ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1891 OUTCOMES AFTER BRIDGING THROMBOLYSIS IN ENDOVASCULARLY TREATED MEDIUM OR DISTAL VESSEL OCCLUSION STROKE - A MULTICENTER COHORT STUDY FROM THE EVA-TRISP COLLABORATION

Abstract Background and aims Recent RCTs of EVT in medium- or distal-vessel occlusion (MDVO) strokes (DISTAL, ESCAPE-MeVO) reported neutral outcomes. As trials may not represent patients treated in the real world, we analyzed such patients in a large multicenter registry, comparing outcomes of bridging therapy (IVT+EVT) versus EVT-alone. Methods We retrospectively analyzed registry data from EVA-TRISP (17 stroke centers, 2014-2023). Adults with MDVO (M2–M4 MCA, ACA, PCA) treated with EVT with or without prior IVT were included. The primary outcome was the 90-day mRS distribution, analyzed with a mixed-effects proportional-odds model adjusted for age, pre-stroke mRS, baseline NIHSS, diabetes, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and treatment year. Secondary outcomes were excellent (mRS0-1) and good (mRS0-2/return-to-premorbid) functional outcome, mortality, symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage, and successful recanalization (mTICI2b-3). Missing data were imputed; sensitivity analyses used complete-case and IPTW approaches. Results Among 3008 patients (median age 76, 45% of female sex, median NIHSS 10), 48% received bridging therapy. Adjusted analysis demonstrated better functional outcome (OR=1.60, 95%-CI 1.38-1.84, p < 0.001), higher odds of excellent (OR=1.75 95%-CI 1.45-2.11) and good (OR=1.63 95%-CI 1.36-1.96) recovery, and lower mortality (OR=0.63 95%-CI 0.50-0.78). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was modestly increased (5% vs. 3%; OR=1.68 95%-CI 1.13-2.51), while recanalization rates were comparable (70% vs. 69%; OR=1.07 95%-CI 0.89-1.28). Findings were consistent across complete-case and IPTW analyses. Conclusions These results suggest that, in real-world practice, adjunctive IVT may add benefit to EVT for MDVO-patients. Conflict of interest The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this abstract.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Stroke Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.892
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1891 OUTCOMES AFTER BRIDGING THROMBOLYSIS IN ENDOVASCULARLY TREATED MEDIUM OR DISTAL VESSEL OCCLUSION STROKE - A MULTICENTER COHORT STUDY FROM THE EVA-TRISP COLLABORATION

Alex Brehm, Alexander Otto, Anh Nguyên, Stefan Engelter et al.
European Stroke Journal
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1891 OUTCOMES AFTER BRIDGING THROMBOLYSIS IN ENDOVASCULARLY TREATED MEDIUM OR DISTAL VESSEL OCCLUSION STROKE - A MULTICENTER COHORT STUDY FROM THE EVA-TRISP COLLABORATION

Alex Brehm, Alexander Otto, Anh Nguyên, Stefan Engelter, Patrik Michel, Mirjam Heldner, Andrea Zini, Annika Nordanstig, Henrik Gensicke, Marios Psychogios
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims Recent RCTs of EVT in medium- or distal-vessel occlusion (MDVO) strokes (DISTAL, ESCAPE-MeVO) reported neutral outcomes. As trials may not represent patients treated in the real world, we analyzed such patients in a large multicenter registry, comparing outcomes of bridging therapy (IVT+EVT) versus EVT-alone. Methods We retrospectively analyzed registry data from EVA-TRISP (17 stroke centers, 2014-2023). Adults with MDVO (M2–M4 MCA, ACA, PCA) treated with EVT with or without prior IVT were included. The primary outcome was the 90-day mRS distribution, analyzed with a mixed-effects proportional-odds model adjusted for age, pre-stroke mRS, baseline NIHSS, diabetes, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and treatment year. Secondary outcomes were excellent (mRS0-1) and good (mRS0-2/return-to-premorbid) functional outcome, mortality, symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage, and successful recanalization (mTICI2b-3). Missing data were imputed; sensitivity analyses used complete-case and IPTW approaches. Results Among 3008 patients (median age 76, 45% of female sex, median NIHSS 10), 48% received bridging therapy. Adjusted analysis demonstrated better functional outcome (OR=1.60, 95%-CI 1.38-1.84, p < 0.001), higher odds of excellent (OR=1.75 95%-CI 1.45-2.11) and good (OR=1.63 95%-CI 1.36-1.96) recovery, and lower mortality (OR=0.63 95%-CI 0.50-0.78). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was modestly increased (5% vs. 3%; OR=1.68 95%-CI 1.13-2.51), while recanalization rates were comparable (70% vs. 69%; OR=1.07 95%-CI 0.89-1.28). Findings were consistent across complete-case and IPTW analyses. Conclusions These results suggest that, in real-world practice, adjunctive IVT may add benefit to EVT for MDVO-patients. Conflict of interest The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this abstract.

European Stroke JournalVol. 11(Supplement_1)
University of Bern (CH), University Hospital of Bern (CH), Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE), University Hospital of Basel (CH), Felix Platter-Hospital (CH), Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna (IT), University of Gothenburg (SE), University of Lausanne (CH)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.