ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A250 MULTIMODALITY IMAGING FOR PATENT FORAMEN OVALE EVALUATION (MAINFRAME)

Abstract Background and aims Patient foramen ovale (PFO) is a stroke risk factor evaluated using transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE), transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE), transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD), and cardiac computed tomography (CCT). TCD is non-invasive, but its diagnostic performance relative to other modalities is unclear. We hypothesized that TCD has high sensitivity but low specificity for PFO detection. Methods We conducted an IRB-approved, single-center retrospective study of patients undergoing TCD for right-to-left shunt (RLS) detection between January 2024 and April 2025. Patients were identified from the Neurosonology Laboratory Quality Database. Records were reviewed for demographics, comorbidities, and TTE, TEE, and CCT findings. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated for TCD, TTE, and CCT relative to TEE, the gold standard. The sensitivity and specificity of TCD versus TTE were compared using McNemar test. Results Ninety-two patients were included. Mean age was 52.66 ± 15.78 years, and 51% were female; qualifying events included ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. RLS was detected in 53 patients (57.6%) by TCD, 17 (30%) by TTE, 18 (28.5%) by TEE, and 3 (21%) by CCT. TCD demonstrated 94% sensitivity and 53% specificity, (PPV 66%, NPV 89%). TTE showed 50% sensitivity and 82% specificity (PPV: 75%, NPV 61%), while CCT showed 33% sensitivity and 100% specificity (PPV 100%, NPV 33.3%). TCD had significantly higher sensitivity than TTE for RLS detection (p=0.039) with a non-significant difference in specificity (p=0.062), using TEE as the reference. Conclusions TCD has high sensitivity for RLS detection in patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. Conflict of interest Rachel Knopp: nothing to disclose; Kelly Flemming: nothing to disclose; Eugene Scharf: nothing to disclose; Zafer Keser: nothing to disclose; Jessica Prink: nothing to disclose; Shari Johnson: nothing to disclose; Guy Reeder: nothing to disclose; Robert Brown: nothing to disclose; William Harmsen: nothing to disclose; Muhib Khan: nothing to disclose Table 1 - belongs to Results

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Stroke Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.225
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A250 MULTIMODALITY IMAGING FOR PATENT FORAMEN OVALE EVALUATION (MAINFRAME)

Shari Johnson, Zafer Keser, R D Brown, William Harmsen et al.
European Stroke Journal
Cardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A250 MULTIMODALITY IMAGING FOR PATENT FORAMEN OVALE EVALUATION (MAINFRAME)

Shari Johnson, Zafer Keser, R D Brown, William Harmsen, Muhib Khan, Jessica Prink, Eugene Scharf, Rachel Knopp, Kelly Flemming, Guy Reeder
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims Patient foramen ovale (PFO) is a stroke risk factor evaluated using transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE), transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE), transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD), and cardiac computed tomography (CCT). TCD is non-invasive, but its diagnostic performance relative to other modalities is unclear. We hypothesized that TCD has high sensitivity but low specificity for PFO detection. Methods We conducted an IRB-approved, single-center retrospective study of patients undergoing TCD for right-to-left shunt (RLS) detection between January 2024 and April 2025. Patients were identified from the Neurosonology Laboratory Quality Database. Records were reviewed for demographics, comorbidities, and TTE, TEE, and CCT findings. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated for TCD, TTE, and CCT relative to TEE, the gold standard. The sensitivity and specificity of TCD versus TTE were compared using McNemar test. Results Ninety-two patients were included. Mean age was 52.66 ± 15.78 years, and 51% were female; qualifying events included ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. RLS was detected in 53 patients (57.6%) by TCD, 17 (30%) by TTE, 18 (28.5%) by TEE, and 3 (21%) by CCT. TCD demonstrated 94% sensitivity and 53% specificity, (PPV 66%, NPV 89%). TTE showed 50% sensitivity and 82% specificity (PPV: 75%, NPV 61%), while CCT showed 33% sensitivity and 100% specificity (PPV 100%, NPV 33.3%). TCD had significantly higher sensitivity than TTE for RLS detection (p=0.039) with a non-significant difference in specificity (p=0.062), using TEE as the reference. Conclusions TCD has high sensitivity for RLS detection in patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. Conflict of interest Rachel Knopp: nothing to disclose; Kelly Flemming: nothing to disclose; Eugene Scharf: nothing to disclose; Zafer Keser: nothing to disclose; Jessica Prink: nothing to disclose; Shari Johnson: nothing to disclose; Guy Reeder: nothing to disclose; Robert Brown: nothing to disclose; William Harmsen: nothing to disclose; Muhib Khan: nothing to disclose Table 1 - belongs to Results

European Stroke JournalVol. 11(Supplement_1)
Mayo Clinic (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Cardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.