Optimal Pace Timing for Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing with or without an Additional LV Lead: Results from the CSPOT study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The study aimed to determine optimal AV timing for left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) and optimal AV and VV timing for LBBAP optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy (LOT-CRT), to enhance the benefit of conduction system pacing. METHODS: Acute measurements of LV dP/dtmax and QRS duration were collected during sweeps of AV and VV delays during paired comparison of LBBAP, LOT-CRT, and biventricular pacing (BVP), in 48 CRT-indicated patients. Optimal AV delays were selected as the vertex of a parabolic model fit to the AV sweep results, obtained independently for LV dP/dtmax and QRS duration. RESULTS: LBBAP, LOT-CRT, and BVP were similarly sensitive to the choice of AV delay, and 60ms deviations from optimal AV delay resulted in an approximately 30% reduction in the hemodynamic benefits of resynchronization. Based upon LV dP/dtmax measurements, the average optimal paced AV (PAV) for LBBAP (152ms) was significantly shorter than that for LOT-CRT (171ms, p < 0.01) or BVP (167ms, p = 0.01). Based upon QRS duration, the average optimal PAV for LBBAP (164ms) was similar to that for LOT-CRT (160ms, p = 0.52) or BVP (165ms, p = 0.95). For each resynchronization modality, a linear regression between the patient's measured intrinsic AV conduction and their optimal AV delay provided a patient-specific AV delay, resulting in improved AV selection compared to applying a fixed AV delay to all patients. Finally, simultaneous activation (VV = 0) was best for both LOT-CRT and BVP. CONCLUSION: LBBAP, LOT-CRT, and BVP are similarly sensitive to AV-timing. Optimal AV delay is linearly related to intrinsic AV for each resynchronization modality. For LOT-CRT and BVP, simultaneous biventricular activation is best on average.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EP Europace
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euag103
Primary Topic
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimal Pace Timing for Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing with or without an Additional LV Lead: Results from the CSPOT study

Robert Stadler, Rafał Gardas, Bengt Herweg, Badrinathan Chandrasekaran et al.
EP Europace
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
article

Optimal Pace Timing for Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing with or without an Additional LV Lead: Results from the CSPOT study

Robert Stadler, Rafał Gardas, Bengt Herweg, Badrinathan Chandrasekaran, D’Anne Kudlik, Robert Waxman, Travis Richardson, P Vijayaraman, J Burrell, Jonathan Lyne, Paul Foley, Richard N Cornelussen, Patrick Zimmerman, Robert D Schaller, Gaurav A Upadhyay, Zachary Whinnett, Marek Jastrzębski
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The study aimed to determine optimal AV timing for left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) and optimal AV and VV timing for LBBAP optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy (LOT-CRT), to enhance the benefit of conduction system pacing. METHODS: Acute measurements of LV dP/dtmax and QRS duration were collected during sweeps of AV and VV delays during paired comparison of LBBAP, LOT-CRT, and biventricular pacing (BVP), in 48 CRT-indicated patients. Optimal AV delays were selected as the vertex of a parabolic model fit to the AV sweep results, obtained independently for LV dP/dtmax and QRS duration. RESULTS: LBBAP, LOT-CRT, and BVP were similarly sensitive to the choice of AV delay, and 60ms deviations from optimal AV delay resulted in an approximately 30% reduction in the hemodynamic benefits of resynchronization. Based upon LV dP/dtmax measurements, the average optimal paced AV (PAV) for LBBAP (152ms) was significantly shorter than that for LOT-CRT (171ms, p < 0.01) or BVP (167ms, p = 0.01). Based upon QRS duration, the average optimal PAV for LBBAP (164ms) was similar to that for LOT-CRT (160ms, p = 0.52) or BVP (165ms, p = 0.95). For each resynchronization modality, a linear regression between the patient's measured intrinsic AV conduction and their optimal AV delay provided a patient-specific AV delay, resulting in improved AV selection compared to applying a fixed AV delay to all patients. Finally, simultaneous activation (VV = 0) was best for both LOT-CRT and BVP. CONCLUSION: LBBAP, LOT-CRT, and BVP are similarly sensitive to AV-timing. Optimal AV delay is linearly related to intrinsic AV for each resynchronization modality. For LOT-CRT and BVP, simultaneous biventricular activation is best on average.

EP Europace
Jagiellonian University (PL), Medical University of Silesia (PL), Vanderbilt University (US), University of South Florida (US), Beacon College (US), Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (US), Tampa General Hospital (US), Great Western Hospital (GB), Bakken Museum (US), Medtronic (Ireland) (IE), University of Chicago (US), Lung Institute (US), Vanderbilt Health (US), Imperial College London (GB), Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.