprising 1,460 patients (GA: n=726; CS: n=734) were included. GA was associated with higher rates of successful reperfusion compared with CS (RR 1.11; 95% CI 1.03-1.19; p=0.01). However, there was no significant difference in functional independence at 90 days (RR 1.13; 95% CI 0.93-1.39; p=0.22). Furthermore, 90-day mortality did not differ between groups (RR 0.89; 95% CI 0.60-1.31; p=0.55). Conclusions GA was associated with higher rates of successful reperfusion compared to CS during EVT for AIS. However, this technical advantage did not translate into significant differences in functional independence or mortality at 90 days. Anesthetic choice should be individualized based on patient characteristics and local expertise. Conflict of interest Shih-Syuan Wang: nothing to disclose. Aashish Baniya: nothing to disclose. Sanghyo Lee: nothing to disclose. Oluwaseun Williams: nothing to disclose. Hyunah Choi: nothing to disclose. Chun-Yu Peng: nothing to disclose. Shao-Wei Lo: nothing to disclose. Tsu-Hsien Wang: nothing to disclose. Wei-Jun Lee: nothing to disclose. Cho-Han Chiang: nothing to disclose. Figure 1 - belongs to Results

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Stroke Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.213
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A192 GENERAL ANESTHESIA VERSUS CONSCIOUS SEDATION DURING ENDOVASCULAR THROMBECTOMY FOR ACUTE ISCHEMIC STROKE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS

Shih‐Syuan Wang, B. Lee, Tsu-Hsien Wang, W Lee et al.
European Stroke Journal
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A192 GENERAL ANESTHESIA VERSUS CONSCIOUS SEDATION DURING ENDOVASCULAR THROMBECTOMY FOR ACUTE ISCHEMIC STROKE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS

Shih‐Syuan Wang, B. Lee, Tsu-Hsien Wang, W Lee, Chun-Yu Peng, Oluwaseun Williams, Aashish Baniya, Cho-Han Chiang, Shao-Wei Lo, Choi Hyunah
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims The optimal anesthetic strategy during endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) remains uncertain. While general anesthesia (GA) offers immobility, conscious sedation (CS) may expedite the procedure and reduce hemodynamic instability. We aimed to compare functional, technical, and safety outcomes of GA versus CS during EVT using an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs comparing GA with CS in adults undergoing EVT for AIS (PROSPERO CRD420251168437). We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Central from inception to 15 October 2025. The clinical outcome was functional independence (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-2) at 90 days. The technical outcome was successful reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction [mTICI] 2b-3). The safety outcome was 90-day mortality. Random-effects models with the Hartung–Knapp–Sidik–Jonkman method were used. Results Nine RCTs comprising 1,460 patients (GA: n=726; CS: n=734) were included. GA was associated with higher rates of successful reperfusion compared with CS (RR 1.11; 95% CI 1.03-1.19; p=0.01). However, there was no significant difference in functional independence at 90 days (RR 1.13; 95% CI 0.93-1.39; p=0.22). Furthermore, 90-day mortality did not differ between groups (RR 0.89; 95% CI 0.60-1.31; p=0.55). Conclusions GA was associated with higher rates of successful reperfusion compared to CS during EVT for AIS. However, this technical advantage did not translate into significant differences in functional independence or mortality at 90 days. Anesthetic choice should be individualized based on patient characteristics and local expertise. Conflict of interest Shih-Syuan Wang: nothing to disclose. Aashish Baniya: nothing to disclose. Sanghyo Lee: nothing to disclose. Oluwaseun Williams: nothing to disclose. Hyunah Choi: nothing to disclose. Chun-Yu Peng: nothing to disclose. Shao-Wei Lo: nothing to disclose. Tsu-Hsien Wang: nothing to disclose. Wei-Jun Lee: nothing to disclose. Cho-Han Chiang: nothing to disclose. Figure 1 - belongs to Results

European Stroke JournalVol. 11(Supplement_1)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Northwell Health (US), Harvard University (US), SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University (US), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.