ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A2214 COMBINING A LARGE LANGUAGE MODEL WITH TRADITIONAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING TOOLS FOR AUTOMATED RES-Q REGISTRY VARIABLE EXTRACTION

Abstract Background and aims Despite substantial advances in digital health data infrastructure, quality improvement efforts still rely on resource-intensive manual data collection. Using a combination of a large language model (LLM) and conventional programming tools, we developed and evaluated the accuracy of a pilot algorithm that enables automated data extraction of the international Registry of Stroke Care Quality (RES-Q) variables. Methods We created a reference dataset containing 198 variables for 100 ischemic stroke cases, manually extracted from the electronic health records (overall 13,872 data points), taking an average of 20 minutes per patient. In automated extraction, 126 variables were extracted using conventional software engineering, and 72 using LLM. The accuracy of categorical variables was compared using Cohen’s κ, numeric variables using Spearman’s correlation, and free-text variables were assessed descriptively. Results The accuracy of the current version of the pilot algorithm was 89.2%, compared to the ground-truth dataset. Discrepancies included 457 (3.3%) missing and 1,042 (7.5%) incorrect values. 60 variables, including age, sex, prestroke modified Rankin scale score, index thrombectomy, mTICI score, puncture and reperfusion timestamps, showed Cohen’s κ score of 1.0 or Spearman’s coefficient of 1.0 (Figure 1). Overall, estimated programming time was 416 hours, and 19 algorithm iterations were performed using 5-30 patients’ data in each iteration. 1.2% of values were found to be incorrectly entered manually into the reference dataset. Conclusions Automated tools can potentially improve stroke registry data collection efficiency by reducing data extraction time, with accuracy for some variables comparable to or better than trained staff. Further improvements in the algorithm are anticipated. Conflict of interest “All authors: nothing to disclose” Figure 1 - belongs to Results

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Stroke Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.1020
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A2214 COMBINING A LARGE LANGUAGE MODEL WITH TRADITIONAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING TOOLS FOR AUTOMATED RES-Q REGISTRY VARIABLE EXTRACTION

Agnė Ulytė, Rytis Masiliūnas, Robert Mikulík, Andrius Maslovas et al.
European Stroke Journal
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A2214 COMBINING A LARGE LANGUAGE MODEL WITH TRADITIONAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING TOOLS FOR AUTOMATED RES-Q REGISTRY VARIABLE EXTRACTION

Agnė Ulytė, Rytis Masiliūnas, Robert Mikulík, Andrius Maslovas, Rytis Klimovič, Dalius Jatuzis, Gertrūda Kaubrytė
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims Despite substantial advances in digital health data infrastructure, quality improvement efforts still rely on resource-intensive manual data collection. Using a combination of a large language model (LLM) and conventional programming tools, we developed and evaluated the accuracy of a pilot algorithm that enables automated data extraction of the international Registry of Stroke Care Quality (RES-Q) variables. Methods We created a reference dataset containing 198 variables for 100 ischemic stroke cases, manually extracted from the electronic health records (overall 13,872 data points), taking an average of 20 minutes per patient. In automated extraction, 126 variables were extracted using conventional software engineering, and 72 using LLM. The accuracy of categorical variables was compared using Cohen’s κ, numeric variables using Spearman’s correlation, and free-text variables were assessed descriptively. Results The accuracy of the current version of the pilot algorithm was 89.2%, compared to the ground-truth dataset. Discrepancies included 457 (3.3%) missing and 1,042 (7.5%) incorrect values. 60 variables, including age, sex, prestroke modified Rankin scale score, index thrombectomy, mTICI score, puncture and reperfusion timestamps, showed Cohen’s κ score of 1.0 or Spearman’s coefficient of 1.0 (Figure 1). Overall, estimated programming time was 416 hours, and 19 algorithm iterations were performed using 5-30 patients’ data in each iteration. 1.2% of values were found to be incorrectly entered manually into the reference dataset. Conclusions Automated tools can potentially improve stroke registry data collection efficiency by reducing data extraction time, with accuracy for some variables comparable to or better than trained staff. Further improvements in the algorithm are anticipated. Conflict of interest “All authors: nothing to disclose” Figure 1 - belongs to Results

European Stroke JournalVol. 11(Supplement_1)
Vilnius University (LT), Krajská nemocnice T. Bati (CZ), Vilnius University Hospital Santariskiu Klinikos (LT)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.