ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A218 STRUCTURAL CONFOUNDING EXPLAINS MOST HETEROGENEITY IN LATE-WINDOW REPERFUSION TRIALS: A NETWORK META-EPIDEMIOLOGIC ANALYSIS OF 14 RANDOMIZED STUDIES

Abstract Background and aims Late-window reperfusion trials (>4.5 hours) show substantial variation in imaging criteria, infarct severity, and workflow, complicating indirect comparisons across thrombectomy, thrombolysis, and best medical therapy. We aim to quantify structural sources of heterogeneity to interpret treatment contrast betwwen trials. Methods Using a PROSPERO-registered protocol, we identified 14 randomized trials (n = 4,384) enrolling adults 4.5–24 hours from last-known-well using imaging-based selection. Random-effects pairwise and network meta-analyses estimated odds ratios (ORs) with between-study τ2 and I2. Results EVT significantly improved functional independence versus BMT (OR 3.14, 95% CI 1.82–5.41; τ2 = 0.366; I2 = 76.9%). Mortality was likewise reduced (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.67–1.00). Meta-regression identified baseline ASPECTS as the dominant ecological modifier, explaining 75.5% of EVT-BMT heterogeneity (R2 = 0.755). Each +1-point increase in ASPECTS corresponded to a 14-18% relative attenuation of the EVT effect (slope range –0.15 to –0.20; p values 0.008–0.035). Bridging-thrombolysis proportion varied markedly across regions (~5% in North America vs 20-30% in Europe/China; χ2 = 35.0; p < 0.0001). Bridging was strongly correlated with faster workflow (β = –20.2 minutes per 1.0 unit increase; R2 = 0.95; p = 0.0002), explained only 11% of between-trial heterogeneity in EVT effect size (β = –1.90; p = 0.31). Conclusions In late-window stroke, EVT consistently confers benefit, but cross-trial variation primarily reflects structural confounding rather than biological treatment differences. Harmonizing imaging thresholds and workflow metrics is essential for generating reliable comparative evidence for late-window reperfusion strategies. Conflict of interest Hung Phan Huu, MS-5: Nothing to disclose. Han Hong Huynh, MD: Nothing to disclose. Dang Nguyen, MD: Nothing to disclose. Nghia Nguyen Phu, MD: Nothing to disclose. Linh Nguyen Ngoc Yen, MSc-2: Nothing to disclose. Khoa Ngoc-Dang Tran, MD: Nothing to disclose. Uyen Dang, MD: Nothing to disclose. Tam Quoc Minh Tran, MD: Nothing to disclose. Chau Dang, MD: Nothing to disclose. Wei Jun Lee, MD: Nothing to disclose. Tuan Vinh, BA: Nothing to disclose. Thu Huynh Minh Le, PharmD: Nothing to disclose. Nhi Huu Hanh Le, MD: Nothing to disclose. Hoai Huu Le, MD: Nothing to disclose. Huyen Le, MD: Nothing to disclose. Lam Duc Chau, BA: Nothing to disclose. Uyen Do, MD: Nothing to disclose. Minh Le, MD, PhD: Nothing to disclose. Thach Nguyen, MD: Nothing to disclose.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Stroke Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.222
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A218 STRUCTURAL CONFOUNDING EXPLAINS MOST HETEROGENEITY IN LATE-WINDOW REPERFUSION TRIALS: A NETWORK META-EPIDEMIOLOGIC ANALYSIS OF 14 RANDOMIZED STUDIES

Wei Jun Lee, Chau Dang, Dang Nguyen, Hung Phan Huu et al.
European Stroke Journal
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A218 STRUCTURAL CONFOUNDING EXPLAINS MOST HETEROGENEITY IN LATE-WINDOW REPERFUSION TRIALS: A NETWORK META-EPIDEMIOLOGIC ANALYSIS OF 14 RANDOMIZED STUDIES

Wei Jun Lee, Chau Dang, Dang Nguyen, Hung Phan Huu, Uyên Đặng, T U O N G Nguyen, Lam Duc Chau, U. Do, Huyen Le, Hoai Huu Le, Minh Le, Thu Huynh Minh Le, Han Hong Huynh, Nghia Nguyen Phu, Tuan Vinh, Nhi Huu Hanh Le, Khoa Ngoc-Dang Tran, Tam Quoc Minh Tran, Linh Nguyen Ngoc Yen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims Late-window reperfusion trials (>4.5 hours) show substantial variation in imaging criteria, infarct severity, and workflow, complicating indirect comparisons across thrombectomy, thrombolysis, and best medical therapy. We aim to quantify structural sources of heterogeneity to interpret treatment contrast betwwen trials. Methods Using a PROSPERO-registered protocol, we identified 14 randomized trials (n = 4,384) enrolling adults 4.5–24 hours from last-known-well using imaging-based selection. Random-effects pairwise and network meta-analyses estimated odds ratios (ORs) with between-study τ2 and I2. Results EVT significantly improved functional independence versus BMT (OR 3.14, 95% CI 1.82–5.41; τ2 = 0.366; I2 = 76.9%). Mortality was likewise reduced (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.67–1.00). Meta-regression identified baseline ASPECTS as the dominant ecological modifier, explaining 75.5% of EVT-BMT heterogeneity (R2 = 0.755). Each +1-point increase in ASPECTS corresponded to a 14-18% relative attenuation of the EVT effect (slope range –0.15 to –0.20; p values 0.008–0.035). Bridging-thrombolysis proportion varied markedly across regions (~5% in North America vs 20-30% in Europe/China; χ2 = 35.0; p < 0.0001). Bridging was strongly correlated with faster workflow (β = –20.2 minutes per 1.0 unit increase; R2 = 0.95; p = 0.0002), explained only 11% of between-trial heterogeneity in EVT effect size (β = –1.90; p = 0.31). Conclusions In late-window stroke, EVT consistently confers benefit, but cross-trial variation primarily reflects structural confounding rather than biological treatment differences. Harmonizing imaging thresholds and workflow metrics is essential for generating reliable comparative evidence for late-window reperfusion strategies. Conflict of interest Hung Phan Huu, MS-5: Nothing to disclose. Han Hong Huynh, MD: Nothing to disclose. Dang Nguyen, MD: Nothing to disclose. Nghia Nguyen Phu, MD: Nothing to disclose. Linh Nguyen Ngoc Yen, MSc-2: Nothing to disclose. Khoa Ngoc-Dang Tran, MD: Nothing to disclose. Uyen Dang, MD: Nothing to disclose. Tam Quoc Minh Tran, MD: Nothing to disclose. Chau Dang, MD: Nothing to disclose. Wei Jun Lee, MD: Nothing to disclose. Tuan Vinh, BA: Nothing to disclose. Thu Huynh Minh Le, PharmD: Nothing to disclose. Nhi Huu Hanh Le, MD: Nothing to disclose. Hoai Huu Le, MD: Nothing to disclose. Huyen Le, MD: Nothing to disclose. Lam Duc Chau, BA: Nothing to disclose. Uyen Do, MD: Nothing to disclose. Minh Le, MD, PhD: Nothing to disclose. Thach Nguyen, MD: Nothing to disclose.

European Stroke JournalVol. 11(Supplement_1)
Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US), Harvard University (US), Can Tho University (VN), St. Mary Medical Center (US), San Joaquin General Hospital (US), University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City (VN), St. Elizabeth's Medical Center (US), University of Oxford (GB), Methodist Hospital (US), Science Oxford (GB), Taipei Medical University (TW), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US), Milliken & Company (United States) (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.