ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A61 COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF DIRECT ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS IN ATRIAL FIBRILLATION AFTER GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY

Abstract Background and aims Gastrointestinal (GI) surgery can alter GI anatomy and physiology, potentially affecting the effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Despite widespread use of DOACs in atrial fibrillation (AF), evidence comparing their effectiveness and safety in patients with prior GI surgery is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the comparative risk–benefit profiles of DOACs in this population. Methods Using a nationwide Korean claims database, this observational cohort study included patients with AF prescribed a DOAC (dabigatran, apixaban, edoxaban, or rivaroxaban) after GI surgery between 2014 and 2021. Risks of clinical outcomes including ischemic stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding, and their composites were evaluated. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to adjust for confounding. Results A total of 8,047 patients (mean age, 73.7 years; 34.3% male) were analyzed. Dabigatran was associated with a higher risk of ischemic stroke/systemic embolism than apixaban (hazard ratio [HR], 1.66; 95% CI, 1.01–2.73). Rivaroxaban was associated with increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) compared with apixaban (HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.02–2.98) and edoxaban (HR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.25–4.69). The risks of GI bleeding, overall major bleeding, and composite outcomes were broadly comparable across DOACs. Subgroup analyses across key covariates did not reveal any significant effect modifications. Conclusions In patients with AF and prior GI surgery, dabigatran was associated with greater thromboembolic risk and rivaroxaban with higher ICH risk compared with other DOACs. DOAC selection in this setting should account for drug-specific risk–benefit profiles in conjunction with individual patient’s thromboembolic and bleeding risks. Conflict of interest Jiyeon Ha : Nothing to disclose. Wookjin Yang: Nothing to disclose. Mi-Sook Kim: Nothing to disclose. Eung-Joon Lee: Nothing to disclose. Matthew Chung: Nothing to disclose. Boyeon Yang: Nothing to disclose. Hyemin Jang: Nothing to disclose. Jeong-Min Kim: Nothing to disclose. Keun-Hwa Jung: Nothing to disclose. Seung-Hoon Lee : Nothing to disclose. Figure 1 - belongs to Conclusions

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Stroke Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.178
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A61 COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF DIRECT ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS IN ATRIAL FIBRILLATION AFTER GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY

Jiyeon Ha, Boyeon Yang, Keun‐Hwa Jung, Jeong‐Min Kim et al.
European Stroke Journal
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A61 COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF DIRECT ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS IN ATRIAL FIBRILLATION AFTER GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY

Jiyeon Ha, Boyeon Yang, Keun‐Hwa Jung, Jeong‐Min Kim, Matthew Chung, H D Jang, Mi-Sook Kim, Eung-Joon Lee, Wookjin Yang, Seung-Hoon Lee
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims Gastrointestinal (GI) surgery can alter GI anatomy and physiology, potentially affecting the effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Despite widespread use of DOACs in atrial fibrillation (AF), evidence comparing their effectiveness and safety in patients with prior GI surgery is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the comparative risk–benefit profiles of DOACs in this population. Methods Using a nationwide Korean claims database, this observational cohort study included patients with AF prescribed a DOAC (dabigatran, apixaban, edoxaban, or rivaroxaban) after GI surgery between 2014 and 2021. Risks of clinical outcomes including ischemic stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding, and their composites were evaluated. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to adjust for confounding. Results A total of 8,047 patients (mean age, 73.7 years; 34.3% male) were analyzed. Dabigatran was associated with a higher risk of ischemic stroke/systemic embolism than apixaban (hazard ratio [HR], 1.66; 95% CI, 1.01–2.73). Rivaroxaban was associated with increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) compared with apixaban (HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.02–2.98) and edoxaban (HR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.25–4.69). The risks of GI bleeding, overall major bleeding, and composite outcomes were broadly comparable across DOACs. Subgroup analyses across key covariates did not reveal any significant effect modifications. Conclusions In patients with AF and prior GI surgery, dabigatran was associated with greater thromboembolic risk and rivaroxaban with higher ICH risk compared with other DOACs. DOAC selection in this setting should account for drug-specific risk–benefit profiles in conjunction with individual patient’s thromboembolic and bleeding risks. Conflict of interest Jiyeon Ha : Nothing to disclose. Wookjin Yang: Nothing to disclose. Mi-Sook Kim: Nothing to disclose. Eung-Joon Lee: Nothing to disclose. Matthew Chung: Nothing to disclose. Boyeon Yang: Nothing to disclose. Hyemin Jang: Nothing to disclose. Jeong-Min Kim: Nothing to disclose. Keun-Hwa Jung: Nothing to disclose. Seung-Hoon Lee : Nothing to disclose. Figure 1 - belongs to Conclusions

European Stroke JournalVol. 11(Supplement_1)
Asan Medical Center (KR), Seoul National University Hospital (KR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.