Follow the data: tracking data quality and completeness in oncology real-world data

Objectives: Electronic Health Record (EHR) data are increasingly used in cancer research, yet the fidelity of this data when exchanged between systems remains poorly quantified. This study investigated the agreement in essential biomarker data after they are passed from the EHR into the cancer registry and Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) extracts. Materials and Methods: This single-institution retrospective study compared demographics and 6 biomarkers from 30 lung cancer patients seen between July 2020 and July 2022. Manual review from the EHR served as the gold standard, with concordance tested between the source EHR, Institutional Cancer Registry, and FHIR exports. Results: Demographics showed high concordance across databases. In contrast, biomarker data present in the source EHR were missing in 80%-100% of FHIR extracts. The demographic registry variables were highly concordant. Discussion: This study reports a significant loss in biomarker data availability across real-world data (RWD) sources. Results underscore critical gaps in RWD extraction or exchange methods and highlight risks of relying on RWD without validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMIA Open
Published
2026-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooag052
Primary Topic
Data Quality and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Follow the data: tracking data quality and completeness in oncology real-world data

Muhammad Shaalan Beg, Ümit Topaloĝlu, Murat Sincan, Inez Inman et al.
JAMIA Open
Data Quality and Management
article

Follow the data: tracking data quality and completeness in oncology real-world data

Muhammad Shaalan Beg, Ümit Topaloĝlu, Murat Sincan, Inez Inman, Shannon Silkensen, Anne-Marie Meyer, Cody Hudson, Samantha J App, R Hannes Niedner
article en

Abstract

Objectives: Electronic Health Record (EHR) data are increasingly used in cancer research, yet the fidelity of this data when exchanged between systems remains poorly quantified. This study investigated the agreement in essential biomarker data after they are passed from the EHR into the cancer registry and Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) extracts. Materials and Methods: This single-institution retrospective study compared demographics and 6 biomarkers from 30 lung cancer patients seen between July 2020 and July 2022. Manual review from the EHR served as the gold standard, with concordance tested between the source EHR, Institutional Cancer Registry, and FHIR exports. Results: Demographics showed high concordance across databases. In contrast, biomarker data present in the source EHR were missing in 80%-100% of FHIR extracts. The demographic registry variables were highly concordant. Discussion: This study reports a significant loss in biomarker data availability across real-world data (RWD) sources. Results underscore critical gaps in RWD extraction or exchange methods and highlight risks of relying on RWD without validation.

JAMIA OpenVol. 9(3)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Leidos (United States) (US), Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist (US), University of South Dakota (US), Oceanside Public Library (US), National Cancer Institute (US), Wake Forest University (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
National Cancer Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Data Quality and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.