ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1417 MEDIUM-VESSEL OCCLUSION RECANALISATION AFTER MEDICAL MANAGEMENT, AND CLINICAL OUTCOME

Abstract Background and aims In acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with medium-vessel occlusion (MeVO), intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is the currently recommended acute recanalisation therapy. We aimed to evaluate the association between imaging-proven recanalisation (IPR) and clinical outcome in MeVO-AIS treated with conservative treatment (CTr) or IVT. Methods From our local stroke registry we included all consecutive patients with MeVO-AIS receiving CTr or IVT. IPR was defined as complete recanalisation on 12-24-hour CTA/MRA. Clinical outcomes were 24h-NIHSS and 3-month modified-Rankin-Scale (mRS). The association of treatment (CTr vs. IVT) and recanalisation (IPR vs. no IPR) with clinical outcomes was assessed using propensity-score-weighed regression models. Weighting accounted for pre-stroke mRS, baseline NIHSS, age, sex, onset-to-door time, MeVO localisation, vascular risk factors. Results Among 229 patients with MeVO, 52 received CTr and 177 IVT. Overall, 114 had IPR. Patients with IPR had more M3 occlusions, fewer P1-P3 occlusions, and shorter onset-to-door times. IVT was significantly associated with IPR (aOR=16.8, 95%CI=5.37-48.74) but not with 3-month mRS. In the overall cohort, IPR was associated with greater 24-hour NIHSS improvement (beta-coeff=1.93, 95%CI=0.39-3.47), better 3-month mRS (pswOR=2.50, 95%CI=1.56-4.00), and higher rates of excellent outcome (mRS 0-1, pswOR=3.10, 95%CI=1.72-5.59). The same associations between IPR and clinical outcomes were observed in the cohort of IVT-treated patients. Conclusions In MeVO-AIS treated with medical management, IPR is associated with improved functional outcome. While IVT increased the likelihood of IPR, persistent occlusion remained frequent, suggesting that more effective revascularisation strategies are needed to improve recanalisation rates and thus clinical outcomes. Conflict of interest François Fenter: nothing to disclose. Vincent Dunet: nothing to disclose. Patrik Michel: nothing to disclose. Davide Strambo: advisory board for Boehringer Ingelheim. Figure 1 - belongs to Results

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Stroke Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.682
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1417 MEDIUM-VESSEL OCCLUSION RECANALISATION AFTER MEDICAL MANAGEMENT, AND CLINICAL OUTCOME

Vincent Dunet, Davide Strambo, Patrik Michel, François Fenter
European Stroke Journal
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1417 MEDIUM-VESSEL OCCLUSION RECANALISATION AFTER MEDICAL MANAGEMENT, AND CLINICAL OUTCOME

Vincent Dunet, Davide Strambo, Patrik Michel, François Fenter
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims In acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with medium-vessel occlusion (MeVO), intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is the currently recommended acute recanalisation therapy. We aimed to evaluate the association between imaging-proven recanalisation (IPR) and clinical outcome in MeVO-AIS treated with conservative treatment (CTr) or IVT. Methods From our local stroke registry we included all consecutive patients with MeVO-AIS receiving CTr or IVT. IPR was defined as complete recanalisation on 12-24-hour CTA/MRA. Clinical outcomes were 24h-NIHSS and 3-month modified-Rankin-Scale (mRS). The association of treatment (CTr vs. IVT) and recanalisation (IPR vs. no IPR) with clinical outcomes was assessed using propensity-score-weighed regression models. Weighting accounted for pre-stroke mRS, baseline NIHSS, age, sex, onset-to-door time, MeVO localisation, vascular risk factors. Results Among 229 patients with MeVO, 52 received CTr and 177 IVT. Overall, 114 had IPR. Patients with IPR had more M3 occlusions, fewer P1-P3 occlusions, and shorter onset-to-door times. IVT was significantly associated with IPR (aOR=16.8, 95%CI=5.37-48.74) but not with 3-month mRS. In the overall cohort, IPR was associated with greater 24-hour NIHSS improvement (beta-coeff=1.93, 95%CI=0.39-3.47), better 3-month mRS (pswOR=2.50, 95%CI=1.56-4.00), and higher rates of excellent outcome (mRS 0-1, pswOR=3.10, 95%CI=1.72-5.59). The same associations between IPR and clinical outcomes were observed in the cohort of IVT-treated patients. Conclusions In MeVO-AIS treated with medical management, IPR is associated with improved functional outcome. While IVT increased the likelihood of IPR, persistent occlusion remained frequent, suggesting that more effective revascularisation strategies are needed to improve recanalisation rates and thus clinical outcomes. Conflict of interest François Fenter: nothing to disclose. Vincent Dunet: nothing to disclose. Patrik Michel: nothing to disclose. Davide Strambo: advisory board for Boehringer Ingelheim. Figure 1 - belongs to Results

European Stroke JournalVol. 11(Supplement_1)
Center for Neurosciences (US), University of Lausanne (CH)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.