ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1653 EFFECTS OF NON-INVASIVE BRAIN STIMULATION ON UPPER LIMB MOTOR RECOVERY AFTER STROKE

Abstract Background and aims Stroke is a leading cause of long-term disability worldwide, with upper limb motor impairment profoundly affecting independence and quality of life. Despite conventional rehabilitation, recovery is often incomplete, driving the pursuit of adjunct therapies like non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) to enhance neuroplasticity and functional outcomes. This review evaluates the effects of various NIBS modalities on upper limb motor recovery post-stroke to inform clinical practice. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. A PubMed search using MeSH terms ("Stroke" AND "Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation") identified 3,296 records. Filters for Randomized Clinical Trials published over the last 5 years and free full text yielded 79 studies. After the screening process, 13 studies were included. Results Trials evaluated protocols such as rTMS and theta-burst stimulation (TBS), often combined with peripheral stimulation (rPMS/ES). Outcomes were assessed via FMA-UE, ARAT, and Barthel Index. Active NIBS protocols, especially combined central-peripheral approaches, consistently outperformed conventional therapy in improving motor function, daily living, and reducing spasticity. Synergistic effects in combined protocols are attributed to enhanced cortical excitability with afferent feedback. Recovery mechanisms depended on baseline impairment: moderate-severe deficits correlated with increased interhemispheric connectivity, while mild impairment linked to intrahemispheric reorganization. Common limitations were small samples and limited long-term follow-up. Conclusions Conclusion: NIBS, particularly combined and personalized protocols, significantly enhances upper limb recovery post-stroke. The influence of baseline impairment severity on treatment response underscores the need for individualized strategies and neurophysiological monitoring in rehabilitation. Conflict of interest Isabela Bettu Bini: nothing to disclose. Lauren Zimmer Martins: nothing to disclose. Anna Thereza Rocha Pereira: nothing to disclose.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Stroke Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.1627
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1653 EFFECTS OF NON-INVASIVE BRAIN STIMULATION ON UPPER LIMB MOTOR RECOVERY AFTER STROKE

Isabela Bettu Bini, Lauren Zimmer Martins, Anna Rocha Pereira
European Stroke Journal
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1653 EFFECTS OF NON-INVASIVE BRAIN STIMULATION ON UPPER LIMB MOTOR RECOVERY AFTER STROKE

Isabela Bettu Bini, Lauren Zimmer Martins, Anna Rocha Pereira
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims Stroke is a leading cause of long-term disability worldwide, with upper limb motor impairment profoundly affecting independence and quality of life. Despite conventional rehabilitation, recovery is often incomplete, driving the pursuit of adjunct therapies like non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) to enhance neuroplasticity and functional outcomes. This review evaluates the effects of various NIBS modalities on upper limb motor recovery post-stroke to inform clinical practice. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. A PubMed search using MeSH terms ("Stroke" AND "Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation") identified 3,296 records. Filters for Randomized Clinical Trials published over the last 5 years and free full text yielded 79 studies. After the screening process, 13 studies were included. Results Trials evaluated protocols such as rTMS and theta-burst stimulation (TBS), often combined with peripheral stimulation (rPMS/ES). Outcomes were assessed via FMA-UE, ARAT, and Barthel Index. Active NIBS protocols, especially combined central-peripheral approaches, consistently outperformed conventional therapy in improving motor function, daily living, and reducing spasticity. Synergistic effects in combined protocols are attributed to enhanced cortical excitability with afferent feedback. Recovery mechanisms depended on baseline impairment: moderate-severe deficits correlated with increased interhemispheric connectivity, while mild impairment linked to intrahemispheric reorganization. Common limitations were small samples and limited long-term follow-up. Conclusions Conclusion: NIBS, particularly combined and personalized protocols, significantly enhances upper limb recovery post-stroke. The influence of baseline impairment severity on treatment response underscores the need for individualized strategies and neurophysiological monitoring in rehabilitation. Conflict of interest Isabela Bettu Bini: nothing to disclose. Lauren Zimmer Martins: nothing to disclose. Anna Thereza Rocha Pereira: nothing to disclose.

European Stroke JournalVol. 11(Supplement_1)
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (BR), Universidade do Planalto Catarinense (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.