ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1359 CLINICAL PROFILES AND PLATELET RESPONSE DIFFERENCES IN NEUROINTERVENTIONAL PATIENTS: CAROTID STENOSIS VERSUS INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM PATHOLOGY

Abstract Background and aims Periprocedural management in neurointervention requires precise antiplatelet control due to the variability in individual responses. Hyporesponsiveness is associated with an increased risk of periprocedural thromboembolic events, whereas hyperresponsive patients exhibit a higher risk of hemorrhagic complications. This study compares baseline characteristics and platelet response profiles (ARU/PRU) between patients treated for carotid pathology and intracranial aneurysms. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 419 patients treated at Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío (Seville, Spain), including 214 with carotid pathology and 205 with intracranial aneurysms. Demographic variables, vascular risk factors, and comorbidities were collected. Platelet function was assessed using VerifyNow, and patients were classified as hyper-responders (PRU < 80), normo-responders (PRU 80–230), or non-responders (PRU > 230). Intergroup comparisons were performed. Results Patients in the carotid group were older (median age 69 vs. 57 years) and predominantly male (79% vs. 34%) compared with aneurysm patients (p < 0.001). Cardiovascular risk factors were significantly more prevalent in the carotid group, including diabetes mellitus (44% vs. 9.3%), hypertension (81% vs. 53%), and heart disease (23% vs. 6.8%) (all p < 0.001). Hyper-responsiveness was predominant among aneurysm patients (58%), whereas non-response was significantly more common in the carotid group (46%) (p < 0.001). Median PRU values were higher in carotid patients (223.5 vs. 63; p < 0.001). Conclusions Carotid patients exhibit a higher cardiovascular risk profile and greater biological resistance to antiplatelet therapy. Aneurysms patients exhibit a higher prevalence of hyper-responsiveness. These findings suggest the need for personalized antiplatelet protocols tailored to the neurovascular pathology being treated. Conflict of interest Nothing to disclose.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Stroke Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.651
Primary Topic
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1359 CLINICAL PROFILES AND PLATELET RESPONSE DIFFERENCES IN NEUROINTERVENTIONAL PATIENTS: CAROTID STENOSIS VERSUS INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM PATHOLOGY

H. H Andrade, A. VIDAL GONZÁLEZ, Asier de Albóniga-Chindurza, Elena Zapata Arriaza et al.
European Stroke Journal
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1359 CLINICAL PROFILES AND PLATELET RESPONSE DIFFERENCES IN NEUROINTERVENTIONAL PATIENTS: CAROTID STENOSIS VERSUS INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM PATHOLOGY

H. H Andrade, A. VIDAL GONZÁLEZ, Asier de Albóniga-Chindurza, Elena Zapata Arriaza, Antonio Pulido Bonillo, Marta Aguilar, Christian Norambuena Aguayo
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims Periprocedural management in neurointervention requires precise antiplatelet control due to the variability in individual responses. Hyporesponsiveness is associated with an increased risk of periprocedural thromboembolic events, whereas hyperresponsive patients exhibit a higher risk of hemorrhagic complications. This study compares baseline characteristics and platelet response profiles (ARU/PRU) between patients treated for carotid pathology and intracranial aneurysms. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 419 patients treated at Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío (Seville, Spain), including 214 with carotid pathology and 205 with intracranial aneurysms. Demographic variables, vascular risk factors, and comorbidities were collected. Platelet function was assessed using VerifyNow, and patients were classified as hyper-responders (PRU < 80), normo-responders (PRU 80–230), or non-responders (PRU > 230). Intergroup comparisons were performed. Results Patients in the carotid group were older (median age 69 vs. 57 years) and predominantly male (79% vs. 34%) compared with aneurysm patients (p < 0.001). Cardiovascular risk factors were significantly more prevalent in the carotid group, including diabetes mellitus (44% vs. 9.3%), hypertension (81% vs. 53%), and heart disease (23% vs. 6.8%) (all p < 0.001). Hyper-responsiveness was predominant among aneurysm patients (58%), whereas non-response was significantly more common in the carotid group (46%) (p < 0.001). Median PRU values were higher in carotid patients (223.5 vs. 63; p < 0.001). Conclusions Carotid patients exhibit a higher cardiovascular risk profile and greater biological resistance to antiplatelet therapy. Aneurysms patients exhibit a higher prevalence of hyper-responsiveness. These findings suggest the need for personalized antiplatelet protocols tailored to the neurovascular pathology being treated. Conflict of interest Nothing to disclose.

European Stroke JournalVol. 11(Supplement_1)
Fundación Pública Andaluza para la Gestión de la Investigación en Salud de Sevilla (ES), Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.