ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026LT81 VALIDATION OF A TRUSTWORTHY AI-BASED CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR PREDICTING PATIENT OUTCOME IN ACUTE STROKE TREATMENT (VALIDATE)
Abstract Background and aims Artificial intelligence(AI)-based clinical decision support systems(CDSS) can rapidly analyze patient data to support clinical decision-making. Although acute ischemic stroke(AIS) reperfusion treatments benefits are established, using individualized outcome predictions for hyperacute treatment decisions remains challenging. We aimed to test the VALIDATE-CDSS providing real-time, individualized outcome predictions to support treatment selection in AIS. Methods Prospective non-interventional time-motion study of consecutive AIS at three tertiary centers. A shadow researcher collected real-time data via mobile application; clinicians remainded blinded to predictions. For each patient, 3 outcome predictions were locally generated:clinical data alone, +non-contrast CT, and +CT angiography. The system predicts 3-month modified Rankin Scale(mRS) for four treatments: intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), mechanical thrombectomy(EVT), combined IVT+EVT, or no reperfusion(NoREP). Primary outcome: feasibility and usability of VALIDATE-CDSS in real-world hyperacute stroke care. Secondary outcomes: predictive accuracy, treatment concordance, and performance across subgroups. Results 290 AIS patients (53% men, median NIHSS 4[1-12]) were enrolled over 17 months, representing 38% of eligible office-hour strokes. Treatments received: 16.2% IVT, 21.4% EVT, 15.5% both, 46.9% NoREP. All patients had ≥1 prediction; 62.2% had all three. VALIDATE-CDSS achieved excellent System Usability Scale score (82.1/100). However, challenges emerged regarding real-time integration, moderate clinician confidence in predictions, and visualization comprehension. In 28% of cases, neurologists agreed with predictions; only 9% would have changed treatment according to results. Secondary outcomes are being analyzed now. Conclusions AI-based CDSS application in hyperacute stroke is feasible, achieving excellent usability despite challenges in real-time integration and user confidence. Conflict of interest
Authors
- Adam Hilbert (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3447-5453)
- Victòria Sala
- Dietmar Frey (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5407-2331)
- Ingo Werren
- Mercedes Ayesta
- Marta Rubiera
- Thi Nguyet Nguyen
- Luis Lopez-Ramos
- Martin Bendszus (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9094-6769)
- Ronen R Leker
Institutions
- Heidelberg University (DE)
- Hadassah Medical Center (IL)
- Ibero-American Institute (DE)
- University Hospital Heidelberg (DE)
- University Medical Center (US)
- Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (ES)
- Technological University Dublin (IE)
- Simula Metropolitan Center for Digital Engineering (NO)
- Median SCP (Spain) (ES)
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- European Stroke Journal
- Published
- 2026-05-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.1959
- Primary Topic
- Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00