ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026LB147 EFFECT OF TIME TO TREATMENT WITH INTRAVENOUS TENECTEPLASE ON CLINICAL OUTCOMES IN ACUTE ISCHEMIC STROKE: A SECONDARY ANALYSIS OF THE TRACE-III TRIAL

Abstract Background and aims We aimed to assess the effect of time to treatment on clinical outcomes in patients who received intravenous tenecteplase versus standard medical treatment between 4.5 and 24 hours after last known well (LKW). Methods This secondary analysis of the Tenecteplase Reperfusion Therapy in Acute Ischemic Cerebrovascular Events-III (TRACE-III) trial explored the association of LKW-to treatment time, analyzed as both categorical (4.5-9, 9-16, and 16-24 hours) and continuous variables, with 90-day functional outcomes and safety outcomes including symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and mortality. Results Among 516 patients, 134 were treated within 4.5-9 hours, 232 within 9-16 hours, and 150 within 16-24 hours after LKW. The primary outcome (mRS 0-1) occurred in 31.9% versus 23.1% of patients receiving tenecteplase and standard medical treatment within 4.5-9 hours (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59 to 3.17; adjusted P=0.470); 30.6% versus 21.3% within 9-16 hours (aOR, 1.69; 95%CI, 0.88 to 3.25; adjusted P=0.115); and 38.0% versus 29.1% within 16-24 hours (aOR, 1.98; 95%CI, 0.92 to 4.29; adjusted P=0.081). There was no statistically significant association between each 1-hour treatment delay and efficacy outcomes or symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in either treatment arm, whereas mortality exhibited an inverse trend, with lower rates observed with longer treatment delays. Overall, no significant interaction between LKW-to-treatment time and treatment assignments was discovered (all p for interaction >0.1). Conclusions Collectively, these findings support the use of tenecteplase in TRACE-III-qualified patients throughout the entire 4.5-24-hour window and highlight the potential for extending the therapeutic window beyond 24 hours. Conflict of interest

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Stroke Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.1916
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026LB147 EFFECT OF TIME TO TREATMENT WITH INTRAVENOUS TENECTEPLASE ON CLINICAL OUTCOMES IN ACUTE ISCHEMIC STROKE: A SECONDARY ANALYSIS OF THE TRACE-III TRIAL

Zhu Cao, Manjun Hao, Shuangzhe Wu, Yunyun Xiong et al.
European Stroke Journal
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026LB147 EFFECT OF TIME TO TREATMENT WITH INTRAVENOUS TENECTEPLASE ON CLINICAL OUTCOMES IN ACUTE ISCHEMIC STROKE: A SECONDARY ANALYSIS OF THE TRACE-III TRIAL

Zhu Cao, Manjun Hao, Shuangzhe Wu, Yunyun Xiong, Liyuan Wang, Yongjun Wang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims We aimed to assess the effect of time to treatment on clinical outcomes in patients who received intravenous tenecteplase versus standard medical treatment between 4.5 and 24 hours after last known well (LKW). Methods This secondary analysis of the Tenecteplase Reperfusion Therapy in Acute Ischemic Cerebrovascular Events-III (TRACE-III) trial explored the association of LKW-to treatment time, analyzed as both categorical (4.5-9, 9-16, and 16-24 hours) and continuous variables, with 90-day functional outcomes and safety outcomes including symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and mortality. Results Among 516 patients, 134 were treated within 4.5-9 hours, 232 within 9-16 hours, and 150 within 16-24 hours after LKW. The primary outcome (mRS 0-1) occurred in 31.9% versus 23.1% of patients receiving tenecteplase and standard medical treatment within 4.5-9 hours (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59 to 3.17; adjusted P=0.470); 30.6% versus 21.3% within 9-16 hours (aOR, 1.69; 95%CI, 0.88 to 3.25; adjusted P=0.115); and 38.0% versus 29.1% within 16-24 hours (aOR, 1.98; 95%CI, 0.92 to 4.29; adjusted P=0.081). There was no statistically significant association between each 1-hour treatment delay and efficacy outcomes or symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in either treatment arm, whereas mortality exhibited an inverse trend, with lower rates observed with longer treatment delays. Overall, no significant interaction between LKW-to-treatment time and treatment assignments was discovered (all p for interaction >0.1). Conclusions Collectively, these findings support the use of tenecteplase in TRACE-III-qualified patients throughout the entire 4.5-24-hour window and highlight the potential for extending the therapeutic window beyond 24 hours. Conflict of interest

European Stroke JournalVol. 11(Supplement_1)
Beijing Tian Tan Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.