ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1287 EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF SUNLIGHT THERAPY IN STROKE PATIENTS –A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Abstract Background and aims Stroke rehabilitation is prolonged and resource-intensive, and accessible low-cost adjunctive therapies are limited. We evaluated whether adjunct natural sunlight exposure, compared with standard care alone, is safe and improves Stroke-Specific Quality of Life (SS-QoL) in patients with stroke Methods This prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint (PROBE) trial was conducted at a tertiary neuroscience centre in New Delhi (Nov 2023–Apr 2025). Adults aged 18–80 years with recent moderate stroke (NIHSS 5–15 or intracerebral haemorrhage volume <30 mL) within 4 weeks were randomized 1:1 to adjunct sunlight therapy plus standard care or standard care alone. The intervention comprised 30 minutes of outdoor sunlight exposure on alternate days for 15 days (target ~10,000–25,000 lux). Outcome assessors were blinded. The primary efficacy outcome was change in SS-QoL from baseline to second follow-up (~2 months). The primary safety outcome was treatment-related adverse events. Analyses followed intention-to-treat principles. Results Of 212 screened patients, 40 were randomized (20 per group). Baseline characteristics were comparable, although SS-QoL was lower in the sunlight group. SS-QoL improved more with adjunct sunlight therapy than standard care (median change +60.5 vs +26.0; between-group median difference −34.0, 95% CI −51.0 to −11.0; p=0.012), supported by mean change analysis (p=0.013). Improvement was also observed at first follow-up. No treatment-related adverse events occurred. Two deaths (one per group) were unrelated to the intervention. Conclusions Adjunct natural sunlight therapy was safe and associated with improved SS-QoL after stroke. Larger multicentre trials are warranted to confirm efficacy Conflict of interest Shivam Mirg: nothing to disclose

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Stroke Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.1538
Primary Topic
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1287 EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF SUNLIGHT THERAPY IN STROKE PATIENTS –A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Awadh Kishor Pandit, Garima Srivastava, Rohit Bhatia, Achal Kumar Srivastava et al.
European Stroke Journal
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1287 EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF SUNLIGHT THERAPY IN STROKE PATIENTS –A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Awadh Kishor Pandit, Garima Srivastava, Rohit Bhatia, Achal Kumar Srivastava, Shivam Mirg, Shivam Pandey, Poorvi Tangri, Rajesh Singh, Vishnu VY, Deepti Vibha
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims Stroke rehabilitation is prolonged and resource-intensive, and accessible low-cost adjunctive therapies are limited. We evaluated whether adjunct natural sunlight exposure, compared with standard care alone, is safe and improves Stroke-Specific Quality of Life (SS-QoL) in patients with stroke Methods This prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint (PROBE) trial was conducted at a tertiary neuroscience centre in New Delhi (Nov 2023–Apr 2025). Adults aged 18–80 years with recent moderate stroke (NIHSS 5–15 or intracerebral haemorrhage volume <30 mL) within 4 weeks were randomized 1:1 to adjunct sunlight therapy plus standard care or standard care alone. The intervention comprised 30 minutes of outdoor sunlight exposure on alternate days for 15 days (target ~10,000–25,000 lux). Outcome assessors were blinded. The primary efficacy outcome was change in SS-QoL from baseline to second follow-up (~2 months). The primary safety outcome was treatment-related adverse events. Analyses followed intention-to-treat principles. Results Of 212 screened patients, 40 were randomized (20 per group). Baseline characteristics were comparable, although SS-QoL was lower in the sunlight group. SS-QoL improved more with adjunct sunlight therapy than standard care (median change +60.5 vs +26.0; between-group median difference −34.0, 95% CI −51.0 to −11.0; p=0.012), supported by mean change analysis (p=0.013). Improvement was also observed at first follow-up. No treatment-related adverse events occurred. Two deaths (one per group) were unrelated to the intervention. Conclusions Adjunct natural sunlight therapy was safe and associated with improved SS-QoL after stroke. Larger multicentre trials are warranted to confirm efficacy Conflict of interest Shivam Mirg: nothing to disclose

European Stroke JournalVol. 11(Supplement_1)
All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.