ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026OT176 EFFECT OF WEARABLE SENSORS ON PATIENT ENGAGEMENT AND MOTIVATION IN POST-STROKE REHABILITATION (SENSOR-S): AN ONGOING RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Abstract Background and aims Patient-related factors, including engagement and motivation have an important effect on outcomes after stroke rehabilitation. Wearable devices allow objective and continuous monitoring of health-related parameters and behavior. The effect of wearables on patient engagement are unclear. Methods We aim to investigate the effect of wearable devices on patient engagement and motivation during early stroke rehabilitation. Further, we assess the potential of wearable devices to quantify the changes in neurological function and identify potential markers for complications in early stroke rehabilitation. Results In the SENSOR-S Study, patients with stroke (modified Rankin Scale <5) are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the intervention or control group during in-patient rehabilitation. The intervention group receives a set of wearables including a smartwatch, smartphone, and a continuous glucose monitoring for a two-week period monitoring patient’s health-related parameters and behavior. Inertial-measurement-units are used to record gait. The collected data are delivered to patients through a mobile application as daily and weekly reports, complemented by health-related reminders and motivational prompts. The control group receives usual care. Study visits are performed before and after the intervention. Based on the sample size calculation, 156 patients were required. Conclusions Primary outcome is the change in patient engagement assessed using the Patient Activity Measure (PAM-13) at the end of the intervention period compared to baseline. Secondary outcomes include change in functional outcome and subjective quality of life. Conflict of interest

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Stroke Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.2049
Primary Topic
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026OT176 EFFECT OF WEARABLE SENSORS ON PATIENT ENGAGEMENT AND MOTIVATION IN POST-STROKE REHABILITATION (SENSOR-S): AN ONGOING RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

M Endres, Alexander H. Nave, Nurcennet Kaynak, Valentin Kennel et al.
European Stroke Journal
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026OT176 EFFECT OF WEARABLE SENSORS ON PATIENT ENGAGEMENT AND MOTIVATION IN POST-STROKE REHABILITATION (SENSOR-S): AN ONGOING RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

M Endres, Alexander H. Nave, Nurcennet Kaynak, Valentin Kennel, Anne Leopold, Fatemeh Sardadvar, Athina Tome, Heinrich Audebert, Felix Schmidt, Annemarie Uhlig, Bert Arnrich
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims Patient-related factors, including engagement and motivation have an important effect on outcomes after stroke rehabilitation. Wearable devices allow objective and continuous monitoring of health-related parameters and behavior. The effect of wearables on patient engagement are unclear. Methods We aim to investigate the effect of wearable devices on patient engagement and motivation during early stroke rehabilitation. Further, we assess the potential of wearable devices to quantify the changes in neurological function and identify potential markers for complications in early stroke rehabilitation. Results In the SENSOR-S Study, patients with stroke (modified Rankin Scale <5) are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the intervention or control group during in-patient rehabilitation. The intervention group receives a set of wearables including a smartwatch, smartphone, and a continuous glucose monitoring for a two-week period monitoring patient’s health-related parameters and behavior. Inertial-measurement-units are used to record gait. The collected data are delivered to patients through a mobile application as daily and weekly reports, complemented by health-related reminders and motivational prompts. The control group receives usual care. Study visits are performed before and after the intervention. Based on the sample size calculation, 156 patients were required. Conclusions Primary outcome is the change in patient engagement assessed using the Patient Activity Measure (PAM-13) at the end of the intervention period compared to baseline. Secondary outcomes include change in functional outcome and subjective quality of life. Conflict of interest

European Stroke JournalVol. 11(Supplement_1)
Hasso Plattner Institute (DE), University of Potsdam (DE), Universitätsklinikum Brandenburg an der Havel (DE), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.