Effectiveness of Low-Dose Atropine (0.01% to 0.05%) in Reducing Myopia Progression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose: Low-dose atropine has been increasingly investigated as a pharmacological intervention to slow myopia progression in children. However, variability in atropine concentrations and reported outcomes across randomised clinical trials has led to uncertainty regrading its overall efficacy and safety. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of low-dose atropine eye drops (0.01– 0.05%) in slowing myopia progression in children. Patients and Methods: This review followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42025635523). A comprehensive search of PubMed, ScienceDirect, MedLine, and the Cochrane Library was conducted in January 2025. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials from 2019 to 2024 involving children aged 4– 18 years with progressive myopia. Low-dose atropine concentrations evaluated across studies included 0.01%, 0.02%, 0.025%, and 0.05%, compared with placebo or control interventions. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool were performed independently by multiple reviewers. Meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager (RevMan) 5.4 on Mean changes in axial length and spherical equivalent. Fixed or random effects models were applied based on heterogeneity (I 2 ). Results: Thirteen randomized controlled trials involving 2529 children were included. Low-dose atropine (0.01– 0.05%) significantly reduced axial elongation compared with placebo (mean difference [MD]: − 0.11 mm; 95% CI: − 0.13 to − 0.09; p < 0.00001) with substantial heterogeneity (I 2 = 92%). Similarly, atropine was effective in slowing spherical equivalent progression (MD: +0.24 D; 95% CI: +0.14 to +0.33; p < 0.00001; I 2 = 79%). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings. Risk of bias was generally low across included trials, particularly for randomisation and incomplete outcome data, although some studies showed concerns related to participants blinding and outcome assessment. No substantial evidence of publication bias was observed. Conclusion: Low-dose atropine (0.01– 0.05%) may be an effective and generally safe intervention for slowing myopia progression in children. While the findings support its potential role in myopia control, further long-term trials are needed to clarify optimal dosing strategies and sustained post-treatment effects. Keywords: myopia, low-dose atropine, axial length, spherical equivalent, children

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical ophthalmology
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2147/opth.s564944
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness of Low-Dose Atropine (0.01% to 0.05%) in Reducing Myopia Progression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

mohammad albadri, Salma Almarwani, Abdullah Alqahtani, Lama Alghamdi et al.
Clinical ophthalmology
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

Effectiveness of Low-Dose Atropine (0.01% to 0.05%) in Reducing Myopia Progression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

mohammad albadri, Salma Almarwani, Abdullah Alqahtani, Lama Alghamdi, Ahmed Morad, Bushra Bin Saddiq, Basmah Alweal
article en

Abstract

Purpose: Low-dose atropine has been increasingly investigated as a pharmacological intervention to slow myopia progression in children. However, variability in atropine concentrations and reported outcomes across randomised clinical trials has led to uncertainty regrading its overall efficacy and safety. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of low-dose atropine eye drops (0.01– 0.05%) in slowing myopia progression in children. Patients and Methods: This review followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42025635523). A comprehensive search of PubMed, ScienceDirect, MedLine, and the Cochrane Library was conducted in January 2025. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials from 2019 to 2024 involving children aged 4– 18 years with progressive myopia. Low-dose atropine concentrations evaluated across studies included 0.01%, 0.02%, 0.025%, and 0.05%, compared with placebo or control interventions. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool were performed independently by multiple reviewers. Meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager (RevMan) 5.4 on Mean changes in axial length and spherical equivalent. Fixed or random effects models were applied based on heterogeneity (I 2 ). Results: Thirteen randomized controlled trials involving 2529 children were included. Low-dose atropine (0.01– 0.05%) significantly reduced axial elongation compared with placebo (mean difference [MD]: − 0.11 mm; 95% CI: − 0.13 to − 0.09; p < 0.00001) with substantial heterogeneity (I 2 = 92%). Similarly, atropine was effective in slowing spherical equivalent progression (MD: +0.24 D; 95% CI: +0.14 to +0.33; p < 0.00001; I 2 = 79%). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings. Risk of bias was generally low across included trials, particularly for randomisation and incomplete outcome data, although some studies showed concerns related to participants blinding and outcome assessment. No substantial evidence of publication bias was observed. Conclusion: Low-dose atropine (0.01– 0.05%) may be an effective and generally safe intervention for slowing myopia progression in children. While the findings support its potential role in myopia control, further long-term trials are needed to clarify optimal dosing strategies and sustained post-treatment effects. Keywords: myopia, low-dose atropine, axial length, spherical equivalent, children

Clinical ophthalmologyVol. Volume 20
King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (SA), King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (SA), Batterjee Medical College
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.