Would I work in this team again? The role of team gender composition in willingness to work in a team

This study investigates the relationship between the gender composition of a group and participants’ willingness to remain in the same team for a second project. In a university field setting, we conduct a preregistered experiment where we exogenously allocate students to a female-majority, gender-balanced or male-dominant team to complete a curriculum-based assignment. Our primary outcome of interest is an incentivised measure of willingness to remain in the same team for a future project (teams for another assignment are chosen according to students’ preferences). Participants prefer male-dominated and gender-balanced teams over female-majority group types. However, the preference against female-dominant teams is irrational, as female-dominant teams outperform other group types.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Behavioral Economics
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/rbe-03-2025-0225
Primary Topic
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Would I work in this team again? The role of team gender composition in willingness to work in a team

Michelle Pleace, Nicky Nicholls
Review of Behavioral Economics
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
article

Would I work in this team again? The role of team gender composition in willingness to work in a team

Michelle Pleace, Nicky Nicholls
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between the gender composition of a group and participants’ willingness to remain in the same team for a second project. In a university field setting, we conduct a preregistered experiment where we exogenously allocate students to a female-majority, gender-balanced or male-dominant team to complete a curriculum-based assignment. Our primary outcome of interest is an incentivised measure of willingness to remain in the same team for a future project (teams for another assignment are chosen according to students’ preferences). Participants prefer male-dominated and gender-balanced teams over female-majority group types. However, the preference against female-dominant teams is irrational, as female-dominant teams outperform other group types.

Review of Behavioral EconomicsVol. 13(1)
University of Pretoria (ZA)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.