ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A2327 THE CRESCENDO PARADOX: HIGH-RISK PHENOTYPE WITH LOW-RISK SCORES — A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF STRICTLY DEFINED CRESCENDO TIA

Abstract Background Crescendo Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) is a high-risk clinical pattern. Although traditionally associated with high stroke risk, it remains unclear whether Crescendo TIA (cTIA) represents a distinct vascular risk profile compared with Single TIA (sTIA), or whether standard risk stratification tools such as the ABCD2 score accurately reflect its clinical urgency. Methods This retrospective single-center study included all patients diagnosed with TIA at Shafa Hospital (2018–2023). Strictly defined cTIA (≥2/24h, ≥3/72h, or >4/2 weeks; n=100) was compared with sTIA (n=479). Recurrent non-crescendo cases (n=29) were excluded due to higher chronic stroke burden (44.8%, P=0.004), indicating a separate phenotype. Demographics, risk factors, symptom duration, and ABCD2 scores were analyzed. Results Risk profiles were similar. No significant differences were found in age <60 (45% vs 44%, P=0.841), male sex (50% vs 51%, P=0.901), hypertension (51% vs 51%, P=0.991), diabetes (30% vs 27%, P=0.597), hyperlipidemia (26% vs 19%, P=0.158), ischemic heart disease (24% vs 24%, P=0.999), smoking (12% vs 12%, P=0.899), prior stroke (22% vs 16%, P=0.200), or opium use (24% vs 18%, P=0.388). However, cTIA presented with shorter symptoms: 46% lasted <10 minutes vs. 15% in sTIA (P<0.001). Consequently, fewer cTIA patients were classified as "High Risk" by ABCD2 ≥4 (49.0% vs 63.5%, P=0.006). Conclusion Crescendo TIA is a distinct phenotype of brief, repetitive ischemia, not explained by traditional risk factors. The ABCD2 score paradoxically underestimates its risk due to short symptom duration. Recognizing the crescendo pattern itself should drive urgent triage over reliance on risk scores. Conflict of interest Ali Mahyaei: nothing to disclose, Fatemeh Keshavarz: nothing to disclose, Aliakbar Zamanigerashi: nothing to disclose, Prof.Farhad Iranmanesh: nothing to disclose.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Stroke Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.1068
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A2327 THE CRESCENDO PARADOX: HIGH-RISK PHENOTYPE WITH LOW-RISK SCORES — A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF STRICTLY DEFINED CRESCENDO TIA

Farhad Iranmanesh, Ali Mahyaei, Fatemeh Keshavarz, Aliakbar Zamanigerashi
European Stroke Journal
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A2327 THE CRESCENDO PARADOX: HIGH-RISK PHENOTYPE WITH LOW-RISK SCORES — A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF STRICTLY DEFINED CRESCENDO TIA

Farhad Iranmanesh, Ali Mahyaei, Fatemeh Keshavarz, Aliakbar Zamanigerashi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Crescendo Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) is a high-risk clinical pattern. Although traditionally associated with high stroke risk, it remains unclear whether Crescendo TIA (cTIA) represents a distinct vascular risk profile compared with Single TIA (sTIA), or whether standard risk stratification tools such as the ABCD2 score accurately reflect its clinical urgency. Methods This retrospective single-center study included all patients diagnosed with TIA at Shafa Hospital (2018–2023). Strictly defined cTIA (≥2/24h, ≥3/72h, or >4/2 weeks; n=100) was compared with sTIA (n=479). Recurrent non-crescendo cases (n=29) were excluded due to higher chronic stroke burden (44.8%, P=0.004), indicating a separate phenotype. Demographics, risk factors, symptom duration, and ABCD2 scores were analyzed. Results Risk profiles were similar. No significant differences were found in age <60 (45% vs 44%, P=0.841), male sex (50% vs 51%, P=0.901), hypertension (51% vs 51%, P=0.991), diabetes (30% vs 27%, P=0.597), hyperlipidemia (26% vs 19%, P=0.158), ischemic heart disease (24% vs 24%, P=0.999), smoking (12% vs 12%, P=0.899), prior stroke (22% vs 16%, P=0.200), or opium use (24% vs 18%, P=0.388). However, cTIA presented with shorter symptoms: 46% lasted <10 minutes vs. 15% in sTIA (P<0.001). Consequently, fewer cTIA patients were classified as "High Risk" by ABCD2 ≥4 (49.0% vs 63.5%, P=0.006). Conclusion Crescendo TIA is a distinct phenotype of brief, repetitive ischemia, not explained by traditional risk factors. The ABCD2 score paradoxically underestimates its risk due to short symptom duration. Recognizing the crescendo pattern itself should drive urgent triage over reliance on risk scores. Conflict of interest Ali Mahyaei: nothing to disclose, Fatemeh Keshavarz: nothing to disclose, Aliakbar Zamanigerashi: nothing to disclose, Prof.Farhad Iranmanesh: nothing to disclose.

European Stroke JournalVol. 11(Supplement_1)
University of Milan (IT), Kerman University of Medical Sciences (IR), Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.