Assessing the benefits of using plane wave compounding when estimating backscatter coefficients with an <i>in situ</i> bead as a calibration target

Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) techniques provide tissue characterization and have applications in precision diagnostics and therapy monitoring. A common QUS approach estimates backscatter coefficients (BSCs) using the external reference phantom method, which does not adequately address attenuation and transmission losses. To address this issue, we previously utilized a 2 mm titanium bead as an in situ calibration reference with conventional focused wave (FW) imaging. Plane wave compounding (PWC), which transmits multiple angled plane waves, enables rapid image acquisition while maintaining quality, making it widely useful in Doppler and elastographic imaging. However, its role in BSC estimation with an in situ bead had not been investigated. We hypothesized that PWC would outperform FW, as diffraction effects vary more slowly away from the bead depth when using PWC. We tested this hypothesis by comparing BSC estimation in phantoms and in vivo rabbit mammary tumors. Results indicated that PWC with in situ calibration better compensated for attenuation loss and reduced variability in scatterer property estimates compared to FW. Specifically, the scatterer diameter variance was 15.2 μm2 when using PWC versus 45.4 μm2 when using FW where the focus was offset from the bead depth. These findings demonstrate the superiority of using PWC with an in situ calibration target for accurate, efficient BSC estimation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0043333
Primary Topic
Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the benefits of using plane wave compounding when estimating backscatter coefficients with an in situ bead as a calibration target

Yuning Zhao, Zhengchang Kou, Rita J. Miller, Mingrui Liu et al.
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
article

Assessing the benefits of using plane wave compounding when estimating backscatter coefficients with an in situ bead as a calibration target

Yuning Zhao, Zhengchang Kou, Rita J. Miller, Mingrui Liu, Gregory J. Czarnota, Michael L. Oelze
article en

Abstract

Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) techniques provide tissue characterization and have applications in precision diagnostics and therapy monitoring. A common QUS approach estimates backscatter coefficients (BSCs) using the external reference phantom method, which does not adequately address attenuation and transmission losses. To address this issue, we previously utilized a 2 mm titanium bead as an in situ calibration reference with conventional focused wave (FW) imaging. Plane wave compounding (PWC), which transmits multiple angled plane waves, enables rapid image acquisition while maintaining quality, making it widely useful in Doppler and elastographic imaging. However, its role in BSC estimation with an in situ bead had not been investigated. We hypothesized that PWC would outperform FW, as diffraction effects vary more slowly away from the bead depth when using PWC. We tested this hypothesis by comparing BSC estimation in phantoms and in vivo rabbit mammary tumors. Results indicated that PWC with in situ calibration better compensated for attenuation loss and reduced variability in scatterer property estimates compared to FW. Specifically, the scatterer diameter variance was 15.2 μm2 when using PWC versus 45.4 μm2 when using FW where the focus was offset from the bead depth. These findings demonstrate the superiority of using PWC with an in situ calibration target for accurate, efficient BSC estimation.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaVol. 159(5)
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Illinois College (US), University of Toronto (CA)
Foundation for the National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.