ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1095 LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP OF PARTICIPANTS IN THE TAKING CHARGE AFTER STROKE RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Abstract Background and aims The Take Charge intervention (TC) is a conversation-based, community intervention shown to improve independence, and physical health 12 months after stroke in the TaCAS study. (Taking Charge After Stroke). The TaCAS study recruited 400 participants discharged after stroke, randomized within 16 weeks to one of 3 groups: 1 TC session, 2 sessions 6 weeks apart, or no sessions (control). Methods This paper reports long-term outcomes of TaCAS participants 5-6 years after their index stroke who are still alive and willing to answer questions. Outcomes were collected by postal questionnaire or telephone call. The primary outcome was the Physical Component Summary (PCS) of the Short Form 36, comparing TC and control. Secondary outcomes were: Frenchay Activities Index (FAI); modified Rankin Scale (mRS); survival; and stroke recurrence. Outcomes were compared with those 12 months after stroke. Analysis was by ANOVA or logistic regression. Results Mortality data were available for all 400 participants; functional data for 204/297 (69%) of survivors. The mean difference (95% CI) in PCS between TC and control groups was 2.8 (−0.8 to 6.5) units, P = 0.12, and for independence (mRS score, 0–2) the odds ratio (95% CI) was 0.56 (0.28–1.16), P = 0.11, both favoring TC with similar point estimates to those after 12 months. Differences between TC and control participants for FAI scores, survival, and stroke recurrence were small and nonsignificant. Conclusions The clinically significant improvements in physical health and independence for TC participants, observed at 12 months, were sustained 5 to 6 years after stroke, but no longer statistically significant. Conflict of interest Alexander Martin: nothing to disclose.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Stroke Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.071
Primary Topic
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1095 LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP OF PARTICIPANTS IN THE TAKING CHARGE AFTER STROKE RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Alexander Martin, Mark Weatherall, Sajida Joya, Zamir Joya et al.
European Stroke Journal
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1095 LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP OF PARTICIPANTS IN THE TAKING CHARGE AFTER STROKE RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Alexander Martin, Mark Weatherall, Sajida Joya, Zamir Joya, John Gommans, Allie Eathorne, Gabrielle Shortt, Harry McNaughton, Vivian Fu, Alex Semprini
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims The Take Charge intervention (TC) is a conversation-based, community intervention shown to improve independence, and physical health 12 months after stroke in the TaCAS study. (Taking Charge After Stroke). The TaCAS study recruited 400 participants discharged after stroke, randomized within 16 weeks to one of 3 groups: 1 TC session, 2 sessions 6 weeks apart, or no sessions (control). Methods This paper reports long-term outcomes of TaCAS participants 5-6 years after their index stroke who are still alive and willing to answer questions. Outcomes were collected by postal questionnaire or telephone call. The primary outcome was the Physical Component Summary (PCS) of the Short Form 36, comparing TC and control. Secondary outcomes were: Frenchay Activities Index (FAI); modified Rankin Scale (mRS); survival; and stroke recurrence. Outcomes were compared with those 12 months after stroke. Analysis was by ANOVA or logistic regression. Results Mortality data were available for all 400 participants; functional data for 204/297 (69%) of survivors. The mean difference (95% CI) in PCS between TC and control groups was 2.8 (−0.8 to 6.5) units, P = 0.12, and for independence (mRS score, 0–2) the odds ratio (95% CI) was 0.56 (0.28–1.16), P = 0.11, both favoring TC with similar point estimates to those after 12 months. Differences between TC and control participants for FAI scores, survival, and stroke recurrence were small and nonsignificant. Conclusions The clinically significant improvements in physical health and independence for TC participants, observed at 12 months, were sustained 5 to 6 years after stroke, but no longer statistically significant. Conflict of interest Alexander Martin: nothing to disclose.

European Stroke JournalVol. 11(Supplement_1)
Wellington Institute of Technology (NZ), University of Calgary (CA), Wellington Hospital (NZ), Victoria University of Wellington (NZ), Hawke's Bay Hospital (NZ), Victoria University (UG), Medical Research Institute of New Zealand (NZ), University of Otago (NZ)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.