ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A2428 IMPACT OF IMPLEMENTING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-SUPPORTED LARGE VESSEL OCCLUSION DETECTION ON STROKE WORKFLOW: A PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER OBSERVATIONAL PILOT STUDY

Abstract Background and aims Timely diagnosis and endovascular treatment (EVT) are crucial for favorable outcomes in acute ischemic stroke. In regions with long distances and variable access to neurointerventional expertise workflow delays remain a challenge. Artificial intelligence (AI) based large vessel occlusion (LVO) detection on CT angiography may support and streamline workflows, reduce delays, and support equitable care. We evaluated the impact of implementing an AI-based stroke imaging support system on workflow metrics and clinical outcomes within a regional stroke network. Methods In this prospective, observational multicenter pilot study, EVT-treated patients from one comprehensive stroke center and affiliated hospitals in South-Eastern Norway were included. Patients were grouped as pre-AI (n=90), post-AI without AI use (n=80), and post-AI with active AI use (n=30). The primary endpoint was time from local CT acquisition to CSC contact. Secondary endpoints included CT-to-CSC arrival, CT-to-groin puncture, CSC arrival-to-groin puncture, and functional independence (modified Rankin Scale 0–2) at 90 days. Results Median CT-to-CSC contact times were 24, 29, and 22 minutes in the three groups (global p=0.039), with no significant adjusted pairwise differences. CT-to-groin puncture time was shorter in the AI-used group (152 minutes) compared with both pre-AI (179 minutes) and post-AI without use (182 minutes) (adjusted p=0.045 and p=0.007). Functional outcomes at 90 days did not differ between groups. Conclusions AI-based stroke imaging support was associated with modest workflow improvements but no measurable effect on functional outcome. Limited uptake and lack of automated alerting likely reduced impact, highlighting the importance of full clinical workflow integration. Conflict of interest Linn Heitmann: nothing to disclose

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Stroke Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.1108
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A2428 IMPACT OF IMPLEMENTING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-SUPPORTED LARGE VESSEL OCCLUSION DETECTION ON STROKE WORKFLOW: A PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER OBSERVATIONAL PILOT STUDY

Anne Hege Aamodt, Thor Håkon Skattør, Brian Anthony Enriquez, Linn Heitmann
European Stroke Journal
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A2428 IMPACT OF IMPLEMENTING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-SUPPORTED LARGE VESSEL OCCLUSION DETECTION ON STROKE WORKFLOW: A PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER OBSERVATIONAL PILOT STUDY

Anne Hege Aamodt, Thor Håkon Skattør, Brian Anthony Enriquez, Linn Heitmann
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims Timely diagnosis and endovascular treatment (EVT) are crucial for favorable outcomes in acute ischemic stroke. In regions with long distances and variable access to neurointerventional expertise workflow delays remain a challenge. Artificial intelligence (AI) based large vessel occlusion (LVO) detection on CT angiography may support and streamline workflows, reduce delays, and support equitable care. We evaluated the impact of implementing an AI-based stroke imaging support system on workflow metrics and clinical outcomes within a regional stroke network. Methods In this prospective, observational multicenter pilot study, EVT-treated patients from one comprehensive stroke center and affiliated hospitals in South-Eastern Norway were included. Patients were grouped as pre-AI (n=90), post-AI without AI use (n=80), and post-AI with active AI use (n=30). The primary endpoint was time from local CT acquisition to CSC contact. Secondary endpoints included CT-to-CSC arrival, CT-to-groin puncture, CSC arrival-to-groin puncture, and functional independence (modified Rankin Scale 0–2) at 90 days. Results Median CT-to-CSC contact times were 24, 29, and 22 minutes in the three groups (global p=0.039), with no significant adjusted pairwise differences. CT-to-groin puncture time was shorter in the AI-used group (152 minutes) compared with both pre-AI (179 minutes) and post-AI without use (182 minutes) (adjusted p=0.045 and p=0.007). Functional outcomes at 90 days did not differ between groups. Conclusions AI-based stroke imaging support was associated with modest workflow improvements but no measurable effect on functional outcome. Limited uptake and lack of automated alerting likely reduced impact, highlighting the importance of full clinical workflow integration. Conflict of interest Linn Heitmann: nothing to disclose

European Stroke JournalVol. 11(Supplement_1)
Oslo University Hospital (NO), Barnes Hospital (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.