ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1408 INTRAVENOUS TENECTEPLASE FOR LARGE-VESSEL OCCLUSION: META-ANALYSIS OF OUTCOMES WITH AND WITHOUT ACCESS TO THROMBECTOMY

Abstract Background and aims While Tenecteplase has seen expanding use in stroke thrombolysis, key questions such as the role of bridging therapy and extended-window use in large-vessel occlusion (LVO) patients with or without access to endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) remain unresolved. Methods We conducted a systematic review of randomized clinical trial (RCT) data involving LVO patients who were treated with or without Tenecteplase. Outcomes were stratified by EVT status, and further subgroup analysis based on treatment window (≤4.5 vs >4.5h) was conducted. Generalized odds ratios (gORs) were used to assess disability reduction by modified Rankin Scale (mRS) shift analysis. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CI were calculated for functional independence (mRS 0–2), excellent outcome (mRS 0–1), mortality, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Results Five studies (2,054 patients) were included. Tenecteplase was associated with greater disability reduction (gOR=1.19 [1.06–1.34]), more excellent outcome (RR=1.21 [1.06–1.38]) and functional independence (RR=1.14 [1.03–1.26]) compared to no thrombolysis. Rates of sICH (RR=1.46 [0.87–2.54]) and mortality (RR=1.07 [0.84–1.36]) were similar between groups. Before EVT, Tenecteplase within 4.5h was associated with greater disability reduction and higher functional independence compared with EVT alone; however, no benefit was observed beyond 4.5h in those undergoing EVT. Among LVO patients not treated with EVT but with salvageable tissue on CT perfusion, Tenecteplase administered after 4.5h was associated with improved functional outcomes. Conclusions Intravenous Tenecteplase was associated with improved outcomes when administered before EVT within 4.5h and in the extended window, guided by advanced neuroimaging, among selected patients who lacked access to EVT. Conflict of interest Fahad Alturki: Nothing to disclose, Ahmed Alkhiri: Nothing to disclose, Aser F. Alamri: Nothing to disclose, Remas M. Alonazi: Nothing to disclose, Thanh N. Nguyen: Nothing to disclose, Fahad S. Alajlan : Nothing to disclose, Adel Alhazzani: Nothing to disclose

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Stroke Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.677
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1408 INTRAVENOUS TENECTEPLASE FOR LARGE-VESSEL OCCLUSION: META-ANALYSIS OF OUTCOMES WITH AND WITHOUT ACCESS TO THROMBECTOMY

Fahad Alajlan, Ahmed Alkhiri, Fahad Alturki, Thanh N Nguyen et al.
European Stroke Journal
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1408 INTRAVENOUS TENECTEPLASE FOR LARGE-VESSEL OCCLUSION: META-ANALYSIS OF OUTCOMES WITH AND WITHOUT ACCESS TO THROMBECTOMY

Fahad Alajlan, Ahmed Alkhiri, Fahad Alturki, Thanh N Nguyen, Remas Alonazi, Aser Alamri, Adel Alhazzani
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims While Tenecteplase has seen expanding use in stroke thrombolysis, key questions such as the role of bridging therapy and extended-window use in large-vessel occlusion (LVO) patients with or without access to endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) remain unresolved. Methods We conducted a systematic review of randomized clinical trial (RCT) data involving LVO patients who were treated with or without Tenecteplase. Outcomes were stratified by EVT status, and further subgroup analysis based on treatment window (≤4.5 vs >4.5h) was conducted. Generalized odds ratios (gORs) were used to assess disability reduction by modified Rankin Scale (mRS) shift analysis. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CI were calculated for functional independence (mRS 0–2), excellent outcome (mRS 0–1), mortality, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Results Five studies (2,054 patients) were included. Tenecteplase was associated with greater disability reduction (gOR=1.19 [1.06–1.34]), more excellent outcome (RR=1.21 [1.06–1.38]) and functional independence (RR=1.14 [1.03–1.26]) compared to no thrombolysis. Rates of sICH (RR=1.46 [0.87–2.54]) and mortality (RR=1.07 [0.84–1.36]) were similar between groups. Before EVT, Tenecteplase within 4.5h was associated with greater disability reduction and higher functional independence compared with EVT alone; however, no benefit was observed beyond 4.5h in those undergoing EVT. Among LVO patients not treated with EVT but with salvageable tissue on CT perfusion, Tenecteplase administered after 4.5h was associated with improved functional outcomes. Conclusions Intravenous Tenecteplase was associated with improved outcomes when administered before EVT within 4.5h and in the extended window, guided by advanced neuroimaging, among selected patients who lacked access to EVT. Conflict of interest Fahad Alturki: Nothing to disclose, Ahmed Alkhiri: Nothing to disclose, Aser F. Alamri: Nothing to disclose, Remas M. Alonazi: Nothing to disclose, Thanh N. Nguyen: Nothing to disclose, Fahad S. Alajlan : Nothing to disclose, Adel Alhazzani: Nothing to disclose

European Stroke JournalVol. 11(Supplement_1)
Boston University (US), Alfaisal University (SA), Imam Mohammad ibn Saud Islamic University (SA), King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre (SA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.