Sustained Attention Instability as a Cognitive Biomarker in Chronic Spine Pain: A 90‐second Visual Attention Test
BACKGROUND: Chronic spine pain is linked to self-reported cognitive complaints. However, objective markers are lacking. The 90-s Continuous Visual Attention Test (CVAT) quantifies key attention subdomains: reaction time (RT, alertness), RT variability (VRT, sustained attention), omission errors (focused attention) and commission errors (impulsivity). OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify which specific attentional subdomains, measured by the CVAT, are impaired in adults with chronic spine pain. METHODS: This prospective case-control study included 84 adults with chronic lumbar/cervical pain (≥ 3 months) and 118 healthy controls. A MANCOVA tested group differences on CVAT variables, controlling for age and sex, followed by Bonferroni-corrected ANCOVAs. To isolate cognitive variability from general processing speed, the coefficient of variability (VRT/RT) was also analysed. Logistic regression assessed the predictive power of CVAT indices for pain status. RESULTS: (1) = 130.55, p < 0.001; 82.7% accuracy). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with chronic spine pain demonstrate attentional deficits, with sustained attention instability (VRT and VRT/RT) as the most robust marker. The CVAT detects this impairment, offering a practical tool for clinical assessment to inform treatment and monitor cognitive function in pain management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III (prospective case-control). SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: A brief, 90-s computerized attention test provides an objective, clinic-ready screen for sustained-attention instability in spine pain patients. Identifying cognitive vulnerability at the point of care can inform perioperative counselling, driving/work-safety guidance and rehabilitation planning, and it may help monitor treatment response alongside pain metrics, offering a noninvasive, nonpharmacologic complement to standard pain assessment.
Authors
- Rossano Kepler Alvim Fiorelli (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5236-0903)
- Eelco van Duinkerken (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0558-9435)
- Kenneth Blum (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6727-803X)
- Colin Hanna
- Emmanouil Liodakis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8870-6216)
- Sergio L. Schmidt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7654-5507)
- Thomas Lundquist
- Mark Gold
- Morgan Lorio
- Andreza P. Maia
- Guilherme J. Schmidt
- Carolina Abramovicz
- Kai‐Uwe Lewandrowski
- Juliana J. Schmidt
- Alexander P. L. Lewandrowski
Institutions
- Brigham Young University (US)
- University of Southern California (US)
- University of Arizona (US)
- Palo Alto University (US)
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Alabama College of Osteopathic Medicine (US)
- BG Klinik Tübingen (DE)
- Hospital Universitário Gaffrée e Guinle (BR)
- Center for Personalized Cancer Treatment (NL)
- Desert Institute For Spine Care (US)
- Jacobs Institute (US)
- Fundación Universitaria Sanitas (CO)
- Case Western Reserve University (US)
- University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
- Western University of Health Sciences (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- European Journal of Pain
- Published
- 2026-05-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.70289
- Primary Topic
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00