ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A2321 ARE WE ADDRESSING THE WRONG PEOPLE? A POST-HOC ANALYSIS FROM THE STROCARE TRIAL OF A CROSS-SECTORAL, COORDINATED AFTERCARE PROGRAM FOR STROKE PATIENTS IN GERMANY

Abstract Background and aims Despite numerous trials, the optimal design of stroke aftercare programs remains unclear. The StroCare trial evaluated a structured, transitional and follow-up care program to improve health-related quality of life (HRQoL) up to 2 years after stroke but found no overall intervention effect. This post-hoc analysis explored whether treatment effects differed across patient characteristics. Methods At 12 and 24 months we fitted timepoint-specific linear regression models for PROMIS-10 Global Physical Health T-scores including interaction terms between treatment group and covariates prespecified in the main analysis. Interactions were examined individually and jointly in the intention-to-treat population using multiple imputation with pooled estimates for missing data, analogous to the main analysis. Results Pre-existing care level was strongly associated with worse HRQoL at 12 (ß=-3.8; p<0.0001) and 24 months (ß=-3.8; p<0.0001). Single-interaction models indicated a stronger attenuation of this negative association in the intervention group at 12 months (group x care level ß=2.4; p=0.03) and a similarly directed but weaker trend at 24 months (ß=2.0; p=0.066). In the full interaction model, this interaction was weaker (12 months: ß=2.2; p=0.058; 24 months: ß=1.7; p=0.13). No other covariates showed relevant effect moderation. Conclusions Given the post-hoc design and small proportion of patients with higher care levels in the study population, these results should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating. However, they suggest that structured aftercare programs may confer greater benefit in more dependent stroke survivors, a subpopulation underrepresented in aftercare trials. We therefore deem the targeted evaluation of such programs in this subpopulation in future trials warranted. Conflict of interest Bourry, Rafael: Nothing to disclose; Petter, Jonas: Nothing to disclose; Schrage, Theresa: Nothing to disclose; Molder, Janina: Nothing to disclose; Boskamp, Stefan: Nothing to disclose; Härter, Martin: Sourced funding with the Innovation Fund of the German Federal Joint Committee; Rosenkranz, Michael: Nothing to disclose; Schmidt, Holger: Nothing to disclose; Beisel, Andreas: Nothing to Disclose; Dams, Judith: Nothing to Disclose; König, Hans-Helmut: Nothing to disclose; Kriston, Levente: Sourced funding with the Innovation Fund of the German Federal Joint Committee; Thomalla, Götz: Sourced funding with the Innovation Fund of the German Federal Joint Committee

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Stroke Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.1066
Primary Topic
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A2321 ARE WE ADDRESSING THE WRONG PEOPLE? A POST-HOC ANALYSIS FROM THE STROCARE TRIAL OF A CROSS-SECTORAL, COORDINATED AFTERCARE PROGRAM FOR STROKE PATIENTS IN GERMANY

Stefan Boskamp, Rafael Bourry, Michael Rosenkranz, Theresa Schrage et al.
European Stroke Journal
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A2321 ARE WE ADDRESSING THE WRONG PEOPLE? A POST-HOC ANALYSIS FROM THE STROCARE TRIAL OF A CROSS-SECTORAL, COORDINATED AFTERCARE PROGRAM FOR STROKE PATIENTS IN GERMANY

Stefan Boskamp, Rafael Bourry, Michael Rosenkranz, Theresa Schrage, Judith Dams, Levente Kriston, Holger Schmidt, Martin Härter, Andreas Beisel, Hans-Helmut König, Götz Thomalla, Janina Molder, Jonas Petter
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims Despite numerous trials, the optimal design of stroke aftercare programs remains unclear. The StroCare trial evaluated a structured, transitional and follow-up care program to improve health-related quality of life (HRQoL) up to 2 years after stroke but found no overall intervention effect. This post-hoc analysis explored whether treatment effects differed across patient characteristics. Methods At 12 and 24 months we fitted timepoint-specific linear regression models for PROMIS-10 Global Physical Health T-scores including interaction terms between treatment group and covariates prespecified in the main analysis. Interactions were examined individually and jointly in the intention-to-treat population using multiple imputation with pooled estimates for missing data, analogous to the main analysis. Results Pre-existing care level was strongly associated with worse HRQoL at 12 (ß=-3.8; p<0.0001) and 24 months (ß=-3.8; p<0.0001). Single-interaction models indicated a stronger attenuation of this negative association in the intervention group at 12 months (group x care level ß=2.4; p=0.03) and a similarly directed but weaker trend at 24 months (ß=2.0; p=0.066). In the full interaction model, this interaction was weaker (12 months: ß=2.2; p=0.058; 24 months: ß=1.7; p=0.13). No other covariates showed relevant effect moderation. Conclusions Given the post-hoc design and small proportion of patients with higher care levels in the study population, these results should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating. However, they suggest that structured aftercare programs may confer greater benefit in more dependent stroke survivors, a subpopulation underrepresented in aftercare trials. We therefore deem the targeted evaluation of such programs in this subpopulation in future trials warranted. Conflict of interest Bourry, Rafael: Nothing to disclose; Petter, Jonas: Nothing to disclose; Schrage, Theresa: Nothing to disclose; Molder, Janina: Nothing to disclose; Boskamp, Stefan: Nothing to disclose; Härter, Martin: Sourced funding with the Innovation Fund of the German Federal Joint Committee; Rosenkranz, Michael: Nothing to disclose; Schmidt, Holger: Nothing to disclose; Beisel, Andreas: Nothing to Disclose; Dams, Judith: Nothing to Disclose; König, Hans-Helmut: Nothing to disclose; Kriston, Levente: Sourced funding with the Innovation Fund of the German Federal Joint Committee; Thomalla, Götz: Sourced funding with the Innovation Fund of the German Federal Joint Committee

European Stroke JournalVol. 11(Supplement_1)
Universität Hamburg (DE), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE), Albertinen Diakoniewerk (DE), Elbe Kliniken Stade-Buxtehude (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.