Deep Learning Morphometric Analysis on Protocol Biopsies Predicts Future Graft Function

<h2>Abstract</h2><h3>Introduction</h3> The predictive value of Banff Classification in protocol transplant biopsies without specific lesions is limited. Morphometry provides precise data on microstructures, surpassing semi-quantitative scores but is time-consuming. This study evaluates whether automated morphometric analysis with deep learning can predict glomerular filtration rate at three years using machine learning. <h3>Methods</h3> This retrospective study included kidney transplant recipients who underwent protocol biopsy without specific lesion. The models were trained and tested on the Training/Test cohort, with external validation on the Application cohort. Eight deep learning algorithms extracted 23 morphometric parameters from whole-slide images. Ten machine learning models were tested for three years glomerular filtration rates prediction. <h3>Results</h3> A total of 367 patients were included. The means three-year estimated glomerular filtration rates were 53±23 and 53±22 mL/min/1.73m<sup>2</sup> in the Training/Test and Application cohorts, respectively. In the Training/Test cohort, estimated glomerular filtration rate correlated negatively with interstitial fibrosis (r=-0.33; p<0.001), tubular atrophy (r=-0.39; p<0.001), artery luminal stenosis (r=-0.29; p<0.001), and positively with glomerular density (r=0.16; p<0.05) and glomerular epithelial (r=0.33; p<0.001), endothelial (r=0.30; p<0.001), and mesangial (r=0.25; p=0.002) cell densities. Kernel Ridge and Bayesian models achieved the best predictions (Mean Absolute Error=11±1 mL/min/1.73m<sup>2</sup>). External validation showed good association between predicted with Kernel Ridge model and observed estimated glomerular filtration rate (Mean Absolute Error=13±11 mL/min/1.73m<sup>2</sup>, r=0.68; p<0.001). After correction with Bland Altman Bias, paired analysis showed no significant difference between predicted and observed estimated glomerular filtration rates (p=0.953). <h3>Conclusion</h3> Integrating Automated morphometric analyses into machine learning models may help predict glomerular filtration rates three years after protocol biopsies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Kidney International Reports
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ekir.2026.106585
Primary Topic
Gene expression and cancer classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deep Learning Morphometric Analysis on Protocol Biopsies Predicts Future Graft Function

Jamal Bamoulid, Manon Ansart, Fanny Buron, Rémi Lenain et al.
Kidney International Reports
Gene expression and cancer classification
article

Deep Learning Morphometric Analysis on Protocol Biopsies Predicts Future Graft Function

Jamal Bamoulid, Manon Ansart, Fanny Buron, Rémi Lenain, Jean‐Baptiste Gibier, Alexia Gazeu, Maud Rabeyrin, Michel Paindavoine, Claire Tinel, Patrick Bard, Georges Tarris, Mehdi Maanaoui, Mathieu Legendre, Sophie Félix, Laurent Martin, Mira Ben Haberou, Sami Ezzahid, Cécile Picard, Cécile Courivaud, Hugo Gabriel Pereira De Almeida, Alice Koenig
article en

Abstract

<h2>Abstract</h2><h3>Introduction</h3> The predictive value of Banff Classification in protocol transplant biopsies without specific lesions is limited. Morphometry provides precise data on microstructures, surpassing semi-quantitative scores but is time-consuming. This study evaluates whether automated morphometric analysis with deep learning can predict glomerular filtration rate at three years using machine learning. <h3>Methods</h3> This retrospective study included kidney transplant recipients who underwent protocol biopsy without specific lesion. The models were trained and tested on the Training/Test cohort, with external validation on the Application cohort. Eight deep learning algorithms extracted 23 morphometric parameters from whole-slide images. Ten machine learning models were tested for three years glomerular filtration rates prediction. <h3>Results</h3> A total of 367 patients were included. The means three-year estimated glomerular filtration rates were 53±23 and 53±22 mL/min/1.73m<sup>2</sup> in the Training/Test and Application cohorts, respectively. In the Training/Test cohort, estimated glomerular filtration rate correlated negatively with interstitial fibrosis (r=-0.33; p<0.001), tubular atrophy (r=-0.39; p<0.001), artery luminal stenosis (r=-0.29; p<0.001), and positively with glomerular density (r=0.16; p<0.05) and glomerular epithelial (r=0.33; p<0.001), endothelial (r=0.30; p<0.001), and mesangial (r=0.25; p=0.002) cell densities. Kernel Ridge and Bayesian models achieved the best predictions (Mean Absolute Error=11±1 mL/min/1.73m<sup>2</sup>). External validation showed good association between predicted with Kernel Ridge model and observed estimated glomerular filtration rate (Mean Absolute Error=13±11 mL/min/1.73m<sup>2</sup>, r=0.68; p<0.001). After correction with Bland Altman Bias, paired analysis showed no significant difference between predicted and observed estimated glomerular filtration rates (p=0.953). <h3>Conclusion</h3> Integrating Automated morphometric analyses into machine learning models may help predict glomerular filtration rates three years after protocol biopsies.

Kidney International Reports
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université de Bourgogne (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon (FR), Hospices Civils de Lyon (FR), CHU Dijon Bourgogne (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Gene expression and cancer classification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.