ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A2237 DOOR-IN DOOR-OUT TIMES PRIOR TO TRANSFER FOR MECHANICAL THROMBECTOMY, A SINGLE-CENTER OBSERVATIONAL STUDY (DIDO-MT)

Abstract Background and aims In acute stroke, every 30-minute delay increases disability and three-month mortality by 20%. In France, 60% of severe strokes require transfer to another hospital for mechanical thrombectomy (MT). The “Door-in Door-out” (DIDO) interval - time spent in the first hospital - should be under 90 minutes according to French HAS 2025 guidelines, or under 120 minutes according to US recommendations. This interval remains insufficiently documented. This study aimed to describe DIDO performance in a French hospital and identify factors associated with prolonged delays. Methods We conducted a retrospective single-center observational study including patients initially managed at Meaux City Hospital, then transferred to Rothschild Foundation Hospital, Paris for MT between January 2021 and December 2024. Data were extracted from electronic medical records and analyzed descriptively. Factors associated with prolonged DIDO (≥120 minutes) were assessed using univariate analysis. Results Among 184 identified patients, 99 were included due to missing departure-time data. The median DIDO was 120 minutes [96–156], with 30 minutes from arrival to imaging and 90 minutes from imaging to departure. Only daytime arrival (8:00–20:00) was significantly associated with a DIDO <120 minutes. No association was found with medical history, NIHSS score, or intravenous thrombolysis. Nineteen percent of patients met the French recommended target (<90 minutes). Conclusions DIDO performance was substantially above recommended thresholds. Evening admissions and delays between imaging and departure were major contributors. Improved documentation, optimized post-imaging workflows, and strengthened off-hours staffing may help reduce DIDO times. Conflict of interest Boursin: nothing to disclose. Bonnerave: nothing to disclose. Ameri: : nothing to disclose. Saintonge: nothing to disclose. Seners: nothing to disclose. Mazighi: nothing to disclose.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Stroke Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.1773
Primary Topic
Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A2237 DOOR-IN DOOR-OUT TIMES PRIOR TO TRANSFER FOR MECHANICAL THROMBECTOMY, A SINGLE-CENTER OBSERVATIONAL STUDY (DIDO-MT)

Alain Améri, Rémi Bonnerave, Stéphane Saintonge, Mikael Mazighi et al.
European Stroke Journal
Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A2237 DOOR-IN DOOR-OUT TIMES PRIOR TO TRANSFER FOR MECHANICAL THROMBECTOMY, A SINGLE-CENTER OBSERVATIONAL STUDY (DIDO-MT)

Alain Améri, Rémi Bonnerave, Stéphane Saintonge, Mikael Mazighi, Perrine Boursin, Seners Pierre
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims In acute stroke, every 30-minute delay increases disability and three-month mortality by 20%. In France, 60% of severe strokes require transfer to another hospital for mechanical thrombectomy (MT). The “Door-in Door-out” (DIDO) interval - time spent in the first hospital - should be under 90 minutes according to French HAS 2025 guidelines, or under 120 minutes according to US recommendations. This interval remains insufficiently documented. This study aimed to describe DIDO performance in a French hospital and identify factors associated with prolonged delays. Methods We conducted a retrospective single-center observational study including patients initially managed at Meaux City Hospital, then transferred to Rothschild Foundation Hospital, Paris for MT between January 2021 and December 2024. Data were extracted from electronic medical records and analyzed descriptively. Factors associated with prolonged DIDO (≥120 minutes) were assessed using univariate analysis. Results Among 184 identified patients, 99 were included due to missing departure-time data. The median DIDO was 120 minutes [96–156], with 30 minutes from arrival to imaging and 90 minutes from imaging to departure. Only daytime arrival (8:00–20:00) was significantly associated with a DIDO <120 minutes. No association was found with medical history, NIHSS score, or intravenous thrombolysis. Nineteen percent of patients met the French recommended target (<90 minutes). Conclusions DIDO performance was substantially above recommended thresholds. Evening admissions and delays between imaging and departure were major contributors. Improved documentation, optimized post-imaging workflows, and strengthened off-hours staffing may help reduce DIDO times. Conflict of interest Boursin: nothing to disclose. Bonnerave: nothing to disclose. Ameri: : nothing to disclose. Saintonge: nothing to disclose. Seners: nothing to disclose. Mazighi: nothing to disclose.

European Stroke JournalVol. 11(Supplement_1)
Inserm (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR), Stroke Association (GB), Sorbonne Université (FR), Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Hôpital Lariboisière (FR), Fondation de Rothschild (FR), Paris Cardiovascular Research Center (FR), FHU Neurovasc (FR), MESA Hospital (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.