Tree‐based modelling of ecosystem services and climate‐adaptive silviculture strategies

Abstract Climate change‐driven disturbances are producing shifts in forest composition and productivity, which may reduce biodiversity as well as threaten the economic security and safety of nearby communities. Adaptive management is a potential solution for maintaining forest resources. We examine the effectiveness of adaptive management in boreal forests of Alaska, where the climate is warming rapidly and fire activity is increasing dramatically. We interviewed stakeholders and managers of the Tanana Valley State Forest (TVSF) of Alaska to elicit probable adaptive management actions. We then implemented these management strategies in an ecological process model to quantify the impacts of climate change and adaptive forest management on future availability of natural resources and ecosystem services. We found climate change may drive substantial decreases in both carbon sequestration (up to 28%) and high‐value timber (up to 43%) as well as shifts in wildlife habitat. At the landscape scale, low‐intensity management in every scenario currently under consideration may be insufficient to moderate climate impacts. However, specific fuel treatments could reduce the risk of intense fire at the local level for up to 22 years and may be targeted to protect valuable resources. Synthesis and applications . Our years‐long collaboration contributed to a robust scientific basis for the next TVSF management plan, which is currently under development. More broadly, our findings demonstrate the adaptive capacity of communities in sparsely managed climate vulnerable forests is likely insufficient to offset declines in desired ecosystem services. Community protection depends on effective climate change mitigation to reduce risks of fire and drought stress‐induced tree mortality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Ecology
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.70404
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tree‐based modelling of ecosystem services and climate‐adaptive silviculture strategies

Scott Goetz, David Lutz, Shelby Sundquist, Adrianna Foster
Journal of Applied Ecology
Fire effects on ecosystems
article

Tree‐based modelling of ecosystem services and climate‐adaptive silviculture strategies

Scott Goetz, David Lutz, Shelby Sundquist, Adrianna Foster
article en

Abstract

Abstract Climate change‐driven disturbances are producing shifts in forest composition and productivity, which may reduce biodiversity as well as threaten the economic security and safety of nearby communities. Adaptive management is a potential solution for maintaining forest resources. We examine the effectiveness of adaptive management in boreal forests of Alaska, where the climate is warming rapidly and fire activity is increasing dramatically. We interviewed stakeholders and managers of the Tanana Valley State Forest (TVSF) of Alaska to elicit probable adaptive management actions. We then implemented these management strategies in an ecological process model to quantify the impacts of climate change and adaptive forest management on future availability of natural resources and ecosystem services. We found climate change may drive substantial decreases in both carbon sequestration (up to 28%) and high‐value timber (up to 43%) as well as shifts in wildlife habitat. At the landscape scale, low‐intensity management in every scenario currently under consideration may be insufficient to moderate climate impacts. However, specific fuel treatments could reduce the risk of intense fire at the local level for up to 22 years and may be targeted to protect valuable resources. Synthesis and applications . Our years‐long collaboration contributed to a robust scientific basis for the next TVSF management plan, which is currently under development. More broadly, our findings demonstrate the adaptive capacity of communities in sparsely managed climate vulnerable forests is likely insufficient to offset declines in desired ecosystem services. Community protection depends on effective climate change mitigation to reduce risks of fire and drought stress‐induced tree mortality.

Journal of Applied EcologyVol. 63(5)
Dartmouth College (US), NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US), Northern Arizona University (US), Colby–Sawyer College (US), NSF NCAR Climate and Global Dynamics Laboratory (US)
Science Mission Directorate
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Fire effects on ecosystems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.