ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1728 EVT IN PATIENTS WITH TANDEM LESIONS: EFFECT OF CAS AND EVT DEVICES

Abstract Background and aims 15–20% of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to anterior large vessel occlusion present with ipsilateral extracranial carotid artery stenosis >50% or occlusion, termed tandem lesions (TLs). The optimal endovascular treatment (EVT) strategy for TLs remains uncertain, particularly regarding carotid artery stenting (CAS) and thrombectomy technique. This study compared outcomes in TL patients treated with or without CAS during EVT and the impact of different thrombectomy approaches (aspiration alone [AA], stent retriever alone [SRA], or combined approach [CA]). Methods EVA-TRISP is a large international multicenter cohort study including consecutive AIS patients treated with EVT, 2016-2023. Outcomes included 3-month modified Rankin Scale (mRS), good functional outcome (mRS 0–2), complete angiographic recanalization, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and all-cause mortality. Results Among 13,702 EVT-treated patients, 1,545 (11.3%) had TLs; 596/1,545 (39%) underwent CAS. CAS was associated with higher odds of better functional outcome (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.33, 95% CI 1.09–1.62) without increased sICH or mortality. AA was used in 28.1%, SRA in 26.8%, and CA in 45.1%. SRA and CA were associated with higher odds of complete recanalization (aOR 1.96 [95% CI 1.38–2.78] & 1.99 [95% CI 1.48–2.67]), compared to AA. CA was not associated with functional benefit but rather with sICH (aOR 2.50, 95% CI 1.28–4.89). Conclusions CAS during EVT was associated with improved functional outcomes in TL patients without increased hemorrhagic risk or mortality. Stent retriever use improved recanalization, while combined techniques increased sICH risk without added clinical benefit. Conflict of interest T. van Elk: Nothing to disclose. N. Wali: Nothing to disclose. M. Uyttenboogaart: Nothing to disclose. H. Gensicke: Nothing to disclose. S. Engelter: Nothing to disclose. P.J. Nederkoorn: Nothing to disclose.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Stroke Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.815
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1728 EVT IN PATIENTS WITH TANDEM LESIONS: EFFECT OF CAS AND EVT DEVICES

Theodora van Elk, Paul Nederkoorn, Nabila Wali, Maarten Uyttenboogaart et al.
European Stroke Journal
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1728 EVT IN PATIENTS WITH TANDEM LESIONS: EFFECT OF CAS AND EVT DEVICES

Theodora van Elk, Paul Nederkoorn, Nabila Wali, Maarten Uyttenboogaart, Stefan Engelter, Henrik Gensicke
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims 15–20% of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to anterior large vessel occlusion present with ipsilateral extracranial carotid artery stenosis >50% or occlusion, termed tandem lesions (TLs). The optimal endovascular treatment (EVT) strategy for TLs remains uncertain, particularly regarding carotid artery stenting (CAS) and thrombectomy technique. This study compared outcomes in TL patients treated with or without CAS during EVT and the impact of different thrombectomy approaches (aspiration alone [AA], stent retriever alone [SRA], or combined approach [CA]). Methods EVA-TRISP is a large international multicenter cohort study including consecutive AIS patients treated with EVT, 2016-2023. Outcomes included 3-month modified Rankin Scale (mRS), good functional outcome (mRS 0–2), complete angiographic recanalization, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and all-cause mortality. Results Among 13,702 EVT-treated patients, 1,545 (11.3%) had TLs; 596/1,545 (39%) underwent CAS. CAS was associated with higher odds of better functional outcome (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.33, 95% CI 1.09–1.62) without increased sICH or mortality. AA was used in 28.1%, SRA in 26.8%, and CA in 45.1%. SRA and CA were associated with higher odds of complete recanalization (aOR 1.96 [95% CI 1.38–2.78] & 1.99 [95% CI 1.48–2.67]), compared to AA. CA was not associated with functional benefit but rather with sICH (aOR 2.50, 95% CI 1.28–4.89). Conclusions CAS during EVT was associated with improved functional outcomes in TL patients without increased hemorrhagic risk or mortality. Stent retriever use improved recanalization, while combined techniques increased sICH risk without added clinical benefit. Conflict of interest T. van Elk: Nothing to disclose. N. Wali: Nothing to disclose. M. Uyttenboogaart: Nothing to disclose. H. Gensicke: Nothing to disclose. S. Engelter: Nothing to disclose. P.J. Nederkoorn: Nothing to disclose.

European Stroke JournalVol. 11(Supplement_1)
University Medical Center Groningen (NL), University of Groningen (NL), Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL), Dialyse Centrum Groningen (NL), Felix Platter-Hospital (CH)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.