ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A2019 AUTOMATED CAROTID WEB DETECTION USING NN-UNET: VALIDATION ON THE MR CLEAN REGISTRY

Abstract Background and aims A carotid web (CaWeb) is a shelf-like fibrous lesion at the carotid bulb that may cause ischemic stroke. CaWeb prevalence in stroke patients is estimated at 0.5-1%, but it is likely higher due to limited awareness and its occurrence in younger individuals. A nn-UNet model (Kuang et al., jnis-2024-021782), a deep learning-based segmentation model, achieved 92% accuracy (AUC=0.92) on 58 CaWeb cases, but lacked validation on an external dataset. This study validates the CaWeb detection model on the MR CLEAN registry (2014-2018). Methods We validated the model on 613 randomly selected CTA scans from acute ischemic stroke patients, including all 32 CaWeb-positive cases. The model segments lumen and possible CaWeb. Diagnostic performance was assessed with Receiver-Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis. Two volume thresholds were determined: one via Youden's index (maximizing sensitivity-specificity balance) and one enforcing minimum specificity of 75% (while maintaining practical thresholds). Performance was evaluated on cropped scans (3cm around carotid bifurcation), approximating original training conditions. Results ROC analysis (AUC=0.65) yielded thresholds of 6mm3 (Youden's index) and 9mm3 (75% specificity). At 6mm3, accuracy was 72% (sensitivity 72%, specificity 72%, F1 score 21%). At 9mm3, accuracy was 77% (sensitivity 68%, specificity 77%, F1 score 24%). Conclusions The model’s accuracy in this validation study was 77% (AUC=0.65), whereas the accuracy of the original model was 92% (AUC=0.92). The low F1 score reflects the severe class imbalance. Future work will finetune the model on this diverse dataset to improve generalizability and reliability of CaWeb detection in patients with stroke. Conflict of interest All authors: Nothing to disclose Figure 1 - belongs to Conclusions

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Stroke Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.943
Primary Topic
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A2019 AUTOMATED CAROTID WEB DETECTION USING NN-UNET: VALIDATION ON THE MR CLEAN REGISTRY

Ruisheng Su, Jonathan Coutinho, Charles Majoie, Frank Te Nijenhuis et al.
European Stroke Journal
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A2019 AUTOMATED CAROTID WEB DETECTION USING NN-UNET: VALIDATION ON THE MR CLEAN REGISTRY

Ruisheng Su, Jonathan Coutinho, Charles Majoie, Frank Te Nijenhuis, Diederik Dippel, Maureen Boor, Theo van Walsum, Cailean Weber
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims A carotid web (CaWeb) is a shelf-like fibrous lesion at the carotid bulb that may cause ischemic stroke. CaWeb prevalence in stroke patients is estimated at 0.5-1%, but it is likely higher due to limited awareness and its occurrence in younger individuals. A nn-UNet model (Kuang et al., jnis-2024-021782), a deep learning-based segmentation model, achieved 92% accuracy (AUC=0.92) on 58 CaWeb cases, but lacked validation on an external dataset. This study validates the CaWeb detection model on the MR CLEAN registry (2014-2018). Methods We validated the model on 613 randomly selected CTA scans from acute ischemic stroke patients, including all 32 CaWeb-positive cases. The model segments lumen and possible CaWeb. Diagnostic performance was assessed with Receiver-Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis. Two volume thresholds were determined: one via Youden's index (maximizing sensitivity-specificity balance) and one enforcing minimum specificity of 75% (while maintaining practical thresholds). Performance was evaluated on cropped scans (3cm around carotid bifurcation), approximating original training conditions. Results ROC analysis (AUC=0.65) yielded thresholds of 6mm3 (Youden's index) and 9mm3 (75% specificity). At 6mm3, accuracy was 72% (sensitivity 72%, specificity 72%, F1 score 21%). At 9mm3, accuracy was 77% (sensitivity 68%, specificity 77%, F1 score 24%). Conclusions The model’s accuracy in this validation study was 77% (AUC=0.65), whereas the accuracy of the original model was 92% (AUC=0.92). The low F1 score reflects the severe class imbalance. Future work will finetune the model on this diverse dataset to improve generalizability and reliability of CaWeb detection in patients with stroke. Conflict of interest All authors: Nothing to disclose Figure 1 - belongs to Conclusions

European Stroke JournalVol. 11(Supplement_1)
Erasmus MC (NL), Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL), Eindhoven University of Technology (NL), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.