ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A2437 COMPARATIVE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF CONSERVATIVE VERSUS ENDOVASCULAR MANAGEMENT OF ISOLATED EXTRACRANIAL INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY STENO-OCCLUSIVE LESIONS DURING ACUTE ISCHEMIC STROKE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW META-ANALYSIS

Abstract Background and aims Isolated extracranial internal carotid artery (EC-ICA) stenosis or occlusion during acute ischemic stroke (AIS) represents a challenging clinical scenario with uncertain therapeutic strategy. Our aim was to conduct a meta-analysis summarizing the current evidence regarding therapeutic management approaches. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted including acute ischemic stroke due to EC-ICA occlusion treated with endovascular therapy (EVT) or best medical treatment (BMT) to compare the efficacy and safety of both approaches. Searches were performed in PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. Methodological quality: Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Random-effects models estimated pooled proportions and ORs with 95% CI. Meta-regression explored predictors of favorable outcome ([mRS] 0–2 at 90 days). Results Sixteen studies were included (n = 1,212 patients), 10 evaluating EVT and 6 BMT. In spite of milder strokes in BMT group (NIHSS 7.5±13.2 vs 13.2±7.1 in EVT), there was no significant difference between EVT (46%) and BMT (53%) in mRS at 90 days. Mortality was comparable (19% vs 17%), and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) rates were low in both groups. Meta-regression identified baseline NIHSS as the only independent predictor of functional outcome. Conclusions Our findings show that half of patients with acute isolated extracranial internal carotid artery disease achieve independence at 3 months, regardless of whether they are managed with EVT or BMT. Substantial imbalance in baseline characteristics between EVT and BMT cohorts precludes direct comparison of both approaches.EVT appears to be a safe and feasible option in selected patients. Randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm optimal acute treatment of EC-ICA. Conflict of interest Luis Manzano-Hernández: nothing to disclose

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Stroke Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.1110
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A2437 COMPARATIVE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF CONSERVATIVE VERSUS ENDOVASCULAR MANAGEMENT OF ISOLATED EXTRACRANIAL INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY STENO-OCCLUSIVE LESIONS DURING ACUTE ISCHEMIC STROKE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW META-ANALYSIS

Leire Ainz-Gómez, P. Palomino, D Villagrán-Sancho, Juan Antonio Cabezas Rodríguez et al.
European Stroke Journal
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A2437 COMPARATIVE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF CONSERVATIVE VERSUS ENDOVASCULAR MANAGEMENT OF ISOLATED EXTRACRANIAL INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY STENO-OCCLUSIVE LESIONS DURING ACUTE ISCHEMIC STROKE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW META-ANALYSIS

Leire Ainz-Gómez, P. Palomino, D Villagrán-Sancho, Juan Antonio Cabezas Rodríguez, H. H Andrade, A. VIDAL GONZÁLEZ, Asier de Albóniga-Chindurza, Elena Zapata Arriaza, Luis Manzano-Hernández, Andrés Hermosín-Gómez, Francisco Moniche, Marta Aguilar, Manuel Medina-Rodriguez, Carlota Villar Rodriguez, Luis Fernández Espigares
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims Isolated extracranial internal carotid artery (EC-ICA) stenosis or occlusion during acute ischemic stroke (AIS) represents a challenging clinical scenario with uncertain therapeutic strategy. Our aim was to conduct a meta-analysis summarizing the current evidence regarding therapeutic management approaches. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted including acute ischemic stroke due to EC-ICA occlusion treated with endovascular therapy (EVT) or best medical treatment (BMT) to compare the efficacy and safety of both approaches. Searches were performed in PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. Methodological quality: Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Random-effects models estimated pooled proportions and ORs with 95% CI. Meta-regression explored predictors of favorable outcome ([mRS] 0–2 at 90 days). Results Sixteen studies were included (n = 1,212 patients), 10 evaluating EVT and 6 BMT. In spite of milder strokes in BMT group (NIHSS 7.5±13.2 vs 13.2±7.1 in EVT), there was no significant difference between EVT (46%) and BMT (53%) in mRS at 90 days. Mortality was comparable (19% vs 17%), and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) rates were low in both groups. Meta-regression identified baseline NIHSS as the only independent predictor of functional outcome. Conclusions Our findings show that half of patients with acute isolated extracranial internal carotid artery disease achieve independence at 3 months, regardless of whether they are managed with EVT or BMT. Substantial imbalance in baseline characteristics between EVT and BMT cohorts precludes direct comparison of both approaches.EVT appears to be a safe and feasible option in selected patients. Randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm optimal acute treatment of EC-ICA. Conflict of interest Luis Manzano-Hernández: nothing to disclose

European Stroke JournalVol. 11(Supplement_1)
Fundación Pública Andaluza para la Gestión de la Investigación en Salud de Sevilla (ES), Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (ES), Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.