ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1479 INFARCT CORE GROWTH RATE PREDICTS OUTCOME IN INTRACRANIAL ATHEROSCLEROTIC DISEASE

Abstract Background and aims Large vessel occlusion (LVO) acute ischemic stroke due to intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) may experience better clinical outcomes compared to non-ICAD-LVO patients. This study aimed to assess the impact of core growth rate (CGR) on the relationship between ICAD and stroke outcomes. Methods We analysed LVO patients who received endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) from the International Stroke Perfusion Imaging Registry (INSPIRE). ICAD was defined by the presence of residual stenosis in the target intracranial artery following successful EVT. CGR was calculated as acute core volume divided by the time from stroke onset to CT Perfusion, dichotomised into slow-CGR (≤5mL/hr) vs. non-slow-CGR (>5mL/hr). Causal mediation analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between CGR and ICAD on poor outcomes (mRS 5–6 at 3-month). Results 1056 patients were included: 247 ICAD and 809 non-ICAD. The ICAD group had a lower rate of poor outcomes (17% vs. 32%, p<0.001), and a higher prevalence of slow-CGR (78% vs. 47%, p<0.001) compared to non-ICAD group. Mediation analysis revealed that ICAD decreased the probability of poor outcome by 15% (unadjusted), with slow-CGR accounting for 34% of this total effect. After adjusting for age, sex, baseline-NIHSS, ICA-occlusion, collateral, hypertension, diabetes, and thrombolysis, ICAD still reduced the probability of poor outcome by 13% (total effect=-0.13, 95% CI[-0.20, -0.07], p<0.001), with slow-CGR mediating 27% of this effect (natural-indirect-effect=-0.04, 95% CI[-0.7, -0.01], p=0.023). Conclusions ICAD patients have slower core growth rate and better outcomes. Slow-CGR is a key mechanism accounting for better outcomes in ICAD patients. Conflict of interest Yueming Wang, Chushuang Chen, Mark William Parsons, Carlos Garcia-Esperon, Gang Li, Jian Wu, and Longting Lin: nothing to disclose.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Stroke Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.713
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1479 INFARCT CORE GROWTH RATE PREDICTS OUTCOME IN INTRACRANIAL ATHEROSCLEROTIC DISEASE

Chushuang Chen, Yuxing Wang, Mark Parsons, Gang Li et al.
European Stroke Journal
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1479 INFARCT CORE GROWTH RATE PREDICTS OUTCOME IN INTRACRANIAL ATHEROSCLEROTIC DISEASE

Chushuang Chen, Yuxing Wang, Mark Parsons, Gang Li, Jian Wu, Carlos Garcia-Esperon, Longting Lin
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims Large vessel occlusion (LVO) acute ischemic stroke due to intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) may experience better clinical outcomes compared to non-ICAD-LVO patients. This study aimed to assess the impact of core growth rate (CGR) on the relationship between ICAD and stroke outcomes. Methods We analysed LVO patients who received endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) from the International Stroke Perfusion Imaging Registry (INSPIRE). ICAD was defined by the presence of residual stenosis in the target intracranial artery following successful EVT. CGR was calculated as acute core volume divided by the time from stroke onset to CT Perfusion, dichotomised into slow-CGR (≤5mL/hr) vs. non-slow-CGR (>5mL/hr). Causal mediation analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between CGR and ICAD on poor outcomes (mRS 5–6 at 3-month). Results 1056 patients were included: 247 ICAD and 809 non-ICAD. The ICAD group had a lower rate of poor outcomes (17% vs. 32%, p<0.001), and a higher prevalence of slow-CGR (78% vs. 47%, p<0.001) compared to non-ICAD group. Mediation analysis revealed that ICAD decreased the probability of poor outcome by 15% (unadjusted), with slow-CGR accounting for 34% of this total effect. After adjusting for age, sex, baseline-NIHSS, ICA-occlusion, collateral, hypertension, diabetes, and thrombolysis, ICAD still reduced the probability of poor outcome by 13% (total effect=-0.13, 95% CI[-0.20, -0.07], p<0.001), with slow-CGR mediating 27% of this effect (natural-indirect-effect=-0.04, 95% CI[-0.7, -0.01], p=0.023). Conclusions ICAD patients have slower core growth rate and better outcomes. Slow-CGR is a key mechanism accounting for better outcomes in ICAD patients. Conflict of interest Yueming Wang, Chushuang Chen, Mark William Parsons, Carlos Garcia-Esperon, Gang Li, Jian Wu, and Longting Lin: nothing to disclose.

European Stroke JournalVol. 11(Supplement_1)
University of Liverpool (GB), John Hunter Hospital (AU), Liverpool College (GB), Shanghai East Hospital (CN), Ingham Institute (AU), Beijing Tsinghua Chang Gung Hospital (CN), Tsinghua University (CN)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.