ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1952 UNDERSTANDING WHAT WE SHOULD MEASURE IN FACIAL PALSY AFTER STROKE AND HOW TO MEASURE IT: TOWARDS A CORE OUTCOME SET FOR POST-STROKE FACIAL PALSY

Abstract Background and aims Health professionals previously identified three outcome domains for a Core Outcome Set (COS) for post-stroke facial palsy for research and clinical practice: 1) facial movement and sensation, 2) everyday functions, and 3) living with facial palsy. We aim to examine what measurement instruments existed, their quality of evidence and their fit to the COS domains. Methods We systematically searched key electronic databases from the earliest date to October 2025. Measurement instruments, psychometric data and clinical utility were examined. We used a matrix to map instruments to COS domains, considering evidence quality. Results Evidence quality was generally low to moderate, very low or unknown. Only two clinician-rated scales had psychometric evaluation in post-stroke facial palsy: the Sunnybrook Facial Grading Scale (SFGS) and House-Brackmann Grading System (HBGS), with low-to-moderate and very-low quality evidence, respectively. These two could be used for facial movement and sensation, but do not measure everyday functions or living with facial palsy. Clinically, both scales require brief training, single-clinician administration, take a few minutes, need no special equipment, and are free to use. Conclusions SFGS and HBGS have limited psychometric evidence but could still be used to measure some elements of this core outcome set; however, further validation is needed in stroke. Currently, there is a need for suitable measurement instruments to cover everyday functions and the psychological impact of living with facial palsy. As we develop this work further with lived-experience stakeholders, we will consider what other measurement instruments are needed. Conflict of interest Havva Sumeyye Eroglu: nothing to disclose, Audrey Bowen: nothing to disclose, Matthew Checketts: nothing to disclose, Claire Mitchell: nothing to disclose

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Stroke Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.1690
Primary Topic
Facial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1952 UNDERSTANDING WHAT WE SHOULD MEASURE IN FACIAL PALSY AFTER STROKE AND HOW TO MEASURE IT: TOWARDS A CORE OUTCOME SET FOR POST-STROKE FACIAL PALSY

Matthew Checketts, Havva Eroglu, Audrey Bowen, Claire Mitchell
European Stroke Journal
Facial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1952 UNDERSTANDING WHAT WE SHOULD MEASURE IN FACIAL PALSY AFTER STROKE AND HOW TO MEASURE IT: TOWARDS A CORE OUTCOME SET FOR POST-STROKE FACIAL PALSY

Matthew Checketts, Havva Eroglu, Audrey Bowen, Claire Mitchell
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims Health professionals previously identified three outcome domains for a Core Outcome Set (COS) for post-stroke facial palsy for research and clinical practice: 1) facial movement and sensation, 2) everyday functions, and 3) living with facial palsy. We aim to examine what measurement instruments existed, their quality of evidence and their fit to the COS domains. Methods We systematically searched key electronic databases from the earliest date to October 2025. Measurement instruments, psychometric data and clinical utility were examined. We used a matrix to map instruments to COS domains, considering evidence quality. Results Evidence quality was generally low to moderate, very low or unknown. Only two clinician-rated scales had psychometric evaluation in post-stroke facial palsy: the Sunnybrook Facial Grading Scale (SFGS) and House-Brackmann Grading System (HBGS), with low-to-moderate and very-low quality evidence, respectively. These two could be used for facial movement and sensation, but do not measure everyday functions or living with facial palsy. Clinically, both scales require brief training, single-clinician administration, take a few minutes, need no special equipment, and are free to use. Conclusions SFGS and HBGS have limited psychometric evidence but could still be used to measure some elements of this core outcome set; however, further validation is needed in stroke. Currently, there is a need for suitable measurement instruments to cover everyday functions and the psychological impact of living with facial palsy. As we develop this work further with lived-experience stakeholders, we will consider what other measurement instruments are needed. Conflict of interest Havva Sumeyye Eroglu: nothing to disclose, Audrey Bowen: nothing to disclose, Matthew Checketts: nothing to disclose, Claire Mitchell: nothing to disclose

European Stroke JournalVol. 11(Supplement_1)
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB), University of Glasgow (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Facial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1952 UNDERSTANDING WHAT WE SHOULD MEASURE IN FACIAL PALSY AFTER STROKE AND HOW TO MEASURE IT: TOWARDS A CORE OUTCOME SET FOR POST-STROKE FACIAL PALSY — Matthew Checketts, Havva Eroglu, et al. · European Stroke Journal (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS