ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A850 ASPECTS AS A SURROGATE MARKER OF CORE-PERFUSION MISMATCH IN LATE-WINDOW LARGE VESSEL OCCLUSION STROKE

Abstract Background and aims In acute stroke due to large vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO), identifying a core-perfusion mismatch guides reperfusion therapy in extended time windows, but perfusion imaging is not universally available. We assessed whether the ASPECTS score is associated with core-perfusion mismatch and could serve as a surrogate imaging marker. Methods We retrospectively analyzed a large multicenter international cohort of consecutive AIS-LVO (ICA or M1) imaged 4.5-24 hours from last time seen well, with baseline CT- or MR-perfusion imaging. Core-perfusion mismatch was defined as a volume ≥ 15 mL and ratio ≥ 1.8 using automated software. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed to identify optimal ASPECTS cutoffs for mismatch classification. Results Overall, 531 patients were included (CT, n = 182; MRI, n = 349). Core-perfusion mismatch was present in 86% of the CT cohort and 62% of the MRI cohort. In the MRI cohort, ASPECTS predicted mismatch with an AUC-ROC of 0.843 (95%CI, 0.797-0.890), with an optimal cutoff of ≥6, yielding a sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV) of 0.87, 0.72, 0.84, and 0.77, respectively. In the CT cohort, the AUC-ROC was 0.801 (95%CI, 0.698-0.904), with an optimal cutoff of ≥7, yielding a sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 0.74, 0.81, 0.96, and 0.34, respectively. Conclusions The high PPV of ASPECTS≥6 on MRI and ≥ 7 on CT supports their potential use as pragmatic inclusion criteria for patient selection in future late-window AIS-LVO trials when perfusion imaging is unavailable, as surrogate markers of salvageable tissue. Conversely, low ASPECTS values –especially on CT– do not exclude core-perfusion mismatch. Conflict of interest Nothing to disclose.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Stroke Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.054
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A850 ASPECTS AS A SURROGATE MARKER OF CORE-PERFUSION MISMATCH IN LATE-WINDOW LARGE VESSEL OCCLUSION STROKE

Davide Strambo, Emmanuel Carrera, Maarten Lansberg, Jean Marc Olivot et al.
European Stroke Journal
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A850 ASPECTS AS A SURROGATE MARKER OF CORE-PERFUSION MISMATCH IN LATE-WINDOW LARGE VESSEL OCCLUSION STROKE

Davide Strambo, Emmanuel Carrera, Maarten Lansberg, Jean Marc Olivot, Pierre Seners, Greg Albers, Nicole Yuen, Mirjam R. Heldner
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims In acute stroke due to large vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO), identifying a core-perfusion mismatch guides reperfusion therapy in extended time windows, but perfusion imaging is not universally available. We assessed whether the ASPECTS score is associated with core-perfusion mismatch and could serve as a surrogate imaging marker. Methods We retrospectively analyzed a large multicenter international cohort of consecutive AIS-LVO (ICA or M1) imaged 4.5-24 hours from last time seen well, with baseline CT- or MR-perfusion imaging. Core-perfusion mismatch was defined as a volume ≥ 15 mL and ratio ≥ 1.8 using automated software. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed to identify optimal ASPECTS cutoffs for mismatch classification. Results Overall, 531 patients were included (CT, n = 182; MRI, n = 349). Core-perfusion mismatch was present in 86% of the CT cohort and 62% of the MRI cohort. In the MRI cohort, ASPECTS predicted mismatch with an AUC-ROC of 0.843 (95%CI, 0.797-0.890), with an optimal cutoff of ≥6, yielding a sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV) of 0.87, 0.72, 0.84, and 0.77, respectively. In the CT cohort, the AUC-ROC was 0.801 (95%CI, 0.698-0.904), with an optimal cutoff of ≥7, yielding a sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 0.74, 0.81, 0.96, and 0.34, respectively. Conclusions The high PPV of ASPECTS≥6 on MRI and ≥ 7 on CT supports their potential use as pragmatic inclusion criteria for patient selection in future late-window AIS-LVO trials when perfusion imaging is unavailable, as surrogate markers of salvageable tissue. Conversely, low ASPECTS values –especially on CT– do not exclude core-perfusion mismatch. Conflict of interest Nothing to disclose.

European Stroke JournalVol. 11(Supplement_1)
University Hospital of Bern (CH), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse (FR), Hôpital Beau-Séjour (CH), Hôpital Orthopédique de la Suisse Romande (CH), Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild (FR), Stanford Medicine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.