ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A2291 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE INTERNATIONAL PHYSICAL ACTIVITY QUESTIONNAIRE SHORT FORM AND ACCELEROMETER-MEASURED PHYSICAL ACTIVITY AND SEDENTARY TIME IN CHRONIC STROKE SURVIVORS

Abstract Background and aims The International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Form (IPAQ-SF) and ActiGraph accelerometers are widely used and internationally recommended for assessing physical activity (PA) and sedentary time (ST) after stroke. However, their agreement on chronic stroke survivors remains unclear, which is crucial to avoid misinforming clinical and research monitoring. This study quantifies the agreement between IPAQ-SF and ActiGraph measurements of PA and ST and compares agreement across different epoch lengths. Methods Fifty community-dwelling chronic stroke survivors with independent walking wore an ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometer for seven consecutive days and completed the IPAQ-SF on the following day. Agreement between IPAQ-SF and accelerometer-derived weekly moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA), moderate PA (MPA), and ST was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis. Agreement was compared across four epoch lengths (1-, 10-, 15-, 60-second). Results For MVPA, the geometric mean ratio was 1.02 (95%CI: 0.49 to 2.1; limits of agreement (LoA): 0.007 to 154.6), with a proportional bias (β=0.832, p=0.001). For MPA, the geometric mean ratio was 0.91 (95%CI: 0.45 to 1.87; LoA: 0.0066 to 127.6), with a proportional bias (β=0.793, p=0.003). For ST, the geometric mean ratio was 0.85 (95%CI: 0.78 to 0.92; LoA: 0.47 to 1.53), with a proportional bias (β=0.773, p<0.001). Agreement was higher with 60-second epochs. Conclusions IPAQ-SF overestimated MVPA and MPA, and underestimated ST compared to the accelerometer, with wide limits of agreement across outcomes. Proportional bias suggests that discrepancies increase at higher magnitudes. IPAQ-SF and accelerometer data are not interchangeable for assessment of PA and ST in chronic stroke survivors. Conflict of interest Teresa Dias: nothing to disclose; Carla Pareira: nothing to disclose; Fernando Ribeiro: nothing to disclose.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Stroke Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.1054
Primary Topic
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A2291 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE INTERNATIONAL PHYSICAL ACTIVITY QUESTIONNAIRE SHORT FORM AND ACCELEROMETER-MEASURED PHYSICAL ACTIVITY AND SEDENTARY TIME IN CHRONIC STROKE SURVIVORS

C Pereira, Fernando Ribeiro, Teresa Dias
European Stroke Journal
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A2291 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE INTERNATIONAL PHYSICAL ACTIVITY QUESTIONNAIRE SHORT FORM AND ACCELEROMETER-MEASURED PHYSICAL ACTIVITY AND SEDENTARY TIME IN CHRONIC STROKE SURVIVORS

C Pereira, Fernando Ribeiro, Teresa Dias
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims The International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Form (IPAQ-SF) and ActiGraph accelerometers are widely used and internationally recommended for assessing physical activity (PA) and sedentary time (ST) after stroke. However, their agreement on chronic stroke survivors remains unclear, which is crucial to avoid misinforming clinical and research monitoring. This study quantifies the agreement between IPAQ-SF and ActiGraph measurements of PA and ST and compares agreement across different epoch lengths. Methods Fifty community-dwelling chronic stroke survivors with independent walking wore an ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometer for seven consecutive days and completed the IPAQ-SF on the following day. Agreement between IPAQ-SF and accelerometer-derived weekly moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA), moderate PA (MPA), and ST was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis. Agreement was compared across four epoch lengths (1-, 10-, 15-, 60-second). Results For MVPA, the geometric mean ratio was 1.02 (95%CI: 0.49 to 2.1; limits of agreement (LoA): 0.007 to 154.6), with a proportional bias (β=0.832, p=0.001). For MPA, the geometric mean ratio was 0.91 (95%CI: 0.45 to 1.87; LoA: 0.0066 to 127.6), with a proportional bias (β=0.793, p=0.003). For ST, the geometric mean ratio was 0.85 (95%CI: 0.78 to 0.92; LoA: 0.47 to 1.53), with a proportional bias (β=0.773, p<0.001). Agreement was higher with 60-second epochs. Conclusions IPAQ-SF overestimated MVPA and MPA, and underestimated ST compared to the accelerometer, with wide limits of agreement across outcomes. Proportional bias suggests that discrepancies increase at higher magnitudes. IPAQ-SF and accelerometer data are not interchangeable for assessment of PA and ST in chronic stroke survivors. Conflict of interest Teresa Dias: nothing to disclose; Carla Pareira: nothing to disclose; Fernando Ribeiro: nothing to disclose.

European Stroke JournalVol. 11(Supplement_1)
Universidade Politécnica de Setúbal (PT), Institute for Biomedicine (IT), University of Aveiro (PT), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.