Assessing Ecological Vulnerability in the Northern Guangdong Mountains Using Deep Learning

Ecological vulnerability assessment serves as a prerequisite for ecological governance, yet evaluating large-scale ecological vulnerability remains challenging. To address this challenge, this study integrates geological elements into ecological vulnerability assessment, taking Ruyuan Area in the Northern Guangdong Mountains, China, as a case study. The area faces ecological hazards such as land desertification and soil erosion, indicating severe governance challenges. This study selected 14 ecological vulnerability factors and constructed assessment models based on Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). A total of 800 ecological vulnerability sampling points were obtained by combining field survey data with remote sensing imagery. The models were trained using binary vulnerability labels. The resulting continuous probability outputs were then classified into five vulnerability levels using the natural breaks method to generate the final ecological vulnerability map. It should be noted that the multi-level vulnerability map represents graded probability-based differentiation rather than supervised multi-class prediction. Model performance was validated using three metrics: Area Under Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC–ROC), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). The CNN (AUC = 0.916) model outperformed the DNN model (AUC = 0.895). According to the CNN-based classification results, non-vulnerable, slightly vulnerable, mildly vulnerable, moderately vulnerable, and highly vulnerable areas accounted for 36.19%, 22.85%, 14.24%, 12.31%, and 14.41% of the total area, respectively. High ecological vulnerability zones were concentrated in Daqiao, Luoyang, Dabu, and parts of Rucheng towns, with soil parent material and vegetation coverage identified as the main contributing factors, among which parent material was the most important. This finding underscores the notable impact of geological factors on local ecological vulnerability. Based on these results, nine ecological–geological subareas were delineated, and targeted ecological protection and restoration recommendations were proposed. This study, employing machine learning techniques, constructed an ecological vulnerability assessment model incorporating geological elements, thereby providing scientific support for targeted ecological governance in the study area.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18094472
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Ecological Vulnerability in the Northern Guangdong Mountains Using Deep Learning

H F Liu, Jinghua Zhang, Wenlong Gao, Yu Guo et al.
Sustainability
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
article

Assessing Ecological Vulnerability in the Northern Guangdong Mountains Using Deep Learning

H F Liu, Jinghua Zhang, Wenlong Gao, Yu Guo, Wenwen Tong, Zongwang Yi, Hao Chen, Zining Liu
article en

Abstract

Ecological vulnerability assessment serves as a prerequisite for ecological governance, yet evaluating large-scale ecological vulnerability remains challenging. To address this challenge, this study integrates geological elements into ecological vulnerability assessment, taking Ruyuan Area in the Northern Guangdong Mountains, China, as a case study. The area faces ecological hazards such as land desertification and soil erosion, indicating severe governance challenges. This study selected 14 ecological vulnerability factors and constructed assessment models based on Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). A total of 800 ecological vulnerability sampling points were obtained by combining field survey data with remote sensing imagery. The models were trained using binary vulnerability labels. The resulting continuous probability outputs were then classified into five vulnerability levels using the natural breaks method to generate the final ecological vulnerability map. It should be noted that the multi-level vulnerability map represents graded probability-based differentiation rather than supervised multi-class prediction. Model performance was validated using three metrics: Area Under Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC–ROC), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). The CNN (AUC = 0.916) model outperformed the DNN model (AUC = 0.895). According to the CNN-based classification results, non-vulnerable, slightly vulnerable, mildly vulnerable, moderately vulnerable, and highly vulnerable areas accounted for 36.19%, 22.85%, 14.24%, 12.31%, and 14.41% of the total area, respectively. High ecological vulnerability zones were concentrated in Daqiao, Luoyang, Dabu, and parts of Rucheng towns, with soil parent material and vegetation coverage identified as the main contributing factors, among which parent material was the most important. This finding underscores the notable impact of geological factors on local ecological vulnerability. Based on these results, nine ecological–geological subareas were delineated, and targeted ecological protection and restoration recommendations were proposed. This study, employing machine learning techniques, constructed an ecological vulnerability assessment model incorporating geological elements, thereby providing scientific support for targeted ecological governance in the study area.

SustainabilityVol. 18(9)
China Geological Survey (CN), Guangzhou Marine Geological Survey (CN), Chongqing Bureau of Geology and Minerals Exploration (CN)
China Geological Survey
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.