Sensitivity and Specificity of Reflectance Confocal Microscopy and Dermoscopy in Assessing Vitiligo Staging

BACKGROUND: Accurate staging of vitiligo is essential for effective treatment. Current staging primarily relies on clinical manifestations, patients' subjective reports, and physicians' assessments, which may introduce inaccuracies. Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) and dermoscopy are auxiliary diagnostic tools in dermatology that support the diagnosis and differentiation of vitiligo; they also assist in staging and evaluating therapeutic efficacy. AIMS: This study aimed to compare the sensitivity and specificity of RCM and dermoscopy in vitiligo staging, providing a more reliable reference for clinical application. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of clinical and imaging data from 218 patients with vitiligo who attended the Department of Dermatology at Wuhan No. 1 Hospital between December 2023 and November 2024. Clinical assessment methods-clinical features, Vitiligo Disease Activity score, Wood's lamp examination, and Koebner phenomenon-served as the reference standard for staging. Blinded evaluators independently conducted staging using RCM and dermoscopy. Each modality's sensitivity and specificity were calculated. RESULTS: Staging results based on RCM and dermoscopy showed strong concordance with clinical evaluation; Kappa values were 0.74 and 0.718, respectively (p < 0.01). The positive percent agreement and negative percent agreement of RCM staging with clinical assessment were 94.16% and 78.12%, respectively; those metrics for dermoscopy were 87.01% and 89.06%. RCM demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity than dermoscopy (p = 0.013), whereas dermoscopy showed significantly higher specificity than RCM (p = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: RCM and dermoscopy provide significant clinical value in vitiligo staging. RCM shows higher positive percent agreement for detecting progressive disease, whereas dermoscopy shows higher negative percent agreement for confirming stable disease. These tools offer an objective foundation for assessment and support clinical decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.70892
Primary Topic
melanin and skin pigmentation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sensitivity and Specificity of Reflectance Confocal Microscopy and Dermoscopy in Assessing Vitiligo Staging

Wenjing Liu, Liuqing Chen, Miaomiao Sun, Jiyuan Wu et al.
Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology
melanin and skin pigmentation
article

Sensitivity and Specificity of Reflectance Confocal Microscopy and Dermoscopy in Assessing Vitiligo Staging

Wenjing Liu, Liuqing Chen, Miaomiao Sun, Jiyuan Wu, Hongying Chen, Qian Jiang
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accurate staging of vitiligo is essential for effective treatment. Current staging primarily relies on clinical manifestations, patients' subjective reports, and physicians' assessments, which may introduce inaccuracies. Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) and dermoscopy are auxiliary diagnostic tools in dermatology that support the diagnosis and differentiation of vitiligo; they also assist in staging and evaluating therapeutic efficacy. AIMS: This study aimed to compare the sensitivity and specificity of RCM and dermoscopy in vitiligo staging, providing a more reliable reference for clinical application. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of clinical and imaging data from 218 patients with vitiligo who attended the Department of Dermatology at Wuhan No. 1 Hospital between December 2023 and November 2024. Clinical assessment methods-clinical features, Vitiligo Disease Activity score, Wood's lamp examination, and Koebner phenomenon-served as the reference standard for staging. Blinded evaluators independently conducted staging using RCM and dermoscopy. Each modality's sensitivity and specificity were calculated. RESULTS: Staging results based on RCM and dermoscopy showed strong concordance with clinical evaluation; Kappa values were 0.74 and 0.718, respectively (p < 0.01). The positive percent agreement and negative percent agreement of RCM staging with clinical assessment were 94.16% and 78.12%, respectively; those metrics for dermoscopy were 87.01% and 89.06%. RCM demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity than dermoscopy (p = 0.013), whereas dermoscopy showed significantly higher specificity than RCM (p = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: RCM and dermoscopy provide significant clinical value in vitiligo staging. RCM shows higher positive percent agreement for detecting progressive disease, whereas dermoscopy shows higher negative percent agreement for confirming stable disease. These tools offer an objective foundation for assessment and support clinical decision-making.

Journal of Cosmetic DermatologyVol. 25(5)
Hubei University of Chinese Medicine (CN), Wuhan No.1 Hospital (CN), Institute of Infection and Immunity (CA), Xiangyang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
melanin and skin pigmentation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.