ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026LB198 BLOOD PRESSURE AND RESPONSE TO ANDEXANET IN FXA INHIBITOR-ASSOCIATED INTRACRANIAL HEMORRHAGE – SECONDARY ANALYSES OF ANNEXA-I

Abstract Background and aims Elevated blood pressure (BP) is a significant predictor of hematoma expansion (HE) and may interact with hemostatic therapies intended to limit hematoma growth. We investigated the association between baseline and post-randomization BP and outcomes in patients with acute FXa inhibitor–associated intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), and whether BP modified the treatment effect of andexanet in the ANNEXa-I trial. Methods We conducted secondary analyses of ANNEXa-I participants stratified by quartiles of systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) at baseline and at 3-, 6-, and 12-hours post-randomization. We assessed treatment interactions across these BP strata for effective hemostasis, HE, and acute neurological deterioration at 12 hours; avoidance of rescue therapy between 3 and 12 hours; mortality at 12 hours and 30 days; and good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0–3) at 30 days. Results Among 530 participants with FXa inhibitor–associated ICH enrolled in the trial, the mean (standard deviation) baseline SBP and DBP were 158.5 (26.4) and 84.6 (18.1) mm Hg, respectively. Patients with HE had higher mean baseline DBP compared to patients without HE (88.1[19.0] vs. 83.1[17.4] mm Hg, p=0.004). No treatment interactions were observed between baseline SBP or DBP and the primary endpoint of effective hemostasis, nor with any pre-specified secondary endpoints. Analyses of subgroup interactions according to post-randomization BP are ongoing and will be presented. Conclusions These secondary analyses of the ANNEXa-I trial, examining baseline and post-randomization BP, will inform individualized clinical decision-making for patients with acute FXa inhibitor–associated intracerebral hemorrhage. Conflict of interest

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Stroke Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.1903
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026LB198 BLOOD PRESSURE AND RESPONSE TO ANDEXANET IN FXA INHIBITOR-ASSOCIATED INTRACRANIAL HEMORRHAGE – SECONDARY ANALYSES OF ANNEXA-I

Kevin Reeh, Lina Palaiodimou, Per Ladenvall, Mukul Sharma et al.
European Stroke Journal
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026LB198 BLOOD PRESSURE AND RESPONSE TO ANDEXANET IN FXA INHIBITOR-ASSOCIATED INTRACRANIAL HEMORRHAGE – SECONDARY ANALYSES OF ANNEXA-I

Kevin Reeh, Lina Palaiodimou, Per Ladenvall, Mukul Sharma, Lizhen Xu, Georgios Tsivgoulis, Ashkan Shoamanesh, Aristeidis Katsanos
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims Elevated blood pressure (BP) is a significant predictor of hematoma expansion (HE) and may interact with hemostatic therapies intended to limit hematoma growth. We investigated the association between baseline and post-randomization BP and outcomes in patients with acute FXa inhibitor–associated intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), and whether BP modified the treatment effect of andexanet in the ANNEXa-I trial. Methods We conducted secondary analyses of ANNEXa-I participants stratified by quartiles of systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) at baseline and at 3-, 6-, and 12-hours post-randomization. We assessed treatment interactions across these BP strata for effective hemostasis, HE, and acute neurological deterioration at 12 hours; avoidance of rescue therapy between 3 and 12 hours; mortality at 12 hours and 30 days; and good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0–3) at 30 days. Results Among 530 participants with FXa inhibitor–associated ICH enrolled in the trial, the mean (standard deviation) baseline SBP and DBP were 158.5 (26.4) and 84.6 (18.1) mm Hg, respectively. Patients with HE had higher mean baseline DBP compared to patients without HE (88.1[19.0] vs. 83.1[17.4] mm Hg, p=0.004). No treatment interactions were observed between baseline SBP or DBP and the primary endpoint of effective hemostasis, nor with any pre-specified secondary endpoints. Analyses of subgroup interactions according to post-randomization BP are ongoing and will be presented. Conclusions These secondary analyses of the ANNEXa-I trial, examining baseline and post-randomization BP, will inform individualized clinical decision-making for patients with acute FXa inhibitor–associated intracerebral hemorrhage. Conflict of interest

European Stroke JournalVol. 11(Supplement_1)
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR), Population Health Research Institute (CA), AstraZeneca (Italy) (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.