ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A147 THROMBECTOMY WITH AND WITHOUT EMERGENT STENTING IN ACUTE ISCHEMIC STROKE DUE TO CAROTID ARTERY DISSECTION

Abstract Background and aims Whether thrombectomy with or without emergent carotid stenting improves outcomes in patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke due to carotid artery dissection (CAD) is unknown. Methods International multicenter observational study. Patients with LVO due to CAD undergoing thrombectomy with emergent stenting were compared to those without emergent stenting. The primary outcome was functional independence (modified Rankin Scale 0–2) at 3 months, secondary outcomes included early neurological improvement within 24–48 hours (ENI), successful recanalization, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) and mortality at 3 months. Inverse probability of treatment weighting and multivariable Poisson regression was used to adjust for group imbalances and to estimate the effect size, respectively. Results Of 516 patients (mean age 53,8 years, 76% male) undergoing thrombectomy, 167 (32.4%) and 349 (67.6%) were treated with or without emergent carotid stenting, respectively. After robust adjustment, emergent stenting was not associated with functional independence (adjusted risk ratio (aRR) = 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89–1.15) or ENI (aRR = 1.07, 95% CI 0.95–1.21) but with successful recanalization (aRR = 1.29, 95% CI 1.10–1.50) and reduced mortality at 3 months (aRR = 0.39, 95% CI 0.15-0.99). Risk of sICH was equivalent (aRR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.95–1.06). Conclusions In patients with LVO secondary to CAD, emergent stenting during endovascular procedure appeared safe, increased odds of successful recanalization and reduced 3-month mortality rates. However, intraprocedural stenting was not associated with better functional outcome. Conflict of interest Kaindl Lisa: nothing to declare, Giannakakis Michail: nothing to declare, Deutschmann Hannes: nothing to declare, Fiehler Jens: nothing to declare, Fischer Urs: nothing to declare, Dobrocky Tomas: nothing to declare, Poli Sven: nothing to declare, Sykora Marek: nothing to declare.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Stroke Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.008
Primary Topic
Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A147 THROMBECTOMY WITH AND WITHOUT EMERGENT STENTING IN ACUTE ISCHEMIC STROKE DUE TO CAROTID ARTERY DISSECTION

H Deutschmann, Michail Panagiotis Giannakakis, Urs Fischer, Sven Poli et al.
European Stroke Journal
Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A147 THROMBECTOMY WITH AND WITHOUT EMERGENT STENTING IN ACUTE ISCHEMIC STROKE DUE TO CAROTID ARTERY DISSECTION

H Deutschmann, Michail Panagiotis Giannakakis, Urs Fischer, Sven Poli, Jens Fiehler, Marek Sykora, Lisa Kaindl, Tomas Dobrocky
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims Whether thrombectomy with or without emergent carotid stenting improves outcomes in patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke due to carotid artery dissection (CAD) is unknown. Methods International multicenter observational study. Patients with LVO due to CAD undergoing thrombectomy with emergent stenting were compared to those without emergent stenting. The primary outcome was functional independence (modified Rankin Scale 0–2) at 3 months, secondary outcomes included early neurological improvement within 24–48 hours (ENI), successful recanalization, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) and mortality at 3 months. Inverse probability of treatment weighting and multivariable Poisson regression was used to adjust for group imbalances and to estimate the effect size, respectively. Results Of 516 patients (mean age 53,8 years, 76% male) undergoing thrombectomy, 167 (32.4%) and 349 (67.6%) were treated with or without emergent carotid stenting, respectively. After robust adjustment, emergent stenting was not associated with functional independence (adjusted risk ratio (aRR) = 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89–1.15) or ENI (aRR = 1.07, 95% CI 0.95–1.21) but with successful recanalization (aRR = 1.29, 95% CI 1.10–1.50) and reduced mortality at 3 months (aRR = 0.39, 95% CI 0.15-0.99). Risk of sICH was equivalent (aRR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.95–1.06). Conclusions In patients with LVO secondary to CAD, emergent stenting during endovascular procedure appeared safe, increased odds of successful recanalization and reduced 3-month mortality rates. However, intraprocedural stenting was not associated with better functional outcome. Conflict of interest Kaindl Lisa: nothing to declare, Giannakakis Michail: nothing to declare, Deutschmann Hannes: nothing to declare, Fiehler Jens: nothing to declare, Fischer Urs: nothing to declare, Dobrocky Tomas: nothing to declare, Poli Sven: nothing to declare, Sykora Marek: nothing to declare.

European Stroke JournalVol. 11(Supplement_1)
Sigmund Freud Privatuniversität Wien (AT), St. John's Hospital (US), Universität Hamburg (DE), Medical University of Graz (AT), University Hospital of Bern (CH), Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.