ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A800 MULTICENTRE EVALUATION OF IN-HOSPITAL STROKE CARE PROCESSES USING RANDOM INTERCEPT AND RANDOM SLOPE-BASED INTERRUPTED TIME SERIES MODELS: THE IMPETUS STUDY

Abstract Background and aims High-quality in-hospital stroke-care facilitates improved patient-outcomes, yet variation exists in the implementation evidence-based practices. We evaluated temporal changes in in-hospital stroke-care process-indicators following a multicentre intervention of uniform stroke-care pathway, accounting for centre-level heterogeneity in baseline performance and trends. Methods Effect of implementing an evaluation-treatment-package at 23 hospitals (10,193 stroke-patients) was assessed through a prospective-quasi-experimental-design using mixed-effects interrupted-time-series-analysis on weekly-pooled hospital-level data. Outcomes were modelled as proportions using binomial mixed-effects segmented regression with fixed-effects for time, intervention, and post-intervention-slope. Center was included as a random-intercept, and random-slope for time, to account for heterogeneity in baseline-performance, and secular-trends across centres. Results Across 131 weeks, baseline adherence was high for assessing GCS, blood-pressure, positioning, swallow, rehabilitation-advice, sugar, but low for DVT, NIHSS, CTA, MRA, HbA1c, noting-of-complications, with significant between-centre variability. GCS had significant pre-intervention trend. Significant immediate post-intervention increase found for NIHSS (OR 1.40, 95%CI: 1.02,1.91), Holter (1.99, 95%CI: 1.22,3.24), HbA1C (1.66, 95%CI: 1.21,2.26) without a sustained change in slope. Significant change in post-intervention-trend seen for Rehabilitation-advice (8.82, 95%CI: 4.20,18.50) blood-pressure-assessment (140.0, 95%CI: 28.58,686.06), swallow-assessment (3.08, 95%CI: 1.10,8.64), DVT-assessment (4.66, 95%CI: 1.77,12.31) indicating accelerated improvement over time. Positioning-care, noting-complications, showed no significant intervention-effects. Large standard-deviation of random-slope implied centres improved or deteriorated at markedly different rates. Conclusions It is possible for uniform stroke-care intervention to achieve sustained post-intervention improvements in many in-hospital stroke-care processes, conditional on centre-level heterogeneity. However, some indicators failed to sustain post-intervention improvement despite achieving an immediate improvement which requires centre-level assessment of reasons. Conflict of interest Partha Haldar: nothing to disclose; Rohit Bhatia: nothing to disclose; Shweta Gupta: nothing to disclose; Vasantha Padma: nothing to disclose; Mamta Singh: nothing to disclose; Inder Puri: nothing to disclose; Vijay Sardana: nothing to disclose; Alok Verma: nothing to disclose; Samhita Panda: nothing to disclose; Biman Kanti Ray: nothing to disclose Table 1 - belongs to Results Figure 1 - belongs to Results Figure 2 - belongs to Conclusions

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Stroke Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.1413
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A800 MULTICENTRE EVALUATION OF IN-HOSPITAL STROKE CARE PROCESSES USING RANDOM INTERCEPT AND RANDOM SLOPE-BASED INTERRUPTED TIME SERIES MODELS: THE IMPETUS STUDY

M Singh, Inder Puri, Samhita Panda, Vijay Sardana et al.
European Stroke Journal
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A800 MULTICENTRE EVALUATION OF IN-HOSPITAL STROKE CARE PROCESSES USING RANDOM INTERCEPT AND RANDOM SLOPE-BASED INTERRUPTED TIME SERIES MODELS: THE IMPETUS STUDY

M Singh, Inder Puri, Samhita Panda, Vijay Sardana, Rohit Bhatia, Alok Verma, Shweta Gupta, Vasantha Padma, Biman Kanti Ray, Partha Haldar
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims High-quality in-hospital stroke-care facilitates improved patient-outcomes, yet variation exists in the implementation evidence-based practices. We evaluated temporal changes in in-hospital stroke-care process-indicators following a multicentre intervention of uniform stroke-care pathway, accounting for centre-level heterogeneity in baseline performance and trends. Methods Effect of implementing an evaluation-treatment-package at 23 hospitals (10,193 stroke-patients) was assessed through a prospective-quasi-experimental-design using mixed-effects interrupted-time-series-analysis on weekly-pooled hospital-level data. Outcomes were modelled as proportions using binomial mixed-effects segmented regression with fixed-effects for time, intervention, and post-intervention-slope. Center was included as a random-intercept, and random-slope for time, to account for heterogeneity in baseline-performance, and secular-trends across centres. Results Across 131 weeks, baseline adherence was high for assessing GCS, blood-pressure, positioning, swallow, rehabilitation-advice, sugar, but low for DVT, NIHSS, CTA, MRA, HbA1c, noting-of-complications, with significant between-centre variability. GCS had significant pre-intervention trend. Significant immediate post-intervention increase found for NIHSS (OR 1.40, 95%CI: 1.02,1.91), Holter (1.99, 95%CI: 1.22,3.24), HbA1C (1.66, 95%CI: 1.21,2.26) without a sustained change in slope. Significant change in post-intervention-trend seen for Rehabilitation-advice (8.82, 95%CI: 4.20,18.50) blood-pressure-assessment (140.0, 95%CI: 28.58,686.06), swallow-assessment (3.08, 95%CI: 1.10,8.64), DVT-assessment (4.66, 95%CI: 1.77,12.31) indicating accelerated improvement over time. Positioning-care, noting-complications, showed no significant intervention-effects. Large standard-deviation of random-slope implied centres improved or deteriorated at markedly different rates. Conclusions It is possible for uniform stroke-care intervention to achieve sustained post-intervention improvements in many in-hospital stroke-care processes, conditional on centre-level heterogeneity. However, some indicators failed to sustain post-intervention improvement despite achieving an immediate improvement which requires centre-level assessment of reasons. Conflict of interest Partha Haldar: nothing to disclose; Rohit Bhatia: nothing to disclose; Shweta Gupta: nothing to disclose; Vasantha Padma: nothing to disclose; Mamta Singh: nothing to disclose; Inder Puri: nothing to disclose; Vijay Sardana: nothing to disclose; Alok Verma: nothing to disclose; Samhita Panda: nothing to disclose; Biman Kanti Ray: nothing to disclose Table 1 - belongs to Results Figure 1 - belongs to Results Figure 2 - belongs to Conclusions

European Stroke JournalVol. 11(Supplement_1)
University of Kota (IN), All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur (IN), Sardar Patel Medical College (IN), Bangur Institute of Neurosciences (IN), Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi Memorial Medical College (IN), All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.