ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A2352 LONG-TERM EFFECTS OF SPECIALIST COMMUNITY STROKE REHABILITATION: ANALYSIS FROM A NATIONAL STROKE REGISTRY (SSNAP) AND SOUTH LONDON STROKE REGISTRY (SLSR)

Abstract Background and aims Specialist community-based Stroke Rehabilitation (SSR), delivered through Early Supported Discharge (ESD) and Community Stroke Rehabilitation (CSR), is increasingly provided within the Integrated Community Stroke Service model. This study aims to describe trends and case-mix and to evaluate the long-term impact of SSR on survival and other post-stroke outcomes. Methods Linked data of the South London Stroke Register to the Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme between 2013 and 2024 is used. SSR was defined as receipt of specialist ESD, CSR, or combined ESD–CSR services. Descriptive methods were used to compare case-mix. Survival up to five years post-stroke was examined using Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models. Outcomes included functional independence, Instrumental activities of daily living, cognitive impairment, depression and anxiety, and quality of life. Long-term outcomes were evaluated using doubly robust estimation with propensity score matching. Results Among 1,910 stroke survivors, 64% received SSR. SSR increased over time and was common among those with moderate functional disability at discharge (P < 0.00), Black ethnic groups (P < 0.00), and those living in private houses (P < 0.00). SSR associated with shorter inpatient stays and higher five-year survival (Log-rank test, P < 0.0034) or reduced risk of death (hazard ratio 0.62; 95% CI 0.51–0.76). SSR improved functional dependency at 3 months and 1 year post-stroke, with Barthel Index scores increasing by 2.7 and 2.1 points, respectively (P < 0.001), but no significant effects on other long-term outcomes. Conclusions SSR is associated with improved survival and functional outcomes following stroke, supporting continued investment in integrated community stroke rehabilitation services. Conflict of interest All authors: Nothing to disclose.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Stroke Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.154
Primary Topic
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A2352 LONG-TERM EFFECTS OF SPECIALIST COMMUNITY STROKE REHABILITATION: ANALYSIS FROM A NATIONAL STROKE REGISTRY (SSNAP) AND SOUTH LONDON STROKE REGISTRY (SLSR)

Wasana Kalansooriya, Rebecca Fisher, Abdel Douiri, CDA Wolfe et al.
European Stroke Journal
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A2352 LONG-TERM EFFECTS OF SPECIALIST COMMUNITY STROKE REHABILITATION: ANALYSIS FROM A NATIONAL STROKE REGISTRY (SSNAP) AND SOUTH LONDON STROKE REGISTRY (SLSR)

Wasana Kalansooriya, Rebecca Fisher, Abdel Douiri, CDA Wolfe, Matthew DL O’Connell, Julia Fox‐Rushby, Mark McGlinchey, Iain Marshall, Ajay Bhalla, Yanzhong Wang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims Specialist community-based Stroke Rehabilitation (SSR), delivered through Early Supported Discharge (ESD) and Community Stroke Rehabilitation (CSR), is increasingly provided within the Integrated Community Stroke Service model. This study aims to describe trends and case-mix and to evaluate the long-term impact of SSR on survival and other post-stroke outcomes. Methods Linked data of the South London Stroke Register to the Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme between 2013 and 2024 is used. SSR was defined as receipt of specialist ESD, CSR, or combined ESD–CSR services. Descriptive methods were used to compare case-mix. Survival up to five years post-stroke was examined using Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models. Outcomes included functional independence, Instrumental activities of daily living, cognitive impairment, depression and anxiety, and quality of life. Long-term outcomes were evaluated using doubly robust estimation with propensity score matching. Results Among 1,910 stroke survivors, 64% received SSR. SSR increased over time and was common among those with moderate functional disability at discharge (P < 0.00), Black ethnic groups (P < 0.00), and those living in private houses (P < 0.00). SSR associated with shorter inpatient stays and higher five-year survival (Log-rank test, P < 0.0034) or reduced risk of death (hazard ratio 0.62; 95% CI 0.51–0.76). SSR improved functional dependency at 3 months and 1 year post-stroke, with Barthel Index scores increasing by 2.7 and 2.1 points, respectively (P < 0.001), but no significant effects on other long-term outcomes. Conclusions SSR is associated with improved survival and functional outcomes following stroke, supporting continued investment in integrated community stroke rehabilitation services. Conflict of interest All authors: Nothing to disclose.

European Stroke JournalVol. 11(Supplement_1)
King's College London (GB), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.