ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1252 INTRAVENOUS THROMBOLYSIS IN ACUTE ISCHEMIC STROKE PATIENTS ON DIRECT ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS UNDERGOING ENDOVASCULAR THROMBECTOMY

Abstract Background and aims The necessity of bridging endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) has been questioned. Recent observational studies suggest that IVT is safe in AIS patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC). We aimed to investigate the risk-benefit of bridging therapy in AIS patients on DOAC. Methods We used the SITS international Treatment registry to include AIS patients on DOAC that received EVT. We compared bridging therapy with EVT alone using propensity score matching (PSM). Primary outcome was 3-month functional independency (modified Rankin scale 0-2). Secondary outcomes were symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH) per SITS-MOST definition and death by 3 months. We performed explorative multivariate regression of quadratically modelled imaging-to-groin time, investigating any cut-offs for functional independence. Results Of 1,991 DOAC treated EVT patients, 317 received IVT. After PSM, we included 294 bridging therapy patients and 587 EVT only patients. After PSM, the groups were well balanced for baseline and demographic characteristics (median NIHSS 17 vs. 16, age 76 and onset to imaging time 99 min in both groups). There were no statistically significant differences in functional independence (36% vs. 35%), SICH (1.5% vs. 2.2%) and mortality (34% vs. 30%) between bridging and EVT only. Explorative analyses found imaging-to-groin time within 66 min favors EVT only while imaging-to-groin time beyond 185 min favors bridging. Conclusions We found no differences in safety and outcomes between bridging therapy and EVT only in AIS patients on DOAC. Explorative analyses suggesting shorter imaging-to-groin times favor direct EVT while longer times favor bridging. Conflict of interest Marius Matusevicius: Nothing to disclose. Ana Paiva Nunes: Nothing to disclose. Andrea Zini: Nothing to disclose. Guido Bigliardi: Nothing to disclose. André Peeters: Nothing to disclose. Danilo Toni: Nothing to disclose. Niaz Ahmed: Nothing to disclose.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Stroke Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.613
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1252 INTRAVENOUS THROMBOLYSIS IN ACUTE ISCHEMIC STROKE PATIENTS ON DIRECT ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS UNDERGOING ENDOVASCULAR THROMBECTOMY

Ana Paiva Nunes, Niaz Ahmed, Marius Matusevicius, Danilo Toni et al.
European Stroke Journal
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1252 INTRAVENOUS THROMBOLYSIS IN ACUTE ISCHEMIC STROKE PATIENTS ON DIRECT ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS UNDERGOING ENDOVASCULAR THROMBECTOMY

Ana Paiva Nunes, Niaz Ahmed, Marius Matusevicius, Danilo Toni, André Peeters, Andrea Zini, Guido Bigliardi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims The necessity of bridging endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) has been questioned. Recent observational studies suggest that IVT is safe in AIS patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC). We aimed to investigate the risk-benefit of bridging therapy in AIS patients on DOAC. Methods We used the SITS international Treatment registry to include AIS patients on DOAC that received EVT. We compared bridging therapy with EVT alone using propensity score matching (PSM). Primary outcome was 3-month functional independency (modified Rankin scale 0-2). Secondary outcomes were symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH) per SITS-MOST definition and death by 3 months. We performed explorative multivariate regression of quadratically modelled imaging-to-groin time, investigating any cut-offs for functional independence. Results Of 1,991 DOAC treated EVT patients, 317 received IVT. After PSM, we included 294 bridging therapy patients and 587 EVT only patients. After PSM, the groups were well balanced for baseline and demographic characteristics (median NIHSS 17 vs. 16, age 76 and onset to imaging time 99 min in both groups). There were no statistically significant differences in functional independence (36% vs. 35%), SICH (1.5% vs. 2.2%) and mortality (34% vs. 30%) between bridging and EVT only. Explorative analyses found imaging-to-groin time within 66 min favors EVT only while imaging-to-groin time beyond 185 min favors bridging. Conclusions We found no differences in safety and outcomes between bridging therapy and EVT only in AIS patients on DOAC. Explorative analyses suggesting shorter imaging-to-groin times favor direct EVT while longer times favor bridging. Conflict of interest Marius Matusevicius: Nothing to disclose. Ana Paiva Nunes: Nothing to disclose. Andrea Zini: Nothing to disclose. Guido Bigliardi: Nothing to disclose. André Peeters: Nothing to disclose. Danilo Toni: Nothing to disclose. Niaz Ahmed: Nothing to disclose.

European Stroke JournalVol. 11(Supplement_1)
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc (BE), Karolinska University Hospital (SE), Stroke Association (GB), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Azienda Unita' Sanitaria Locale Di Modena (IT), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena (IT), Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna (IT), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.