Self-regulating the use of large language models in clinical practice: a risk-stratified approach

The rapid integration of large language models (LLMs) into clinical practice offers promising benefits, including assistance with documentation, decision support and patient communication. However, these advantages are tempered by concerns around model accuracy, data privacy, clinician trust and regulatory responsibility. In this comment, we propose a clinician-led, risk-stratified framework to guide responsible adoption of LLMs in healthcare. The framework categorises applications into four risk tiers: low risk, moderate risk, high risk and critical risk. Each tier demands tailored oversight, validation and governance, with increasing levels of statutory regulatory scrutiny (eg., European Union Artificial Intelligence Act and U.S. Food and Drug Administration) and clinical supervision. We argue that proactive self-regulation combined with ongoing quality management and clinician education is essential to safely integrate LLMs into ongoing care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2025-101921
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Self-regulating the use of large language models in clinical practice: a risk-stratified approach

Milan Mohammad, Andreas Pihl, Espen Jimenez-Solem, Michael Hejmadi
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Self-regulating the use of large language models in clinical practice: a risk-stratified approach

Milan Mohammad, Andreas Pihl, Espen Jimenez-Solem, Michael Hejmadi
article en

Abstract

The rapid integration of large language models (LLMs) into clinical practice offers promising benefits, including assistance with documentation, decision support and patient communication. However, these advantages are tempered by concerns around model accuracy, data privacy, clinician trust and regulatory responsibility. In this comment, we propose a clinician-led, risk-stratified framework to guide responsible adoption of LLMs in healthcare. The framework categorises applications into four risk tiers: low risk, moderate risk, high risk and critical risk. Each tier demands tailored oversight, validation and governance, with increasing levels of statutory regulatory scrutiny (eg., European Union Artificial Intelligence Act and U.S. Food and Drug Administration) and clinical supervision. We argue that proactive self-regulation combined with ongoing quality management and clinician education is essential to safely integrate LLMs into ongoing care.

BMJ Health & Care InformaticsVol. 33(1)
University of Copenhagen (DK), University of Southern Denmark (DK), Frederiksberg Hospital (DK), Copenhagen University Hospital (DK), Rigshospitalet (DK), Zealand University Hospital (DK), Ferring Pharmaceuticals (Denmark) (DK), Roche (Denmark) (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Self-regulating the use of large language models in clinical practice: a risk-stratified approach — Milan Mohammad, Andreas Pihl, et al. · BMJ Health & Care Informatics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS