ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1115 SWANSEA STROKE SCALE- A VALIDATED CLINICAL SCALE FOR USE BY MULTI-DISCIPLINARY STAFF IN ACUTE STROKE

Abstract Background and aims In the United Kingdom, there is shortage of Stroke specialists. Multi-disciplinary teams (health care support workers, physician associates, resident doctors and stroke nurses) increasingly deliver post-stroke care. Neurological decline in acute phase could be missed due to lack of simple neurological examination. We developed the Swansea Stroke Scale (SSS), a tool similar to the Glasgow Coma Scale, but specific to stroke for this staff cohort. The SSS evaluates 5 constructs- Situation, Sight, Speech, Oral intake and Movement. Scores range from 5 (no deficits) to 20 (maximal deficits). This study validates the SSS against the specialist-led National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Methods Approved by the Research Ethics committee, study recruited 135 stroke survivors, over 18 years, in acute stroke unit with symptom onset <7 days. Convergent validity evaluated with paired assessments of SSS and NIHSS on Day 1; preadmission modified Rankin score (mRS) used for divergent validity. Two non-specialists on Day 2 evaluated inter-rater agreement via independent SSS assessments. 30 days outcome used for predictive validity. Results Pearson’s Correlation 0.924 (p<0.001, 95% CI 0.895-0.945) between SSS and NIHSS indicates strong convergent validity. Divergent validity was confirmed by low correlation with pre-admission mRS (r=0.18, p=0.037). Intraclass correlation of 0.99 (p<0.001, 95% CI 0.987-0.993) between two assessors showed excellent inter-rater agreement. SSS is statistically significant (F 18.71, p<0.001) for 30 day disposition. Conclusions The new stroke scale for non-specialists revealed strong validity and reliability against NIHSS by specialists, has good 30-day outcome prediction with wider implications in areas deficient of stroke specialists. Conflict of interest M Krishnan: nothing to disclose. W Y Cheung: nothing to disclose. S Storton: nothing to disclose. S Winsor: nothing to disclose. R Rai: nothing to disclose. G Edwards: nothing to disclose. E Evans: nothing to disclose. H Breeze-Jones: nothing to disclose. S C Bain: nothing to disclose. R A Thomas: nothing to disclose

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Stroke Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.1488
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1115 SWANSEA STROKE SCALE- A VALIDATED CLINICAL SCALE FOR USE BY MULTI-DISCIPLINARY STAFF IN ACUTE STROKE

Manju Krishnan, Hannah Breeze-Jones, Steffanie Winsor, Wai-Yee Cheung et al.
European Stroke Journal
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1115 SWANSEA STROKE SCALE- A VALIDATED CLINICAL SCALE FOR USE BY MULTI-DISCIPLINARY STAFF IN ACUTE STROKE

Manju Krishnan, Hannah Breeze-Jones, Steffanie Winsor, Wai-Yee Cheung, Elin Evans, Sharon Storton, Roderick Thomas, Gareth Edwards, Rosika Rai, Stephen Bain
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims In the United Kingdom, there is shortage of Stroke specialists. Multi-disciplinary teams (health care support workers, physician associates, resident doctors and stroke nurses) increasingly deliver post-stroke care. Neurological decline in acute phase could be missed due to lack of simple neurological examination. We developed the Swansea Stroke Scale (SSS), a tool similar to the Glasgow Coma Scale, but specific to stroke for this staff cohort. The SSS evaluates 5 constructs- Situation, Sight, Speech, Oral intake and Movement. Scores range from 5 (no deficits) to 20 (maximal deficits). This study validates the SSS against the specialist-led National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Methods Approved by the Research Ethics committee, study recruited 135 stroke survivors, over 18 years, in acute stroke unit with symptom onset <7 days. Convergent validity evaluated with paired assessments of SSS and NIHSS on Day 1; preadmission modified Rankin score (mRS) used for divergent validity. Two non-specialists on Day 2 evaluated inter-rater agreement via independent SSS assessments. 30 days outcome used for predictive validity. Results Pearson’s Correlation 0.924 (p<0.001, 95% CI 0.895-0.945) between SSS and NIHSS indicates strong convergent validity. Divergent validity was confirmed by low correlation with pre-admission mRS (r=0.18, p=0.037). Intraclass correlation of 0.99 (p<0.001, 95% CI 0.987-0.993) between two assessors showed excellent inter-rater agreement. SSS is statistically significant (F 18.71, p<0.001) for 30 day disposition. Conclusions The new stroke scale for non-specialists revealed strong validity and reliability against NIHSS by specialists, has good 30-day outcome prediction with wider implications in areas deficient of stroke specialists. Conflict of interest M Krishnan: nothing to disclose. W Y Cheung: nothing to disclose. S Storton: nothing to disclose. S Winsor: nothing to disclose. R Rai: nothing to disclose. G Edwards: nothing to disclose. E Evans: nothing to disclose. H Breeze-Jones: nothing to disclose. S C Bain: nothing to disclose. R A Thomas: nothing to disclose

European Stroke JournalVol. 11(Supplement_1)
Swansea Bay University Health Board (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.