ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026OT102 THE IMPROVE TRIAL: A RANDOMISED MULTICENTRE TRIAL TO INVESTIGATE THE CLINICAL IMPACT OF MRI-GUIDED SELECTION OF SYMPTOMATIC CAROTID STENOSIS PATIENTS FOR REVASCULARISATION

Abstract Background and aims Selection of symptomatic carotid stenosis patients for revascularisation remains suboptimal, as current predominantly stenosis-based selection does not fully reflect heterogeneity in stroke risk. IMPROVE calculates the 3-year ipsilateral ischemic stroke risk based on intraplaque haemorrhage on carotid MRI, stenosis degree and clinical characteristics. In our model–based cost-effectiveness analysis IMPROVE-guided selection for revascularisation reduced ipsilateral ischaemic strokes and perioperative strokes/deaths by 35%, while also substantially lowering costs. Methods To evaluate the clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of IMPROVE-guided versus care-as-usual (CAU)-guided selection of symptomatic patients with carotid stenosis for revascularisation. Results This multicentre randomized non-inferiority trial includes 613 recent TIA and non-disabling stroke patients (mRS≤3) with ipsilateral 30–99% carotid stenosis. Patients are randomized to IMPROVE- or CAU-guided revascularisation selection. In the IMPROVE-guided arm, patients with a predicted IMPROVE 3-year ipsilateral ischemic stroke risk ≥10% are recommended for revascularisation and optimised medical therapy (OMT). For patients with <10% risk, OMT-only is recommended. The primary outcome is any stroke or death within 44 days, or ipsilateral ischemic stroke during minimal three years of follow-up. Secondary outcomes include cardiovascular events, quality adjusted life years (QALYs), functional outcomes, and costs. Conclusions We expect that IMPROVE will be non-inferior to CAU for the primary outcome. A non-inferiority design is justified because the IMPROVE-strategy is expected to maintain at least equal effectiveness for the primary outcome, while it is expected to substantially reduce revascularisations and costs. Conflict of interest

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Stroke Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.2003
Primary Topic
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026OT102 THE IMPROVE TRIAL: A RANDOMISED MULTICENTRE TRIAL TO INVESTIGATE THE CLINICAL IMPACT OF MRI-GUIDED SELECTION OF SYMPTOMATIC CAROTID STENOSIS PATIENTS FOR REVASCULARISATION

Luc Smits, Gert Jan de Borst, Juul Bierens, Manuela Joore et al.
European Stroke Journal
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026OT102 THE IMPROVE TRIAL: A RANDOMISED MULTICENTRE TRIAL TO INVESTIGATE THE CLINICAL IMPACT OF MRI-GUIDED SELECTION OF SYMPTOMATIC CAROTID STENOSIS PATIENTS FOR REVASCULARISATION

Luc Smits, Gert Jan de Borst, Juul Bierens, Manuela Joore, Martine Truijman, Linda Jacobi-Postma, Robin Pleumeekers, Robert van Oostenbrugge, Paul Nederkoorn, M Eline Kooi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims Selection of symptomatic carotid stenosis patients for revascularisation remains suboptimal, as current predominantly stenosis-based selection does not fully reflect heterogeneity in stroke risk. IMPROVE calculates the 3-year ipsilateral ischemic stroke risk based on intraplaque haemorrhage on carotid MRI, stenosis degree and clinical characteristics. In our model–based cost-effectiveness analysis IMPROVE-guided selection for revascularisation reduced ipsilateral ischaemic strokes and perioperative strokes/deaths by 35%, while also substantially lowering costs. Methods To evaluate the clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of IMPROVE-guided versus care-as-usual (CAU)-guided selection of symptomatic patients with carotid stenosis for revascularisation. Results This multicentre randomized non-inferiority trial includes 613 recent TIA and non-disabling stroke patients (mRS≤3) with ipsilateral 30–99% carotid stenosis. Patients are randomized to IMPROVE- or CAU-guided revascularisation selection. In the IMPROVE-guided arm, patients with a predicted IMPROVE 3-year ipsilateral ischemic stroke risk ≥10% are recommended for revascularisation and optimised medical therapy (OMT). For patients with <10% risk, OMT-only is recommended. The primary outcome is any stroke or death within 44 days, or ipsilateral ischemic stroke during minimal three years of follow-up. Secondary outcomes include cardiovascular events, quality adjusted life years (QALYs), functional outcomes, and costs. Conclusions We expect that IMPROVE will be non-inferior to CAU for the primary outcome. A non-inferiority design is justified because the IMPROVE-strategy is expected to maintain at least equal effectiveness for the primary outcome, while it is expected to substantially reduce revascularisations and costs. Conflict of interest

European Stroke JournalVol. 11(Supplement_1)
University of Applied Sciences Utrecht (NL), Utrecht University (NL), Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), Maastricht University (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.