Source-Separated Wastewater – Enabling Higher Energy Recovery

• A function was identified to select greywater or mixed wastewater for heat recovery • 1 m 3 of Dutch treated greywater could yield 9.7 kWh of heat and cut 1.8 kg of CO₂ • Heat recovery from source-separated WWTP could save up to 10% of household energy • 11 out of 12 months, greywater is a better heat source than mixed wastewater This study quantifies the impact of source-separation in heat recovery by comparing greywater in source-separated wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) versus mixed wastewater in conventional WWTPs as a heat source using an idealized Lorenz heat pump model. The results reveal that greywater requires less electricity input than mixed wastewater below a certain heat recovery percentage, defined relative to the thermal energy required for domestic hot water heating. This percentage has a functional relationship with the temperature gap between greywater and tap water. This relationship serves as a delineation function, identifying when greywater or mixed wastewater is advantageous for heat recovery under typical wastewater conditions across heat recovery percentage. Beyond conceptual calculations, this study investigates heat recovery from treated greywater using measured temperature data from a 207-household pilot source-separated WWTP with a CO 2 heat pump model. Various heat recovery scenarios are examined, including different supplied hot water temperatures, whether reusing treated greywater after heat recovery, and different heat loads. The standard scenario without water reuse can recover 9.7 kWh of thermal energy from 1 m³ of treated greywater and save 10% of household energy demand. With this heat recovery level, 11 out of 12 months, greywater is a better heat source compared to mixed wastewater, according to the delineation function. This work gives guidance for future wastewater heat recovery projects on selecting proper heat source between greywater and mixed wastewater. Furthermore, it addresses knowledge gap in heat recovery from treated greywater in source-separated WWTPs and provides a reference for future net-zero neighbourhoods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Nexus
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexus.2026.100722
Primary Topic
Membrane Separation Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Source-Separated Wastewater – Enabling Higher Energy Recovery

S. Gerbens, Henny C. van der Mei, Maria Cristina Gagliano, Shuoguang Yang et al.
Energy Nexus
Membrane Separation Technologies
article

Source-Separated Wastewater – Enabling Higher Energy Recovery

S. Gerbens, Henny C. van der Mei, Maria Cristina Gagliano, Shuoguang Yang, Bert Hamelers, David da Silva, Robert de Kler, Lucía Hernández-Leal
article en

Abstract

• A function was identified to select greywater or mixed wastewater for heat recovery • 1 m 3 of Dutch treated greywater could yield 9.7 kWh of heat and cut 1.8 kg of CO₂ • Heat recovery from source-separated WWTP could save up to 10% of household energy • 11 out of 12 months, greywater is a better heat source than mixed wastewater This study quantifies the impact of source-separation in heat recovery by comparing greywater in source-separated wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) versus mixed wastewater in conventional WWTPs as a heat source using an idealized Lorenz heat pump model. The results reveal that greywater requires less electricity input than mixed wastewater below a certain heat recovery percentage, defined relative to the thermal energy required for domestic hot water heating. This percentage has a functional relationship with the temperature gap between greywater and tap water. This relationship serves as a delineation function, identifying when greywater or mixed wastewater is advantageous for heat recovery under typical wastewater conditions across heat recovery percentage. Beyond conceptual calculations, this study investigates heat recovery from treated greywater using measured temperature data from a 207-household pilot source-separated WWTP with a CO 2 heat pump model. Various heat recovery scenarios are examined, including different supplied hot water temperatures, whether reusing treated greywater after heat recovery, and different heat loads. The standard scenario without water reuse can recover 9.7 kWh of thermal energy from 1 m³ of treated greywater and save 10% of household energy demand. With this heat recovery level, 11 out of 12 months, greywater is a better heat source compared to mixed wastewater, according to the delineation function. This work gives guidance for future wastewater heat recovery projects on selecting proper heat source between greywater and mixed wastewater. Furthermore, it addresses knowledge gap in heat recovery from treated greywater in source-separated WWTPs and provides a reference for future net-zero neighbourhoods.

Energy Nexus
University Medical Center Groningen (NL), University of Groningen (NL), Fryske Akademy (NL), Université Gustave Eiffel (FR), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschap, Ministerie van Economische Zaken en Klimaat, Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management, HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Membrane Separation Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.