ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A854 THE OPTIMAL TIMING FOR SURGERY IN INTRACRANIAL HEMORRHAGE: A CAUSE-SPECIFIC SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND NETWORK META-ANALYSIS

Abstract Background and aims Intracranial hemorrhage (ICrH) is a serious neurosurgical emergency with high mortality and morbidity. The best time for surgery is a crucial management problem. Various studies show inconsistent findings for mortality, functional recovery, and complications from ultra-early (<6 hours) to delayed (>7 days) surgery. This network meta-analysis aimed to determine the etiology-specific optimal surgical time for ICrH to guide evidence-based clinical decision-making. Methods A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, WOS, and the Cochrane Library was performed. Twenty-eight studies involving 5,919 participants were included. Data were analyzed using random-effects models in R software, with subgroup analyses based on the time windows and type of hemorrhage. Results Surgery conducted within 24 hours markedly decreased the likelihood of unfavorable GOS ratings (OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.31–0.92) and rebleeding (OR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.37–0.80). The network meta-analysis demonstrated that surgery within 48 hours is the most effective optimal period for decreasing mortality (P-score = 0.99). Nonetheless, paired comparisons indicated non-significant effects (OR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.51–1.72), suggesting that there must be etiology-specific interpretation. Early intervention (≤72 hours) proved most advantageous in aSAH, while ultra-early surgery (<6 hours) in traumatic ICH resulted in increased mortality. Postponement of surgery beyond seven days led to inferior functional recovery. Conclusions Early surgical intervention, especially within 24–48 hours, improves prognosis in many ICH cases. The optimal timing depends on the bleeding type. These findings resolve past disagreements by showing that timing and pathology affect therapy outcomes. More tailored scheduling and high-quality RCTs are needed to improve clinical guidelines. Conflict of interest Nada Mostafa Al-dardery: nothing to disclose. Dina Essam Abo-elnour: nothing to disclose. Alyaa Khaled Madech: nothing to disclose. Shahd Alqato: nothing to disclose. Suhel F. Batarsch: nothing to disclose. Mariam A. Abusalah: nothing to disclose. Amr Diaaeldin Sayed Mahmoud: nothing to disclose. Wesal Nasr Mahmoud: nothing to disclose. Abdulrhman M Khaity: nothing to disclose.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Stroke Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.1432
Primary Topic
Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A854 THE OPTIMAL TIMING FOR SURGERY IN INTRACRANIAL HEMORRHAGE: A CAUSE-SPECIFIC SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND NETWORK META-ANALYSIS

Dina Essam Abo‐elnour, Amr Mahmoud, Mariam Abusalah, Suhel Batarseh et al.
European Stroke Journal
Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A854 THE OPTIMAL TIMING FOR SURGERY IN INTRACRANIAL HEMORRHAGE: A CAUSE-SPECIFIC SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND NETWORK META-ANALYSIS

Dina Essam Abo‐elnour, Amr Mahmoud, Mariam Abusalah, Suhel Batarseh, Wesal Mahmoud, Shahd Alqato, Abdulrhman Khaity, Nada Al-Dardery, Alyaa Madeeh
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims Intracranial hemorrhage (ICrH) is a serious neurosurgical emergency with high mortality and morbidity. The best time for surgery is a crucial management problem. Various studies show inconsistent findings for mortality, functional recovery, and complications from ultra-early (<6 hours) to delayed (>7 days) surgery. This network meta-analysis aimed to determine the etiology-specific optimal surgical time for ICrH to guide evidence-based clinical decision-making. Methods A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, WOS, and the Cochrane Library was performed. Twenty-eight studies involving 5,919 participants were included. Data were analyzed using random-effects models in R software, with subgroup analyses based on the time windows and type of hemorrhage. Results Surgery conducted within 24 hours markedly decreased the likelihood of unfavorable GOS ratings (OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.31–0.92) and rebleeding (OR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.37–0.80). The network meta-analysis demonstrated that surgery within 48 hours is the most effective optimal period for decreasing mortality (P-score = 0.99). Nonetheless, paired comparisons indicated non-significant effects (OR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.51–1.72), suggesting that there must be etiology-specific interpretation. Early intervention (≤72 hours) proved most advantageous in aSAH, while ultra-early surgery (<6 hours) in traumatic ICH resulted in increased mortality. Postponement of surgery beyond seven days led to inferior functional recovery. Conclusions Early surgical intervention, especially within 24–48 hours, improves prognosis in many ICH cases. The optimal timing depends on the bleeding type. These findings resolve past disagreements by showing that timing and pathology affect therapy outcomes. More tailored scheduling and high-quality RCTs are needed to improve clinical guidelines. Conflict of interest Nada Mostafa Al-dardery: nothing to disclose. Dina Essam Abo-elnour: nothing to disclose. Alyaa Khaled Madech: nothing to disclose. Shahd Alqato: nothing to disclose. Suhel F. Batarsch: nothing to disclose. Mariam A. Abusalah: nothing to disclose. Amr Diaaeldin Sayed Mahmoud: nothing to disclose. Wesal Nasr Mahmoud: nothing to disclose. Abdulrhman M Khaity: nothing to disclose.

European Stroke JournalVol. 11(Supplement_1)
Al-Azhar University – Gaza (PS), University of Khartoum (SD), Jordan University of Science and Technology (JO), Zagazig University (EG), Jordan Hospital (JO), Fayoum University (EG)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.